Fortsetzung des Films 2018, 'A Quiet Place'.Fortsetzung des Films 2018, 'A Quiet Place'.Fortsetzung des Films 2018, 'A Quiet Place'.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Nominiert für 1 BAFTA Award
- 14 Gewinne & 44 Nominierungen insgesamt
Stefania Warwick
- Woman at Game
- (as Stefanie Warnick)
Alice Sophie Malyukova
- Girl at Marina
- (as Alice Malyukova)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This one picks up where the first one ended. There is a small backstory about the first day the creatures landed on earth. Director John Krasinski builds suspense through pacing, a slow buildup to when someone, as careful as they are, inevitably makes a loud noise that unleashes the slaughter. Krasinski likes to use wide angle shots of people running for their lives as the monsters fly into the frame. Silence is followed by a cacophony of screams.
We see more of the creatures this time, a sort of reptilian extraterrestrial concoction. Newcomer Cillian Murphy plays a survivalist who has lost everything. But the strength of the first A Quiet Place, as with the sequel, are the emotional, powerful performances from Emily Blunt, and her onscreen children, played by Millicent Simmonds and Noah Jupe. Simmonds especially, blends courage and compassion, garnering our support, so that she becomes the hero.
The ending leaves the door open to a third installment.
We see more of the creatures this time, a sort of reptilian extraterrestrial concoction. Newcomer Cillian Murphy plays a survivalist who has lost everything. But the strength of the first A Quiet Place, as with the sequel, are the emotional, powerful performances from Emily Blunt, and her onscreen children, played by Millicent Simmonds and Noah Jupe. Simmonds especially, blends courage and compassion, garnering our support, so that she becomes the hero.
The ending leaves the door open to a third installment.
I do not understand all the bad reviews.. I see a lot of reviews saying this one was the same as the first one, I don't see it that way. It was an extension of the first one. I also see people saying that the first one was bad and that this one is even worse. Why did you want to see this one if you didn't even like the first one? Than you probably didn't even give it a chance. I thought the movie was very thrilling. The first movie was different, this one had far more action in it. But I liked both of them equally. I saw it in theaters and was on the edge of my seat the whole movie. The acting was good, there were some nice details and it was very exciting. And yes, some characters did some stupid things, but those were things that fit the characters. If you have any empathy, you can imagine how the characters would feel and why they acted the way they did. I also really liked it that they gave an insight on how it had all begun.
A good sequel, which is a rarity!
This one seemed slow at times, but the opening scene of Day 1 of the invasion, and the crazy intensity of everything at about the one-hour mark made for quite the stressful viewing, much like the original! Good ending too! I'm not clamoring for a third, but I'd watch it if they made it!
This one seemed slow at times, but the opening scene of Day 1 of the invasion, and the crazy intensity of everything at about the one-hour mark made for quite the stressful viewing, much like the original! Good ending too! I'm not clamoring for a third, but I'd watch it if they made it!
Although AQPII is not bad, it does look like an attempt to cash in. There's a few problems with it and most of them are in the storyline. Here is an overall difference with the first film:
In the first one, there was a clear storyline, almost no plot holes, novelty and the right amount of tension.
In part 2 however , you kind of know exactly what is about to happen and that lessens the film experience.
For example, the tropes used in this film, are all the classics. Yes, they were used in the 1st film too, but at least then they were timed and deployed better, so the tension was nicely built and a sense of unpredictability was evident.
Now in part 2, I have a feeling that the story was a bit of a stretch. Also, the motives of the protagonists were at times unjustified, just to push the story forward.
So the story ends up with flaws, which disappoint mostly because of the predictability and the too many cliches. I would want to mention a few which I m sure many noticed but better not to spoil it. You will know once you see.
Also, it's not as quiet as the first film. Sound editing is great also in this one, but maybe there were more speech moments than needed.
Overall, the good parts: tension is there, cinematography is beautiful once again and we get to see some good acting.
I do hope that there's a part 3 and I hope they improve the story.
6,9/10.
In the first one, there was a clear storyline, almost no plot holes, novelty and the right amount of tension.
In part 2 however , you kind of know exactly what is about to happen and that lessens the film experience.
For example, the tropes used in this film, are all the classics. Yes, they were used in the 1st film too, but at least then they were timed and deployed better, so the tension was nicely built and a sense of unpredictability was evident.
Now in part 2, I have a feeling that the story was a bit of a stretch. Also, the motives of the protagonists were at times unjustified, just to push the story forward.
So the story ends up with flaws, which disappoint mostly because of the predictability and the too many cliches. I would want to mention a few which I m sure many noticed but better not to spoil it. You will know once you see.
Also, it's not as quiet as the first film. Sound editing is great also in this one, but maybe there were more speech moments than needed.
Overall, the good parts: tension is there, cinematography is beautiful once again and we get to see some good acting.
I do hope that there's a part 3 and I hope they improve the story.
6,9/10.
If nothing else, I'm primarily impressed with how these films seem like a cinematic franchise built out of the raptors in the kitchen sequence from Jurassic Park. This is the very rare sequel that at the very least is equal to what came before and it reminded me how much I missed going to the movies.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe youngest of the Abbott family, son Beau is played by young actor Cade Woodward in the first film. In the opening flashback scenes of this second movie, Beau is played by Cade's younger brother Dean Woodward.
- PatzerThe turntable playing "Beyond The Sea" is equipment accurate for a radio station - a Technics SP-10 MKII. However, as part of the major plot point of a months long broadcast of a repeated song/signal, this model of turntable could not have been used as it is a manual turntable and has no automatic repeat function.
- Zitate
Evelyn Abbott: RUN!
- VerbindungenFeatured in Entertainment Tonight: Folge #39.157 (2020)
- SoundtracksBeyond the Sea
(La Mer)
Music by Charles Trenet
French lyrics by Charles Trenet
English lyrics by Jack Lawrence
Performed by Bobby Darin
Courtesy of Atlantic Recording Corp.
By arrangement with Warner Music Group Film & TV Licensing
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is A Quiet Place Part II?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Un lugar en silencio: Parte II
- Drehorte
- Buffalo, New York, USA(Studio)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 61.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 160.072.261 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 47.547.231 $
- 30. Mai 2021
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 297.372.261 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 37 Min.(97 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen