Abstract
Unlike the traditional approaches that describe and define antonymy on the basis of semantic properties of antonymous pairs in a language system, antonyms are in this paper considered with reference to their roles in actual language use. Antonymy has traditionally been regarded as a paradigmatic relation, but recent studies of antonym co-occurrence in electronic corpora of English and Serbian have identified two major and four minor functions of antonyms in discourse, with its accompanying lexico-syntactic patterns, matching the results of similar analyses in Japanese, Swedish, and Dutch. This paper aims to investigate the performance of three antonymous patterns in retrieving contrastive terms and the possibility to create the contrastive profile of given seed words in Serbian written discourse by means of those patterns. It also examines whether there is a relation between the markedness distinction between members of the antonymous pair and the position of the chosen seed word (i.e., whether it comes in the X or the Y position in the pattern). Results of the study show that it is possible to create the textual profile of antonyms using these lexico-syntactic constructions, and that the unmarked member has a richer contrastive profile in text.
Acknowledgements
I wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that have contributed to the quality of the manuscript.
References
Cruse, David A.1986. Lexical semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Fellbaum, Christiane.1995. Co-occurrence and antonymy. International Journal of Lexicography8(4). 281–303.10.1093/ijl/8.4.281Search in Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele.1995. Constructions: a Construction Grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. & K.Ruqaiya Hasan.1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Steven.2002. Antonymy: A corpus-based perspective. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203166253Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Steven.2006. Antonym co-occurrence in spoken English. Text and Talk26(2). 191–216.10.1515/TEXT.2006.009Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Steven.2007. ‘Opposites’ in discourse: A comparison of antonym use across four domains. Journal of Pragmatics39(6). 1105–1119.10.1016/j.pragma.2006.11.019Search in Google Scholar
Jones, Steven & M.Lynne Murphy.2005. Using corpora to investigate antonym acquisition. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics10(3). 401–422.10.1075/ijcl.10.3.06jonSearch in Google Scholar
Jones, Steven, M.LynneMurphy, CaritaParadis & CarolineWillners.2012. Antonyms in English. Construals, constructions and canonicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139032384Search in Google Scholar
Justeson, John S. & Slava M.Katz. 1991. Co-occurrences of antonymous adjectives and their contexts. Computational linguistics17. 1–19.Search in Google Scholar
Justeson, John. S. & Slava M.Katz. 1992. Redefining antonymy: The textual structure of a semantic relation. Literary and Linguistic Computing7. 176–184.10.1093/llc/7.3.176Search in Google Scholar
Karaman, Burcu I.2008. On contronymy. International Journal of Lexicography21(2). 173–192.10.1093/ijl/ecn011Search in Google Scholar
Kostić, Nataša. 2011. Antonymous frameworks in Serbian written discourse: Phrasal contexts of antonym co-occurrence in text. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics47(3). 509–537.10.2478/psicl-2011-0027Search in Google Scholar
Kostić, Nataša. 2013. Antonimija u diskursu [Antonymy in discourse]. Podgorica: University of Montenegro Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne.1985. Markedness and antonymy. Journal of Linguistics21(2). 397–429.10.1017/S002222670001032XSearch in Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne.2002. Gradable antonymy and complementarity. In David A.Cruse, FranzHundsnurscher, MichaelJob & Peter R.Lutzeier (eds.), Handbook of Lexicology, 498–506. Berlin: de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Lehrer, Adrienne & KeithLehrer.1982. Antonymy. Linguistics and Philosophy5(4). 483–501.10.1007/BF00355584Search in Google Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian. 2002. Understanding semantics. London: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar
Lyons, John.1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Mettinger, Arthur.1994. Aspects of semantic opposition in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Muehleisen, Victoria & MahoIsono.2009. Antonymous adjectives in Japanese discourse. Journal of Pragmatics41(11). 2185–2203.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.037Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, Gregory L. & Jane M.Andrew. 1993. The conceptual basis of antonymy and synonymy in adjectives. Journal of Memory and Language32(3). 301–319.10.1006/jmla.1993.1016Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, M. Lynne. 2003. Semantic relations and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486494Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, M. Lynne & StevenJones. 2008. Antonyms in children’s and child-directed speech. First Language28(4). 403–430.10.1177/0142723708091047Search in Google Scholar
Murphy, M. Lynne, CaritaParadis, CarolineWillners & StevenJones.2009. Discourse functions of antonymy: A cross linguistic investigation of Swedish and English. Journal of Pragmatics41(11). 2159–2184.10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.040Search in Google Scholar
Room, Adrian.1988. A dictionary of contrasting pairs. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton