Some computer science researchers are using AI to peer review papers — and cheating the reviews by hiding instructions for AI ...

Hidden AI prompts were reportedly found in 17 research papers from 14 academic institutions globally, including Columbia ...

It’s not clear how widespread the new cheating strategy is, but it’s highlighting longstanding drivers of the peer review ...

Academics may be leaning on a novel strategy to influence peer review of their research papers — adding hidden prompts designed to coax AI tools to deliver positive feedback.

Self-correction is fundamental to science. One of its most important forms is peer review, when anonymous experts scrutinise ...

The study, from MIT Lab scholars, measured the brain activity of subjects writing SAT essays with and without ChatGPT.

Unlike the West, where universities are still agonizing over how students use AI in their work, top universities in China are ...

The author says they can complete a review using this approach in 30–40 minutes, or even faster if the paper is obviously flawed. AI is transforming peer review — and many scientists are worried ...