Compare CloudSense and Oracle CPQ 
- Users report that Oracle CPQ excels in its quoting capabilities, with a score of 9.3, while CloudSense also performs well but slightly lower at 8.1. Reviewers mention that Oracle's quoting feature is particularly robust, allowing for quick and accurate quote generation.
- Reviewers mention that CloudSense shines in ease of use, scoring 8.6 compared to Oracle CPQ's 7.6. Users on G2 appreciate CloudSense's intuitive interface, which simplifies the configuration process and reduces the learning curve for new users.
- G2 users highlight the superior quality of support for CloudSense, with a score of 8.4 versus Oracle CPQ's 7.7. Users report that CloudSense's support team is responsive and helpful, making it easier to resolve issues quickly.
- Users say that both products offer strong document creation features, but Oracle CPQ's PDF creation is rated higher at 8.5 compared to CloudSense's 8.2. Reviewers mention that Oracle's ability to customize documents with rich media enhances the overall presentation of quotes.
- Reviewers mention that CloudSense has a slight edge in configuration rules, scoring 8.1 compared to Oracle CPQ's 8.2. However, users report that Oracle's configuration rules are still effective, particularly for complex pricing scenarios.
- Users on G2 report that Oracle CPQ's approval workflow is highly rated at 8.5, while CloudSense is close behind at 8.4. Reviewers say that Oracle's workflow management features streamline the approval process, making it easier for teams to collaborate and finalize deals.
The ease of having it integrated right into SalesForce.........................................................................................................................
The implementation took very long. There was no understanding of the requirments that our business had. They developed a solution that made sence for them and we had to re-develop it to fit our business (for example: the initial design was not able to split...
- Easy integration to Salesforce.com - Mobile approvals - Customer Support - Easy adoption for users - Positive energy of entire company
It's extremely difficult to make modifications to configurators or the doc engine without coding experience. The interface is also far from user friendly. We had constant complaints from our users.
The ease of having it integrated right into SalesForce.........................................................................................................................
- Easy integration to Salesforce.com - Mobile approvals - Customer Support - Easy adoption for users - Positive energy of entire company
The implementation took very long. There was no understanding of the requirments that our business had. They developed a solution that made sence for them and we had to re-develop it to fit our business (for example: the initial design was not able to split...
It's extremely difficult to make modifications to configurators or the doc engine without coding experience. The interface is also far from user friendly. We had constant complaints from our users.