IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,9/10
1796
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler untersuchen ungewöhnliche Ereignisse aus Popkultur, Wissenschaft und Geschichte.Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler untersuchen ungewöhnliche Ereignisse aus Popkultur, Wissenschaft und Geschichte.Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler untersuchen ungewöhnliche Ereignisse aus Popkultur, Wissenschaft und Geschichte.
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I'm really disappointed White Rabbit Project ended up as meh as it was. I've always enjoyed the trio's segments on Mythbusters and while it was sad to see them leave the show, I was excited to see what they could accomplish with their freedom on Netflix. Instead, the show feels like a very high budget YouTube top ten list with occasional experiments here and there.
Each episode focuses on a general theme, such as superhero powers. Each of the three have two entries out of 6, generally with one being an experiment and the other being some small research and storytelling. At the end of every episode, the 6 entries are (supposedly?) averaged out and ranked on three criteria, like "how similar is it to the actual superpower." The problem I have with White Rabbit Project is that it doesn't play to the strengths that the trio had back in Mythbusters. Everybody works separately here, maybe showing up to an experiment as a test subject every once in a while, which is a far cry from their work in Mythbusters.
I would only recommend watching this if you have nothing else to watch and you liked the trio's work back in Mythbusters. There's definitely some good episodes in here, don't get me wrong, but even despite those good episodes, the majority of this show is forgettable.
Each episode focuses on a general theme, such as superhero powers. Each of the three have two entries out of 6, generally with one being an experiment and the other being some small research and storytelling. At the end of every episode, the 6 entries are (supposedly?) averaged out and ranked on three criteria, like "how similar is it to the actual superpower." The problem I have with White Rabbit Project is that it doesn't play to the strengths that the trio had back in Mythbusters. Everybody works separately here, maybe showing up to an experiment as a test subject every once in a while, which is a far cry from their work in Mythbusters.
I would only recommend watching this if you have nothing else to watch and you liked the trio's work back in Mythbusters. There's definitely some good episodes in here, don't get me wrong, but even despite those good episodes, the majority of this show is forgettable.
Why don't the creators of this show like science???
They seem to think that the facts and stories in the show are not interesting enough by themselves. So they try to "improve" the "boring" science with weak jokes and a dumb ranking-system. Spoiler: it's not an improvement!
If you watch this show, just skip the intro and the "outro" = the 10 minutes of wasted time where they score the different stories against each other.
That way you skip all the stupid and are left with the core: a few (mildy) interesting science-related stories, which are nice to watch.
They seem to think that the facts and stories in the show are not interesting enough by themselves. So they try to "improve" the "boring" science with weak jokes and a dumb ranking-system. Spoiler: it's not an improvement!
If you watch this show, just skip the intro and the "outro" = the 10 minutes of wasted time where they score the different stories against each other.
That way you skip all the stupid and are left with the core: a few (mildy) interesting science-related stories, which are nice to watch.
Mythbusters found out that you could not take the Build Team out of the show. Can you run a show using only the Build Team? And doing things similar to Mythbusters, without outright plagiarizing it? That's not an easy task.
And, for season one, it didn't go too well. If there is to be a second season, it will need some adjustments here and there.
The premise? Take a topic (Weirdest weapons of WW II, g-force and it's influence on humans, great escapes, just to give you examples) and pick six items related to it. Six weird weapons for example. Then, find three criteria to judge them by. Each of the three cast members takes two of them and demonstrates them. This can involve building something, like an electric car, it can be documentary footage, play scenes (some good, some bad) or a mix.
But - less nerd porn. Slightly more Byron cleavage, though (and a looong sequence of her in underwear). While Mythbusters tried, in a scientific way, to prove or disprove a myth, explaining the science behind it and showing different methods of testing them (with varying success), the White Rabbit Project lacks experimentation. More often than not, you will see experts in their fields and hobbyists demonstrating something. Quite interesting, but as six different aspects of the episode topic need their time, instead of just two or three myths, it lacks depth there.
Something is not quite right with the show. Yet. I'd love to see it succeed, though.
And, for season one, it didn't go too well. If there is to be a second season, it will need some adjustments here and there.
The premise? Take a topic (Weirdest weapons of WW II, g-force and it's influence on humans, great escapes, just to give you examples) and pick six items related to it. Six weird weapons for example. Then, find three criteria to judge them by. Each of the three cast members takes two of them and demonstrates them. This can involve building something, like an electric car, it can be documentary footage, play scenes (some good, some bad) or a mix.
But - less nerd porn. Slightly more Byron cleavage, though (and a looong sequence of her in underwear). While Mythbusters tried, in a scientific way, to prove or disprove a myth, explaining the science behind it and showing different methods of testing them (with varying success), the White Rabbit Project lacks experimentation. More often than not, you will see experts in their fields and hobbyists demonstrating something. Quite interesting, but as six different aspects of the episode topic need their time, instead of just two or three myths, it lacks depth there.
Something is not quite right with the show. Yet. I'd love to see it succeed, though.
First off this isn't Mythbusters. The format is very different, but this isn't a bad thing.
Each episode centers around a theme, where the team compares and ranks 6 loosely related ideas (e.g. speed, heists, scams, etc.) Usually, for each idea there is storytelling interspersed with builds of contraptions used in the story. It's surprisingly entertaining, however, and the team is far more entertaining than they ever were on Mythbusters, where Adam and Jamie usually worked on the main myth of the episode and the stories of the myths weren't at the forefront.
Sometimes the stories are a little rushed in order to fit all 6 ideas in, and I wish they would spend more time on the builds, however, but that doesn't ruin it for me. In Mythbusters, I didn't particularly enjoy the sections the team did, but here they're so much more interesting to listen to. This show is nice and really surprised me, as I expected it to be very different than it is. Definitely worth a watch!
Each episode centers around a theme, where the team compares and ranks 6 loosely related ideas (e.g. speed, heists, scams, etc.) Usually, for each idea there is storytelling interspersed with builds of contraptions used in the story. It's surprisingly entertaining, however, and the team is far more entertaining than they ever were on Mythbusters, where Adam and Jamie usually worked on the main myth of the episode and the stories of the myths weren't at the forefront.
Sometimes the stories are a little rushed in order to fit all 6 ideas in, and I wish they would spend more time on the builds, however, but that doesn't ruin it for me. In Mythbusters, I didn't particularly enjoy the sections the team did, but here they're so much more interesting to listen to. This show is nice and really surprised me, as I expected it to be very different than it is. Definitely worth a watch!
Sorry for the broken English
The hosts are fun and friendly and the topics cover a range wide enough to suit most anyone's taste, also it's pretty fun to watch.
But it's all very light, whenever they cover a story that I find interesting, it leaves me with an immediate need to read about the subject cuz I just haven't learned enough, there's too little information in this show.
It's a pity that this program has been built for people who have the attention span of a 2 yo... sadly it seems to be the leading trend right now.
Anyhow, it's clean fun TV that gives an incentive to learn so I'll still give it a good 7,5/10.
The hosts are fun and friendly and the topics cover a range wide enough to suit most anyone's taste, also it's pretty fun to watch.
But it's all very light, whenever they cover a story that I find interesting, it leaves me with an immediate need to read about the subject cuz I just haven't learned enough, there's too little information in this show.
It's a pity that this program has been built for people who have the attention span of a 2 yo... sadly it seems to be the leading trend right now.
Anyhow, it's clean fun TV that gives an incentive to learn so I'll still give it a good 7,5/10.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe three hosts started this project after their release from mythbusters over a salary dispute.
- VerbindungenReferenced in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Howard & Grant (2020)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How many seasons does White Rabbit Project have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Проект Белый кролик
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 48 Min.
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen