Search Hacker News by keywords, user, score, etc.
Subscribe to new search results by RSS or JSON

Instead he has lot of shares in companies supplying OAI with whatever components, I thought?

Clickbait

... and then, of course, we switch moral fallacies. The supposed superiority of doing nothing. Hope you never need an ambulance, because of course, clearly, according to your reasoning the moral action would be to let you die.

And btw: your motivation, obviously that you want Iran hardliners to win inside Iran, is showing. Carefully placing the blame for the actions of the hardliners with the US. Needless to say, that is not a moral position at all.

There's many problems. First: every agent with agency is of course responsible for their own actions. Which means Iran's regime, islamists and islamic clergy are despicable monsters because of what they did.

That there is a reason they did what they did does not explain their actions in any moral sense. It makes it worse, of course. It means that they're indeed fully responsible for their actions, that they're not insane, made a choice, and their choice shows them to be truly despicable, immoral and disgusting human beings.

it would be better to make p a const char* though, so that the code is not casting away the constness of the string literal (which can invoke undefined behaviour, though in practice string literals are going to be in a read-only area of memory anyway).

Is it mostly people trying to give you their mixtapes?

Even with very good ventilation, gas ranges will pollute your air to a surprising degree.

> YC is, ultimately, not responsible for what these startups choose to do.

Formally they might not be (depends on the case), but morally they are.

Check out a lock like this: https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B07DR9CMGZ

Mount it near the top of the door, out of reach of the small escape artist.

I had exactly the same problem and this solved it.

I don't consider vibe coding to be coding :)

Unless, of course, you're reviewing and editing the code, in which case..... back to the problem of the phone.

This is the obvious choice.

The social Darwinists that ran with nature red in tooth and claw and took survival of the best fitted to mean the physically fittest and most aggressively dominant win are the ones responsible for your impressions.

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_Darwinism

They're very much a fork from the Alfred Russel Wallace / Charles Darwin theory of natural selection.

Upvoted because, yup, it's insanity.

However:

> Why on earth would you install something like that has access to your entire machine, even if it is a separate one which has the potential to scan local networks?

I'd say that it's a given that we live in a world when your LAN is infested with compromised and hostile devices: from phones (spying devices) to home automation (spying chinese webcams) to TVs (with the TV's microphone listening 24/7 to everything people are saying) to chinese routers (which, yup, have backdoors for the chinese state) to that corean soundbar to really whatever enshittied device the world of enshittified turds we live in can come up with.

It is a fact of life that compromised, insecure, backdoored and at times all three of these shall find their way to our homes and appartments...

And it shouldn't be an issue.

What I mean by this: machines could be scanning my local networks and even maybe determine that this box at this IP is running Linux and... It still should be able to do exactly jack fucking shit with that information.

We must all learn to secure our devices for the Internet of Insecure and Enshittified Things is moving forward at godspeed. And if you think OpenClaw on its own device on your LAN is bad, wait until all the companies that were already selling enshittifed devices since years realize they'll now be able to enshittify those even more by slapping OpenClaw (or the equivalent) on their devices.

These insecure turds are all going to get a big boost of insecuredness, this time AI powered.

I'd say: bring it on. I'm ready. We all should be.

I’m working on that as https://zorto.dev. quite early but the same idea, nice GUI and agent interfaces over files in Git

I’m not a security researcher, but I know a few and I think universally they’d disagree with this take.

The llms know about every previous disclosed security vulnerability class and can use that to pattern match. And they can do it against compiled and in some cases obfuscated code as easily as source.

I think the security engineers out there are terrified that the balance of power has shifted too far to the finding of closed source vulnerabilities because getting patches deployed will still take so long. Not that the llms are in some way hampered by novel code bases.

After his stunt with the mass firings "because of AI," employees now bring prototypes, not slides, to meetings with Jack Dorsey.

These clowns live in a dreamworld created by their PAs and cronies

Would be wonderful if we could leave the blatantly transparent, false equivalencies on Facebook and Twitter where they’re more becoming of the general user base, and maybe try to be slightly more thoughtful, eh?

> You are paying to be using that limit some of the time.

This makes zero sense. I'm paying to use that limit all of the time. If that's too much for Anthropic, they are free to lower the limits or increase the price. Claiming otherwise would be false advertising.

Shhh, don't interrupt their persecution complex

I'm building desktopdeck.io a tool for creating setups of apps, config files and scripts to quickly install on Windows or Mac

Nope. I have 3 screens in an H layout, and I am deliriously happy with them;

The middle screen is BenQ RD280U; the 3:2 ratio is amazing after so many widescreen ones. Never going back to coding on a widescreen.

One Dell UQ2720Q on each side, vertically.

Dude did a Nazi salute and made a speech in support of the neonazi party in Gernany.

I think we got a few steps beyond "reasonable beliefs".

I mean, perhaps it is reasonable for you, but then we will find very little common ground.

none of them are making any money yet. they all lose.

I wouldn't count 2-3 downed jets across many thousands of sorties "working quite well", no.

I read and enjoyed the book " what is real" by Adam Becker that talks about this intersection between the philosophy of the day and its impact on what more considered valid interpretations of QM at the time and into the future. The logical positivists had a lot of impact on popular conception of quantum stuff, even to this day. Great read

Yes, the article is deliberately misconstruing that.

The author says outright in her comments that the aim is not to engage with what Marc actually meant, but to chastise him for bad thoughts expressed on Twitter:

“I get where you’re coming from - and I’m not sure I’d disagree with Marc, if that were the point he made. But his hours // days long crash out on Twitter I think made it clear that a lack of introspection was certainly at work…”

Update 13hr later: I was able to claim my credit.

> I work on 3D/4D math in F#. As part of the testing strategy for algorithms, I've set up a custom agent with an F# script that instruments Roslyn to find FP and FP-in-loop hotspots across the codebase.

I don't know if there is an equivalent in Roslyn, but in Julia you can have the agent inspect the LLVM output to surface problems in hot loops.