
This is the large tatting WIP that I kept referring to towards the end of last year.
I have no idea if this centerpiece has a name - the pattern was at one point available on Georgia Seitz's website, but I have no idea if it still is.
I started this sometime in the spring of 2009 and worked on it on and off through most of the summer and fall. Towards the end of the year I put it down and I don't think picking it much in 2010. Last summer (2011) I finally picked it up again determined to finish it by the end of the year. It wasn't much of a stretch but it would have been easier if I had worked on it continuously. As it was, I would work on it a lot for a weekend then put it down for several weeks. It doesn't matter - it's done now!
Working notes:
1. I really like the center (first two rounds)! Too bad it bowled in my case, but I think it's really pretty.
2. As I mentioned in a previous post, I think there is a mistake in how the pattern is written. I think my compromise worked quite well.
3. The first round of medallions (round 7) looks a bit strange to me. I think the original pattern called for a needle lace filling in each medallion, which would probably look better. The idea of tacking down the whole doily to make the needle lace fillings does not really appeal to me though...
4. The second row of medallions (row 9) was unexpected. It calls for making the medallion first and then adding the chain in the center. I actually made a practice medallion and chain to see how fiddly it would be to work. My initial though was that if it would be too difficult to work, I would substitute the chain in the center with rings. It wasn't too bad except for working in the ends (I tend to prefer to work in the ends into rings rather than chains). Although I never made a prototype with a rings filling, I can imagine how it would look. Using the chains definitely looks different.
5. I often say that metallic thread hides a lot of mistakes, but so does small thread, especially in a piece this size. There are a number of joins at the wrong place or omitted joins. Several medallions in row 9 in particular are only joined by one picot instead of two. Usually by the time I noticed, I did not want to go back and cut out the offending medallions (or more often medallions). I think what matters more is that the medallions have the correct spacing between them. What's one more of less joining picot:)
6. One of the biggest mistakes was made in row 10 (chain). Unfortunately I didn't catch it until I was well into row 11. At one point I skipped the two picots that connect to the ring in the subsequent row. When I found the mistake there were two options I thought of:
1. Continue row 11 as the pattern is written and compensate for the missing picots in row 10 by making a "floating" ring that didn't connect to the chain below.
2. Omit a ring in row 11 but make the chain longer so that the next row would not be impacted.

As you can see from the picture above, I went with option 1. I am not sure why, since in the past when I discovered a very similar mistake, I went with option 2. I think option 2 would have been less glaring, but even option 1 is not all that noticeable now that the whole thing is done.
7. Row 12 threw me for a loop! It looked really straight forward but then I realized that the rings and chains don't have the proper orientation.
I tried three ways of making the lower clover (shown left - right in image below):
1. First clover was not an issue!
2. While making the chain leading down from the first upper clover, I realized that the picot would be in the wrong orientation to be joined to the second lower clover. I stuck an earring where the picot should be to keep the space and continued. The second lower clover was made and joined to that chain.
3. I didn't like the earring method and the picot looked funny, so I decided to try and make the ring while making the chain. When I got to the third lower clover, the ring on the left was already made, so I only had to make two more rings to complete the clover. I didn't like how that broke the symmetry of the clover.
4. In order to make the clover more symmetrical, I made the fourth lower clover in 3 parts. The first ring (left) was made while making the chain coming down from the third upper clover. The center ring was made when I came to the lower clover and the third ring (right) was made while making the chain leading from the fourth lower clover to the fourth upper clover. Although this made the clover symmetrical, it no longer looked like a clover in my eyes.

To be fair, only a tatter would probably notice the subtle difference in how the clovers are made, and even then, only if the person was focusing on the last row. When I pointed out the three versions to my husband he was able to see the difference, but I definitely had to point them out to him. I ended up going with version of option 1, but instead of using an old earring, I used a paper clip. I also didn't flip the first knot after the picot so that the core thread didn't get pulled too tight. It worked OK with some practice, but it was kind of fiddly. I tried to scan the paperclip in action, but it didn't turn out too well...

Although the last row was kind of fiddly to make with the paperclip, it is my favorite row. It would make a beautiful edging:)
Made with DMC Cordonnet 100 it measures just over 14 inches in diameter. The centerpiece required almost a whole ball of thread!