Red Forrest

Read a review here that said "the acting wasn't bad". In what planet? Modern day people acting mostly okay. People from the early 1500's acting beyond laughable. Or to put it mildly extremely lousy! Among my favorites was the guy with a deep southern accent playing a person from Spain. So why the high review, laughed through most of the movie, especially when the devil was talking to the priest.

Don't waste your time. Acting, horrible, story horrible. I'm still trying to figure out what the Knights Templar are doing fighting Indians in the old west. Wrong century dude! As a reviewer stated earlier, someone must have a lot of friends for a 9.6 rating. False ratings do more harm than good in the long run.

I am going to give my honest opinion I think the movie was good considering a lot of factors. Got an email from a really good friend the other day asking anyone with an IMdB account to please watch the feature and review the movie also on Amazon. Or start an account or even start a prime membership and cancel to watch the film and get the actors paid.

I think this is the first use of IR photography in any horror film. Saw the other reviews and feel they are nonsense. There are so many bad movies out there and this is not one of them. Hell even checked a few of these guys out seems like trolls. All bad reviews come on guys!! It isn't great by any means but it is good. I got to say any indie filmmaker is going to have to work with what was given.

In the email I did see the budget they worked with, and going back in forth with my buddy who knows the guys doing it told me of all the problems they encountered. So I am giving it 8/10 stars. I think with no money in the budget and giving a percent to all actors, crew, and people involved deserves some recognition. I am going to check out a few other titles some friends told me about, and give a review on those and hopefully take nights and weekends to start working on doing some reviews for some indie filmmakers.

To the other reviewers saying how did they get stars or reviews? I guess I am proof they have ask thousands of people to give an honest review and even took time to to respond to my questions about how they even pulled off a film like this with no budget. So there you go I hope a few others right in that got the email request to do a review, instead of taking the easy road and just giving a quick pick rating. A quick pick rating doesn't help anyone out people should take some time and do a quick review!!

They ask me to give an honest review and I am. Sorry if I seem like an ass but I think it deserves 7/10 stars. Saw some reviews like 1 star. Have you seen Troll 1 or 2, Jason X, House of Wax, Birdemic and The Room? Those are embarrassments that had real funding. Those deserve 1 stars.

Got an email from a very close friend who Directed the movie and said give an honest review. He told me to watch it on Amazon, and rate it there and IMdB as well. So I am this one seems easier than the instructions he sent for Amazon.

Well I know all the problems that went on with the film hell I am going to invest in a film with these guys soon. I know the budget was under $7k, hell maybe under $5K. I was just going to leave a ranked review and move on but some 1 star reviews prompted me to make a statement.

The director told me he personally thinks the film deserves 3-5 star review out of 10. I am just here saying I know the struggles, I hope people watch it and I hope everyone makes there money back and more. Its really not that bad of a film, its not the greatest film either.

I can't come up with anything to say about this movie except it's horrible. It's so bad I couldn't finish it. To make matters worse are the high reviews, obviously from cast and friends, trying to pass it off as watchable. All you are accomplishing is making fools of yourselves and deceiving viewers.