Showing posts with label david frum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label david frum. Show all posts

Friday, 21 January 2011

Sarah Palin - Some recent videos you shouldn't miss!


Here at Palingates, we haven't posted a great number of videos recently, despite the fact that several very revealing, funny and thoughtful clips have already been published in 2011.

So let's take a look at some of the recent videos which in my opinion are worth watching. Well, let's start with a clip which has become an instant classic in the "demagogue" department - Sarah Palin's defence of her "blood libel speech" on Hannity (click here for a clip of the "blood libel speech"). This is without any doubt one of the most revealing interviews Sarah ever did, and caused devastating reactions. Even if you usually cannot stand to watch Palin, this is a must-see:



One of the best reactions to this atrocious performance came from Jon Stewart:

The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
Petty Woman
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire Blog</a>The Daily Show on Facebook


Stephen Colbert presented a hilarious performance as well - "Mika's Palin fatigue":

Jane Hamsher from FireDogLake and Dave Weigel also had some very interesting things to say:




Joan Rivers talked on the Joy Behar Show about how she was un-invited by Fox News after she made a joke about Sarah Palin:




This clip caught my eye: David Frum (Republican journalist) and David Korn (Mother Jones) discuss Sarah Palin's blood libel speech - both are excellent:




Finally, one clip which impressed me recently: Howard Stern's rant about Sarah Palin after her "blood libel speech." Well, I am aware that opinions about Howard Stern are certainly divided, as he causes controversies on a regular basis, and also uses swear words on a regular basis. In this clip, he uses the "c"-word, for example. If this is too much for you, please don't listen to this clip.



This is our video collection for today, I hope that there was something "in it" for everyone!

.

Saturday, 24 April 2010

Weekly Sarah Palin roundup and report from the anti-Palin protest rally in Eugene, Oregon on April 23, 2010

Weekly roundup

Guest post by Blueberry Tart

Hello again, Palingaters; Blueberry Tart here with a roundup of the news of the past week (or so) in Palin-la-la-land. My “week” actually began with my own first foray into guest-posting on Palingates, with my report and photos from the Tea(bagger) rally in Boston last week. It’s been a busy week at Palingates since then (as usual); here is a quick recap:

1. The roundup begins with mxm’s excellent guest post, providing a detailed analysis of the first quarter 2010 report from SarahPAC. Some of the key findings: the PAC took in a little less (~$400K) than it paid out in the first quarter ($409K+). The biggest expenditures were for consultants (almost $300K), with very little going to support political campaigns ($9500). Sarah’s promise that her fees from the Tea(bagger) Party Convention in Nashville seems to be another false promise, as there is no evidence that she reinvested her fee in that cause.

The updates to the post include questions about the legality of some of the expenses, such as the payments to Thomas Van Flein’s law firm (PAC funds cannot pay personal expenses). Also, there is a list of all the donors at the $5000 level. Great work sorting through and organizing this information by mxm!

2. This wealth of information about SarahPAC led to several excellent follow up posts. The first, by Patrick and Kathleen, was about Kim Daniels, one of the PAC’s payees ($21,000 this quarter), who is an evangelical attorney at the ultra-Christian Thomas More Law Center. The post has a chilling video about this organization; if you haven’t seen it, you should, but be forewarned that it might give you nightmares. Among other things, the TMLC has filed a legal challenge against the individual mandate provision of the new health insurance reform legislation. Kim Daniels is apparently paid by SarahPAC to write a daily briefing report for Sarah.

3. Next was a comic interlude by Danielle Crittenden (recently ousted Republican political consultant David Frum’s wife), who entertained us with tweets from Palin’s speech in Hamilton, Ontario. Her tweets were biting and especially fun to read, coming from a dyed-in-the-wool conservative. And honestly, if you have not read the transcript of the speech, you really should get yourself an adult beverage and indulge in an almost out-of-body experience (happily, you won’t have to listen to THE SHRIEK), bordering on the paranormal. Beginning with Sarah apparently confusing “Buenos Aires” with “buenos días,” this speech almost gives the resignation speech a challenge in terms of its pure chaos, random juxtapositions and lack of intelligible communication.

4. Back to business with Eye on You’s inquiry about how Krobar (Kurt Robar) earned $51,405 in the first quarter, when it appears that the websites that he designed are rudimentary and still “under construction.” Several commenters with expertise in the website design field offered differing opinions about whether these expenses were justifiable or not. There were theories that there may be websites already created but under wraps, awaiting the grand announcement of a run for political office (God forbid), versus other thoughts that these expenses were way out of line for any such services. One commenter who knows Mr. Robar personally vouched for him as a decent guy with a wife who is, among other things, a biting critic of Her Highness. To add another layer of confusion (so typical in everything Palin), it is not entirely clear that Mr. Robar is even aware that he was supposedly paid this much money.

5. Next, Mrs. TarquinBiscuitBarrel presented an excellent critique of Anne Kornblut’s underwhelming book, "Notes from the Cracked Ceiling", which covers Hillary Clinton’s and Sarah Palin’s failed candidacies for higher office and “what it will take for a woman to win.” Mrs. TBB gives an interesting insider view of why the MSM won’t touch babygate (or many other Palingates). She calls out the books flaws, including its apparent failure to recognize and call out the major differences in the qualifications of Hillary and Sarah – thus by implication equating them with each other. I cannot do justice to Mrs. TBB’s way with words in highlighting the books major weaknesses; my own take is that it is simplistic, primarily a regurgitation, offering nothing new in either information or insight. The commenters encouraged Mrs.TBB to work on a book on Palin, which she seems willing to do – oh, please do! There was also strong support in the comments for Palingates to pull its material together in book form – yes!

6. Rounding out my first week on the job (so to speak) is Patrick’s excellent post on the incredibly foul and disgusting, threatening messages received by California State Senator Leland Yee, due to his calls to investigate the way in contract for Sarah Palin to speak at California State University Stanislaus. His questions about whether public funds are being used for the speaking engagement apparently enraged some totally nasty lunatic fringe Palin-bots, who responded by making threatening calls and sending horrific faxes to his office. Our very own Patrick called Senator Yee’s office and received a copy of the fax and the audio clip of a highly abusive phone call, which he posted. Thanks to the efforts of PG and its readers, the story is being picked up by other sites. Hopefully PG’s great work exposing the disgusting underbelly of the radical rightwing will help to discredit these wingnuts and those who incite them.

+++

Thank you so much again, Blueberry Tart!

The weekly roundup had been written before the events of yesterday, but I am sure that you have all seen our post about Sarah's testimony in the David Kernell trial.

In addition, we have received an "on-the-spot report" and brilliant photos from our reader "Tyroanee" from the anti-Palin protests which happened yesterday in the liberal stronghold of Eugene, Orgeon. I cannot express how proud we are that so many people are willing to contribute to the Palingates community!

Also, click HERE for the special message of the week from our very own Palingates mascot!

Patrick

+++
Palin Protest Rally Eugene Oregon 2010

Guest post by Tyroanee

In Eugene we are famous for our outrageous garb, straight talk and some odd looking individuals. We are a nuclear free zone as well… but I’m sure that wasn’t presented in full to the queen of Wasilla.

So on this beautiful sunny day in Eugene Oregon my family and I had a chance to stand along side such individuals. I decided to take my two teenagers, whom hadn’t been to a protest before so they could see and hear what it is that makes some of the Palinbots tick. I was ready to take video and ask questions as to what policies interested them and in what way? There were only 4 or 5 individuals in support of Palin, they only stayed for a short time and were gone POOF.

Many Sarah protesters showed up to voice their opinion on Palin Politics, some carried signs, and others had speaker-phones. Many milled about and took pictures or video and kept to themselves, until this one particular lady showed up wagging her finger across the street and holding this sign:

Eugene pic 10

“The one without sin throw the first stone!!- said Jesus”

Now mind you I am not the one you want to start slinging bible quotes, as it has absolutely no plausible reason to be in a Palin protest… but to be honest I was looking on the ground for some stones. Was she serious? Oh very-very serious, but then so were the others, so we held our signs high because throwing rocks would be completely out of the question.

My two teenagers stood alongside with me holding up signs and cheering to the cars on 6th Ave. As the driving fans honked in support, we did have a few hand gestures directed at us, and the occasional Obama Sucks shout-out, but all in all it was a successful protest.

A few stories above us were the young waiters whom were obviously bored earning their $8.oo hr waiting to serve Palin and her merry followers $$$. As the sky literally filled with dark rain clouds as we walked to our car… Palin stood behind the transparency glass of hidden agendas, deep from the public eye they gathered to hear their queen speak; she had a roaring crowd of standing ovations from her paying admirers.

Eugene pic 9

Nothing but the best…Hilton is the dirty old building in town holding only 800 people

As we walked to our car a block away, I stopped and had to take this picture, here on the same road, in front of the same building that Sarah was to speak parked this truck:

Eugene pic 7

Eugene Oregon Has a Funny Sense of Humor

Parked right in front of the Hilton building (see windows in background) in this picture is Sarah Palin delivering her spew to her Republican supporters…?
This is why I love Oregon.

Peace to all
Tyroanee over and out for the night


+++

More pictures from the protest yesterday in Eugene, Oregon, taken by Tyroanee:

Eugene pic 1

Eugene pic 2

Eugene pic 3

Eugene pic 4

Eugene pic 5

Eugene pic 6

Eugene pic 8
.

Sunday, 18 April 2010

David Frum's wife Danielle Crittenden live-twittered Sarah Palin's speech in Canada - Open Thread

Sarah Palin's speech in Hamilton, Ontario on April 15, 2010 was a huge success, because Sarah Palin succeeded in demonstrating that the overwhelming majority of High School students in the USA would have been able to present a better speech than Sarah did.

The Canadian publication "The Globe and Mail" had the ingenious idea to published the complete transcript of the speech. It appears that the speech was taped "illegally", because as it is now "standard procedure" with many of Sarah's speeches, journalists were not allowed to bring cameras or tape recorders to the event.

The speech is a treasure - you can pick a random part and laugh for hours. ;-)

However, there is something even funnier which so far escaped the attention of the broader public. David Frum's wife Danielle Crittenden was present at this evening in Hamilton and live-twittered the speech - until her battery died.

David Frum was recently chastised by his fellow conservatives for his "Waterloo" article, which he published shortly after the healthcare reform bill passed in Congress. In this article he stated:

"Conservatives and Republicans today suffered their most crushing legislative defeat since the 1960s. It’s hard to exaggerate the magnitude of the disaster."

His wife Danielle Crittenden afterwards wrote about the fallout at Huffington Post in an article called "Put Down Your Pitchforks, People" and said:

"So fast forward to this week, when conservative hell erupted over David's now infamous "Waterloo" column on the GOP health care defeat. For days I've been sitting here in the bunker beside him (and our three dogs), watching the whizzbangs land all around. What is distressing is not the predictable hate mail he has been receiving -- and thanks to the internet, he's been receiving it in hundredfold; we've both seen that before. What is distressing (to me, anyway) are the dishonest slurs on his character and integrity by people who know him, and in some cases have known him for many years -- truly ugly suggestions that David is motivated by cynicism or sycophancy, or both. (If he were, maybe he'd still be employed...)

We have both been part of the conservative movement for, as mentioned, the better part of half of our lives. And I can categorically state I've never seen such a hostile environment towards free thought and debate -- once the hallmarks of Reaganism, the politics with which we grew up -- prevail in our movement as it does today. The thuggish demagoguery of the Limbaughs and Becks is a trait we once derided in the old socialist Left. Well boys, take a look in the mirror. It is us now."


So there we have proof that some intelligent conservatives still remain in the Republican Party.

However, little did we know that Danielle Crittenden not only has a sharp intellect, but also a devastatingly funny sense of humor. It is a lucky coincidence that the transcript of Sarah's speech in Canada has also been published, because only now can we fully appreciate the wit and humor which is contained in Danielle Crittenden live tweets from that evening.

+++

Danielle also wrote an excellent article about the evening HERE (h/t EyeOnYou). By the way, the article has greatly upset the peezoo...I see another facebook rant coming!

Excerpt from Danielle's article:

Finally, Palin surmounted the podium. The crowd gave her a standing ovation and then sat back, waiting to get their $200-per-plate worth.

Dinner speeches by politicians normally adhere to a few simple rules. The politician begins by thanking her hosts and any person in the room who might be insulted if overlooked. She follows with a couple of tested jokes. Then she speaks for approximately 20 minutes (this is key for a dinner-time speech, when the audience is tired), making no more than three key points. It’s not rocket-science.

But Palin couldn’t manage it. Her 45-minute speech rambled all over the place, from her challenges as a mother facing a teenage pregnancy and a Downs-syndrome baby to Todd’s Iron Dog racing to the tea partiers to Alaska-Canada ties, wildlife, the Al-Can highway to God helping us take back this nation and stand up for small business, to common sense solutions, to Plato telling us to be nice to others, to getting’ our economy workin’ again, to the importance of community, to ice hockey and the Olympics—in short, her familiar carpool-mother-with-Tourettes-syndrome.

It was hard to figure out whether she was working up some Christian motivational routine, or just kvetching about her poor treatment by the media, or trying to demonstrate her political cred by hitting the right “facts” about Canada-U.S. relations.

If you tried to parse it, you couldn’t. There was not a single memorable line, not a single new political idea, not a single proffered solution beyond the cliché of “needing new solutions.” And when the moderator “opened the floor to questions, guess what? Even those questions had to be written down by the tables and submitted in advance, to be selectively chosen by the moderator. Our table mischievously submitted, “Who is your favorite Canadian Prime Minister?” but for some reason it wasn’t asked.
.