Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA lonely widower finds a mysterious video on his computer that leads him to an abandoned town occupied by an ominous entity.A lonely widower finds a mysterious video on his computer that leads him to an abandoned town occupied by an ominous entity.A lonely widower finds a mysterious video on his computer that leads him to an abandoned town occupied by an ominous entity.
- Auszeichnungen
- 6 Gewinne & 10 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
SPIRITS IN THE DARK presents the thoughts of a lonely widower, recorded via camera mostly in a first-person perspective, who is drawn to an abandoned town by a mysterious video. Once there, he encounters strange events.
This is an extremely slow-paced movie that places heavy emphasis on a moody atmosphere. And in that, it partially succeeds, both because the director has a good eye for composition and color, and because the abandoned setting he chose is naturally well-suited for that purpose.
Unfortunately, there is just too little going on to provide a payoff for most people. As the protagonist goes through the abandoned buildings, watching the movie begins to feel like watching someone play a sandbox video game. There certainly are people who enjoy this, but this is a movie, not twitch!
I think the director was intentionally going for an excessively contemplative approach, but if that is the aim, then the contemplations have to be of such a high caliber that they themselves provide a payoff to the audience. In this case, they don't, in my opinion.
The ending was both anticlimactic and a bit confusing, but not necessarily unpredictable. There is a possible suggestion that the child he finds in the building is his own, stolen by the murdered woman right after the accident that killed his wife, and that much of what we see in the end are visions of a dying man, but it is not definite.
All in all, this is only recommended for people who value atmosphere in movies over everything else.
This is an extremely slow-paced movie that places heavy emphasis on a moody atmosphere. And in that, it partially succeeds, both because the director has a good eye for composition and color, and because the abandoned setting he chose is naturally well-suited for that purpose.
Unfortunately, there is just too little going on to provide a payoff for most people. As the protagonist goes through the abandoned buildings, watching the movie begins to feel like watching someone play a sandbox video game. There certainly are people who enjoy this, but this is a movie, not twitch!
I think the director was intentionally going for an excessively contemplative approach, but if that is the aim, then the contemplations have to be of such a high caliber that they themselves provide a payoff to the audience. In this case, they don't, in my opinion.
The ending was both anticlimactic and a bit confusing, but not necessarily unpredictable. There is a possible suggestion that the child he finds in the building is his own, stolen by the murdered woman right after the accident that killed his wife, and that much of what we see in the end are visions of a dying man, but it is not definite.
All in all, this is only recommended for people who value atmosphere in movies over everything else.
Yes indeed, very predictable... Someone in the comments section stated that this movie "over-stayed it's welcome" and they're absolutely correct, after 45 minutes of creeping around this guy's unshakeable bravery finally got tested... Oh well, I don't have to tell you what happens next bcuz you already know next....
The concept is terrible. The execution is unbearable. Slow doesn't even begin to describe this film. Not a single word is spoken for the first 10 minutes. The "acting" is dry and emotionless. Most of the film is shot from the first person perspective and somehow that makes it even worse.
There's no understating how bad this movie is. I really want to ask everyone who gave it more than one star what they were thinking. Sure, I sat through it, but only because I wanted to give it a fair shot. No, I didn't expect it to get any better, but I have been wrong before.
There were zero redeeming qualities here. I'm actually offended that this film had the nerve to be listed in the horror genre.
There's no understating how bad this movie is. I really want to ask everyone who gave it more than one star what they were thinking. Sure, I sat through it, but only because I wanted to give it a fair shot. No, I didn't expect it to get any better, but I have been wrong before.
There were zero redeeming qualities here. I'm actually offended that this film had the nerve to be listed in the horror genre.
Absolute B Grade movie, nothing impressive.. very dull and meaningless movie... Acting is horrible and storyline is not good
Good movie to watch for the horror atmosphere created by director and also great cinematography good plot all in 70 min movie.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesDue to its unusual concept and approach, the actors have very limited screen time. Despite being the protagonist, József Gallai has less than 13 minutes, Ágota Dunai has approximately 3 minutes, Peter Cosgrove and Beáta Boldog have 90-90 seconds, while Zsófia Gallai and Gergö Elekes have less than a minute of screen presence.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Project Skyquake (2022)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 7.250 $ (geschätzt)
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 11 Min.(71 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen