I asked Wendy about her process, as well as a painter who took her workshop (thank you Allison!), and it seems pretty straight forward technically, atleast for the figures. For quick studies, she works wet on dry- you can tell by all the hard edges. Besides, this would be the only way to control things if you were completing a piece in 5 minutes or less. For longer pieces, she wets the paper down with water, preserving highlights if need be. She paints flat, and generally doesn't use clips. Wendy paints directly without drawing (again, atleast for the figurative work- although I see no pencil work in her landscapes and architectural paintings either), putting in middle values that she then lifts color out of. While it's still wet, she drops her darks in for richer shadows. As things begin to dry, she gets her hard edges, if she hasn't preserved the hard edge from the beginning. Once the water cycle is finished, she then rewets as need be for new soft edges, or she goes in for additional detail here and there, where the paper is dry. You can see this around the 2:00 mark in the video, where she's doing the feet of the nude she's working on- all the edges are dry by then, and she's able to get more control.
In terms of materials, she obviously paints tonally, and uses a mix of Sepia and Brown Madder, which she seems to shift the balance of, depending on her subject. For her quicker studies, she uses Fabriano Ingres and BFK Rives papers (probably cheaper and easier to get a lot of), and for longer studies uses Arches. From looking at the video, most of the figures fill a quarter sheet, with the multi-figure pages being approximately the same as a half sheet. So the figure work isn't too small. Allison (her student at the workshop with whom I spoke) noted that Wendy sometimes used a block as well, so she didn't seem very dogmatic about things. It seemed more about availability, and ease of use.
Cityscapes-
Both from my email exchanges, and from the paintings themselves, it's clear that there is a desire for clear observation, that clear observation will guide a painting a long way down the path to success, and that approach bears itself out when you notice how certain elements of her paintings demonstrate a great deal of precision. The paintings she does of statues and buildings show this to maximum effect. A lot of modern urban watercolor work aims for a vigorous, sketchy style, where the goal is to simplify and take command of hard, deep shadows. However, Wendy's work, in my opinion, takes a different approach. despite the wet into wet work you see in the trees and shadows, her architectural work generally demonstrates a delicate attention to detail, cornices and roofing, overhangs and windows, etc. much of which she renders in controlled half-tones. The marriage of those modulated values with these two approaches- a soft, painterly approach to wet-into-wet shadows and a delicate attention to precise detail- makes the paintings feel very true to life without feeling like a rendering.
The cityscapes remind me most of some of Sargent's work, which I mean as a high compliment. Sargent's brushwork is much more staccato in style, while Wendy's uses soft edges to greater effect, but both seem to have an affinity for bonding very precise architectural detailing with loose painterly passages, all while generally working in modulated tones.
STEPHEN BERRY ART