Double X: The Name of the Game

OK, before launching into anything lets just point out that this was made on a budget that would struggle to produce an episode of EastEnders. Filming anything on a small budget and producing something that looks this shiny, with so many professional looking stunts, should be complemented on cinematography and the sheer amount of work that is going to have gone into this production. However, that's about as far as the complements can go. The scenery and setting for the first half is brilliant, having a good looking (if slightly clichéd) car chase through Portpatrick followed up by an intriguing Tarantino like style of narrating Norman Wisdom's background involving the London mob rounded off with an eventful stand- off in an abandoned castle. It is from here on out that the film starts to fail. The American character is not well acted and up to this point, despite the nice twist, he was not heavily part of the story. Now that he is trust onto the screen as the main character, nearly every line is delivered so unconvincingly that it takes away from every scene any sense of atmosphere. Bernard Hill and Simon Ward bring a little bit of fun with their characters, even if Hills' Irish accent is a bit iffy. The music is stereotypical 90's but hasn't dated so badly that its painful to listen to, quite honestly the music timing is spot on perfect and adds plenty of tension to the most important scenes. The second half of the film is a complete let down and the steam really runs out around an hour into the running time, with too many stupid dialog plot holes and bad editing the movie ends on a note that makes you realize that after Scotland is left behind, you should just have turned it off. The ending is so abrupt it'll actually make you sit back and wonder what the hell just happened. Overall, the first half is an entertaining piece of cinema with Wisdom and Hill stealing the show alongside the stunning Scottish scenery. The stunt work is impressive for such a low budget and the music is hit and miss in providing moods. However, the rest of the cast and crew don't seem to know what they are doing and the script is so bare and corny that missed opportunities are rife throughout the entire film. Double X garners a bad reputation but its not all rightly deserved, its definitely worth a watch if nothing else is on and a must for any Norman Wisdom fans out there to see him turn his hand to a serious role - and he's very good at it.

Why do some reviewers stupidly tell u the whole story of the film? . Stick to watchable, didn't enjoy it, great movie, etc u know who you are!

It was ok , done!

O.k. i watched the film last week because lots of people said it was a terrible film and i like bad films plus i like norman wisdom and was looking forward to seeing him play a diffrent style of role than he usually plays. Wisdom plays a gangster, well a safecracker in a gang he is sort of the brains behind the operation a mild mannered quiet fellow who hasent got quite the sort of mean spirit the rest of the gang have. So the story is this, a man visiting scotland from chicago who was a policeman meets wisdom in a empty hotel restraunt, he chats to him and is interested in him somewhat (we find out why later, i dont want to give it away but it is a nice twist). Anyway wisdom is acting edgy and after the fella buts into wisdoms business wisdom takes him hostage and orders him to drive wisdom to the ferryport, while driving wisdom tells the man his story, how wisdom was a safecracker for a gang but felt they were going to kill him after his next job so he sort of set the gang up (more on that later) and ran away from the gang but not before they kidnapped his daughter hilariously tying her up and putting her in a "silence of the lambs" style dungeon conveniantly put in the basement of a club the gang member owns. So wisdom has escaped the gang but they are after him, so he has to form a unlikely truce with the american so wisdom can escape to safety but things dont exactly turn out as planned. Thats all i really can tell you as the twist about halfway through is best kept for you to watch for yourself. Now for the film itself, wisdom puts in a tired performance to be honest, if you want to see him tackle a serious role watch "going gently" or if you want to see him in a diffrent light to his usual films watch "whats good for the goose" thats a great film as its sort of a naughty sex comedy quite diffrent to wisdoms usual style of film. I think because of wisdoms previous slapstick films it can be at times difficult to take him seriously, there were numerous parts in the film where i was half expecting him to shout "MR GRIMSDALE" and fall down a set of stairs but unfortunatly it didnt happen, he was quite old in this film and im afraid it shows, theres a part in the film where he has to slap a woman and its such a feeble slap im surprized they didnt reshoot it. As for the other actors in the film the always good "bernard hill" (yosser hill from boys from the blackstuff) plays a gangster called ignatious "iggy" smith and he is a shining example of how a actor should play that sort of role, im serious his performance really makes the film so so SO good, he maniacally chews his way through every scene and is a joy to watch, he is a disabled gangster with a bad leg (ha) so bad is his leg all someone had to do when confronted by him in a scene was to push him over and he was lifeless as a darlek, he has all the good lines here whether throwing his boss out of a helicopter or taking part in hilarious slow motion gun fight in a warehouse where his bad leg seems to hilariously get better he is phenomenal in the role. Chloe annett sleep walks through her role, as do most of the actors and i think thats the main problem here because apart from bernard hill and norman wisdom (for the time he is in the film) the other actors and actresses just dont do much. So its a watchable film, but it whould have been a lot better off as a 2 part crime thriller on bbc or itv, thats the level we are at here people, a highlight for me was a ridiculously english drive by shooting where the gunmen open fire on 2 men from a bargeboat on a english river !!!!. If you do like the film another film to check out is the hilarious chris twemlow masterpiece (cough cough) the 1983 film that is g.b.h. that film is the bees knees and makes this film look like citizen kane, you have been warned.

Well. I caught this on a new satellite channel called "Badmovies.com". What can I say, it's brilliant. In that its probably the worst film ever made. Well, there are worst. I could rattle off some bigger names, but why bother. You know them already.

Back to the movie. It's a stinker. Apart from the old 'bible stuffed in the shirt' routine to avoid being stabbed and the often hysterical dialog its just about the daftest plot going. But hey! He should have stuck with being Perry Mason's side kick.

My personal favorite part is the bullet that clearly must have gone through his left lung but only left superficial damage! Then he hops into a dirty cold lake with no affects. Must be a good diet or something.

For some reason, the director remade the not very good to begin with short film 'Vengeance' almost exactly, then expanded it with a lot of gangster hokum. Throw in Norman Wisdom playing it straight (as if guest starring in The Bill), an overheated plot like a teetering Jenga stack of cliches, and on first viewing you have the kind of stinker that negated the very idea of a British film. Having seen it multiple times, however, it's virtues become apparent - top of the list being Bernard Hill, having fun as the villainous Iggy. Every actor here seems to be acting in a different film of their own. There's an ever shifting inconsistency of tone throughout - like it was written in total seriousness but the absurdity of the material made it impossible for the cast to play it straight. In fact I think most of it was made up on the spot. It's not sleazy or violent enough to be a trash classic, but is still far better and more credible than anything Guy Ritchie ever did.