Ever wonder why 10+ million died during the Holocaust, despite the existence of ZIonism?

We've seen how "holocaust education" is supposed to teach "anti-semitism", not to condemn genocide. We've also seen that the Zionists didn't care about the Allied War effort (The assassination of Lord Moyne). After the war, the Zionists proceeded to ethnic cleanse the Palestinians (see the film to Tantura).

Also, check out the work of Leni Brenner, Tony Greenstein, Alan Hart, and Ilan Pappe.

Anyway, here's the answer. 

https://www.timesofisrael.com/yitzhak-shamir-why-we-killed-lord-moyne/amp/%7Cwebsite=Times/

"Never again" only applies to Jews.

Zionists don't get that saying "Never again" is totally meaningless if it only applies to Jews. And Jews weren't the only people who suffered under the holocaust.

But if they want Yad Vashem (the Israeli Holocaust museum) to be next door to Deir Yassin, site of Jewish ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, then they are pretty clueless about the topic.

And why the ethnostate of Israel needs to go.

If it was wrong for the Germans to have done, then it's really wrong for Jews to do now.

Sarah Translated:

The best political ad that needs to be seen

Introducing #AZAPAC, the Anti-zionist America Political Action Committee. If we are going to talk about independence and making America Great Again, then the US needs to put the US first: not support a rogue state in the middle east which has destabilised the region since at least 1947. 

Given they helped the German War effort (look up the assassination of Lord Moyne and Havaara Agreement,  along with the work of Leni Brenner, Tony Greenstein, and Alan Hart) and how they use the Holocaust to stir up fear. 

Yet, they can commit Genocide while saying never again.

It's time to make AIPAC register as to what it is an agent of a foreign state whose interests run contrary to those of the US.

And the word is...

I asked in a previous post what was a "Word for extremely overstretched, overwhelmed???

And "Corybantic" is indeed the word.

Corybantic means wild, frenzied, or uncontrolled, often used to describe music and dancing that is ecstatic or agitated. It is derived from the Corybants, who were priests of the goddess Cybele known for their emotional and energetic rituals.

I'm memorialising it so it's not forgotten.

Former Maine State Senate President Majority Leader Rick Bennett on the two party system

 OpenPrimaries is having a video chat with Rick Bennett on this topic:

“I’m running as an independent because Maine’s next chapter can’t be dictated by party bosses in Washington or by the special interests pouring dark money into our elections. Too many politicians today are more focused on partisan point-scoring than problem-solving. The system thrives on conflict, not resolution, and the issues that matter most – housing, our economy, our schools – get lost in the noise.”

I definitely agree with him as my posts on the duopoly and US politics bear out. It's nice to see someone admit that they cannot work within the duopoly system, especially if they were a part of it.

I may be comment adverse, but I have been known to sign petitions to get candidates and parties on the ballot that I do not support. Especially since that's about the only way to break the duopoly lock on the electoral process.

It's time to consider moving to open source. (Billionaires Owning Everything Just Got Worse…)

I am thoroughly amazed that the information sector didn't go to open source for a lot of reasons. But this person points out how much we give up by supporting big tech. 

For that matter, this gives a really good reason to get a true multiparty democracy since the duopoly did eff all to prevent this. 

Word for extremely overstretched, overwhelmed???

 I just got off the phone with Dog Gone (yes, she's still around) and we were trying to figure out a word she used to describe how I tend to do way more things at once than most people do. Not boasting since it's way more of a fault than an asset.

On the other hand, it would be nice to remember the word.

I'm thinking it may be "corybantic". 

Yeah, I would have picked Henry VIII...

There's a joke about the Russian Tsar during the Kievan Rus picking a religion: 

The Tsar calls for representatives of all the world's religions to tell him about their faiths. The Islamic representative tells him that he will go to heaven and have 72 virgins if he dies for the faith.
--"Yeah, go on..." --"You can have as many wives as you want" The Tsar is getting interested. --"but have to give up eating pork." goes on the Islamic rep --"That shouldn't be too much of a problem." 

--"And you'll have to give up drinking alcohol."
--"GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE."

 Anyway...

This does seem probable. 

The Big Beautiful Eff Up.

I don't suffer from Trump Derangement Syndrome, but I do have to wonder how someone with a CV like his could become US President once, let alone twice. For example, Donald Trump's business ventures filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection six times between 1991 and 2009, primarily involving his casino and hotel operations. These bankruptcies allowed his companies to restructure their debts while continuing to operate.

He made his "fortune" using other people's money.

And pushing the envelope.

In this case he's building a questionable multimillion dollar project on the US White House during the middle of a government shutdown. People are doing without services while he builds something which will not last.

I'm not sure that is a real tribute to US political stability.

The issue that the White House is a historic building factors in as well. I've lived in historic districts pretty much all my adult life. In one house, I was severely limited as to what I could do to the exterior: any changes had to be approved by a committee. I now live in a very modern house, yet it is also historically protected as part of post-War reconstruction! There are some really ugly houses that are practically untouchable due to that protection. Fortunately, mine isn't that protected despite it's "historic significance".

 Some historic listings even limit what one can do to the interior.

Yet, Trump can destroy a significant portion of the US White House with no problem.

Do you wonder why people are questioning this? 

The US isn't fascist, it's an Oligarchy and has been for some time. It's quietly been one. The wealthy have lived in their mansions in peace for some time, although the large mansions are becoming difficult to keep: even for the super wealthy.

The real wake up call was the 2016 election where Bernie Sanders was sidelined for Hillary Clinton, resulting in Trump being President. Amusingly, this happened through the electoral college: an institution meant to prevent such occurrences.

There needs to be a significant change in US politics, but I don't see that happening in an Oligarchy. 

 

'Wha’ll be king but Charlie' - Scottish Jacobite Song

There's a lot of irony here in using a Jacobite song: especially since the movement is pretty much dead. Unless you're a septic or out of touch with the world. 

On the other hand, the current King is Charles, which was a poor choice for a name since Kings named Charles haven't had good runs so far.

He should have gone with Arthur.

But, the first Charles did rule during the start of the English Civil War, which is similar to the Civil War that is brewing in the US. One where the Constitutional power will be divided up to put paid to the myth of three equal branches. 

Any Parliamentary system needs to have the power in the legislative branch with a weak executive head of state.

Otherwise, it does seem appropriate since Trump isn't very much of a leader. He's the cartoon villain. The heel of World Wrestling Entertainment kayfaybe. 

AI is denying your healthcare (and it's getting worse)

More on why I think that Luigi Mangione is a total dickbrain. I mean he's supposed to be this tech genius, but he missed that it's Artificial Intelligence that is causing health care to deny claims. Lots more on this topic, but things would be vastly different if he had gone the AI route rather than blaming a human who was doing a job.

A new, far more evil set of players come up.

But they are harder to hit: especially if he's working solo. 

If Cryptocurrency Was Honest | Honest Ads

This is a humourous take on why crypto is a scam. 

And Robert Reich giving a more serious take on this issue.

How to break the two-party hold on American politics

The problem with the "no Kings" movement is that they have no idea what they are talking about, which I affirm as someone who has lived in monarchies (UK, Canada, and Belgium). 

The real issue is the duopoly, which is realy only one party pretending to be different. The duopoly is the tool of the oligarchy, which is disgustingly obvious if one wants to admit it.

The US needs new players and parties that actually represent the people.

Digital Blackout: AWS Outage Plunges Millions into Disarray, Revealing the Internet's Fragile Core

The internet would be much better if it were decentralised and out of the hands of the oligarchs. As this points out, it's only as strong as its weakest link: which seems to be the oligarchs.

The fallacious thinking of the "No Kings" anti-Trumpers

 It’s nice to say ignorant things like « no kings » when Canada has a king and things are much better. The even more important aspect of that is that Canada IS BRITISH NORTH AMERICA!

Anyway, your tweedledum-tweedledumber two party system is responsible for the issues you decry: not just Donald Trump.

As is the US Constitution, which gave you the first Trump administration through the electoral college.

And for that matter, you might want to look up the history of the insurrection act and how that « trumps » posse comitatus. 

So, you need to work to destroy the oligarchs and the two party system if you seriously want to get the power in the hands of the people.

Only a real multi party democracy will do that.

A Canadian view on "no kings"

Just remember that Canada is British North America and you don't need to take a guess about alternative history.

And you would be having new elections if you were like Canada and still had a king.

 

What if America had More Political Parties? - TLDR News

There are many advantages to ending the duopoly, but I am not sure I would go with the parties and the leaders proposed by this. While I talk about the Westminster system, coalition governments are much better than the gridlock which is endemic to the US system.

The fallacious thinking of the "No Kings" anti-Trumpers

They are ignorant of the fact that you would be having new elections if you still had a king because you would be under the Westminster system. Failure to pass a budget bill requires that the government disolve because of Loss of supply, which implies a loss of confidence in that system.

Toss in that Prince Andrew has been stripped of his titles and honours (except that of prince) because of his association with Epstein by King Charles.

Think about that when you say ignorant things about having a Constitutional Monarch.

Also, realise that the taxes levied by Britain on the Colonies were the bill for the war caused by George Washington. I'm sure things could have come to a screeching halt had the British asked for money up front instead of letting things slide during that conflict.

Just look up Benjamin Franklin's Albany Plan of Union for how the British could have stopped any seeds of independence arising.

Because you might be living under a French system where militarised police (Gendarmes) are the norm had the British not funded the defence of the colonies.

Think about that.

There's a reason this man is looking so smug.

Windows 11 Is a Lost Cause. Truly Destined for the Garbage. Don't Upgrade.

I am amazed that hacker, open source culture didn't prevail in the computing world. 

Wozniak v Jobs

The old Apple II, which was something you could configure anyway you wanted. The iPod that allowd you to listen to YOUR music, not something pushed on you.

Like having Rachel Maddow invade my French Jazz playlist. PUTAIN DE MERDE!  Je me fous complètement de la politique américaine.

 OK, maybe the last statement isn't exactly true.

But, I don't want tech oligarchs running my life. 

 

Meet Hugh Jeffreys, a right to repair advocate

I want to give a shout out to this person since he caught my eye with a video about fixing an old MacBook Pro. This, of course, would be something of interest to me since one thing leading to electronics ending up in landfills is planned obsolescence. 

And there are lots of reasons electronics shouldn't be ending up in  the waste cycle, but the tech giants couldn't cre less about your health and well being. So, heavy metals (and I'm not talking music) in the environment isn't something they are too bothered by.

So, good on you, Hugh!