IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,2/10
1524
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuTwo Tokyo co-workers come across a destitute young lady in search of a place to live.Two Tokyo co-workers come across a destitute young lady in search of a place to live.Two Tokyo co-workers come across a destitute young lady in search of a place to live.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Den Ôhinata
- Jiro
- (as Den Obinata)
Tomio Aoki
- Tomio
- (as Tokkan Kozô)
Chishû Ryû
- Man on boat
- (Nicht genannt)
Hideo Sugawara
- Boy Taunting Tomio
- (Nicht genannt)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesEine Laune (1933) won the Kinema Junpo Award for best film, the second of three consecutive years an Yasujirô Ozu film won, following Ich wurde geboren, aber... (1932) and preceding Der Wanderschauspieler (1934).
- PatzerKihachi states that 50 sen to a boy his age (referring to Tomio) is like 10 ryo to him and Otome. The ryo was replaced by the yen in 1871, over 60 years earlier. (The yen replaced the ryo at par; there are 100 sen to the yen.)
However, Otome then says, "No, more like 1,000 yen!" So, it's possible "ryo" was still being used synonymously with "yen" over a half-century later.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Transcendental Style and Flatulence (2017)
Ausgewählte Rezension
Yasujiro Ozu is an extremely well respected film director. While not as famous today as his countryman, Kurosawa, among those who are fans of Japanese cinema, he is practically a god. While I have loved many of his films due to their amazing artistry and great direction, I also think that overall, many of his films are a tad overrated. In other words, because SOME films are near-perfect classics (such as both versions of FLOATING WEEDS or my favorite, LATE SPRING), people often tend to see ALL of his films as having the same quality. This is true of all the great directors, as there are a devoted group of followers that see every film as great--even if the films have obvious flaws or were made before the directors learned and perfected their craft.
I mention all this because although PASSING FANCY is a very good film, it's far from great--despite some amazingly positive reviews. While it's true that the Japanese film industry didn't switch to sound until very, very late compared to Western countries, shouldn't this be considered when giving out 10s to these silents? In other words, shouldn't technical merit be considered when reviewing a film? As such, I'd have to knock a point off the film. In addition, the film's plot is amazingly scant and a bit too ordinary.
Now in Ozu's defense, I must say that when it comes to the ordinary, nobody does it better. Here we have the story of a hard-drinking blue collar man and his young son and there's not a lot of excitement or action...but it STILL engages the audience due to his nice touch and excellent acting. In addition, the ending is very sweet and well done--even if nothing is exactly resolved in this story of very mundane individuals.
Well done and worth seeing but not exactly magical.
I mention all this because although PASSING FANCY is a very good film, it's far from great--despite some amazingly positive reviews. While it's true that the Japanese film industry didn't switch to sound until very, very late compared to Western countries, shouldn't this be considered when giving out 10s to these silents? In other words, shouldn't technical merit be considered when reviewing a film? As such, I'd have to knock a point off the film. In addition, the film's plot is amazingly scant and a bit too ordinary.
Now in Ozu's defense, I must say that when it comes to the ordinary, nobody does it better. Here we have the story of a hard-drinking blue collar man and his young son and there's not a lot of excitement or action...but it STILL engages the audience due to his nice touch and excellent acting. In addition, the ending is very sweet and well done--even if nothing is exactly resolved in this story of very mundane individuals.
Well done and worth seeing but not exactly magical.
- planktonrules
- 2. Mai 2009
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 40 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.37 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen