Ri-eol
- 2017
- 2 Std. 17 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,7/10
1774
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA criminal aspiring to build a casino finds himself in endless threat when a man starts imitating every single thing he does.A criminal aspiring to build a casino finds himself in endless threat when a man starts imitating every single thing he does.A criminal aspiring to build a casino finds himself in endless threat when a man starts imitating every single thing he does.
Lee Wan
- Jang Tae-yeong double
- (as Wan Lee)
- …
Handlung
Ausgewählte Rezension
Despite the cinematography is quite amazing, aesthetically-pleasing, catchy, kinda full of fun service, while it winks to Matrix's Neo, clothes and environments, to Polar and to John Wick or to the Pulp-genre, the movie doesn't deliver.
What's the first purpose of a film?
Telling a story, IMHO.
This movie failed completely as i still don't get a heck of the full plot an narrative. Literally, i didn't understand what's happened in the film.
So, if u wanna impress the audience, just by doing splendid frames and images, maybe a videoclip is more suitable.
To me, this film resulted only as a demonstration of technical ability, without a solid story, a smart editing, a clear core. Screenplay and storyboard are definitely too lacking to the point of no return, till the viewer is lost cos he doesn't get the story and the characters, not even in the end obviously. Narratively speaking it is a total mess, confused and bad developed. Also some non-sense planted randomly.
And it almost feels like this confusion and lacking in the storytelling are wanted: wanted to create sophistications, some sort of elegance and unpredictability.
Well, sorry, but no, it doesn't work this way. Trying to be vague, misterious, skipping to different times, with flashbacks, dreams and oneiric moments is not enough to deliver style and refinement.
U gotta have soul in what you are telling, you gotta win the heart of the audience and in order to do so, u gotta let them to identify, to be moved, to empathize with what you are presenting to them.
There can't be empathy, where comprehension can't lean and root.
Not even when your goal is to create something intimate, private or totally open to free interpretations. When u wish that, u still need to give a "key" of understanding for audience to interpret your creation by its own way.
Otherwise, it is just a showoff of cameras, shots and CG.
Not impressed by the acting also: it is okay, not great. Mainly cos the roles lack in deep characterization and motives and... again... it is a failure in the script.
Good soundtrack and sound editing, very bad volume mixing though.
A great pity, it could have been a big deal... it is not.
What's the first purpose of a film?
Telling a story, IMHO.
This movie failed completely as i still don't get a heck of the full plot an narrative. Literally, i didn't understand what's happened in the film.
So, if u wanna impress the audience, just by doing splendid frames and images, maybe a videoclip is more suitable.
To me, this film resulted only as a demonstration of technical ability, without a solid story, a smart editing, a clear core. Screenplay and storyboard are definitely too lacking to the point of no return, till the viewer is lost cos he doesn't get the story and the characters, not even in the end obviously. Narratively speaking it is a total mess, confused and bad developed. Also some non-sense planted randomly.
And it almost feels like this confusion and lacking in the storytelling are wanted: wanted to create sophistications, some sort of elegance and unpredictability.
Well, sorry, but no, it doesn't work this way. Trying to be vague, misterious, skipping to different times, with flashbacks, dreams and oneiric moments is not enough to deliver style and refinement.
U gotta have soul in what you are telling, you gotta win the heart of the audience and in order to do so, u gotta let them to identify, to be moved, to empathize with what you are presenting to them.
There can't be empathy, where comprehension can't lean and root.
Not even when your goal is to create something intimate, private or totally open to free interpretations. When u wish that, u still need to give a "key" of understanding for audience to interpret your creation by its own way.
Otherwise, it is just a showoff of cameras, shots and CG.
Not impressed by the acting also: it is okay, not great. Mainly cos the roles lack in deep characterization and motives and... again... it is a failure in the script.
Good soundtrack and sound editing, very bad volume mixing though.
A great pity, it could have been a big deal... it is not.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Real?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Real
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 2.984.948 $
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 17 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen