IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,1/10
63.792
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein Sicherheitsprofi findet seine Vergangenheit zurück, um ihn zu verfolgen, wenn er und sein einzigartiges Team mit der Aufgabe betraut sind, einen besonders wichtigen Gegenstand zu finden.Ein Sicherheitsprofi findet seine Vergangenheit zurück, um ihn zu verfolgen, wenn er und sein einzigartiges Team mit der Aufgabe betraut sind, einen besonders wichtigen Gegenstand zu finden.Ein Sicherheitsprofi findet seine Vergangenheit zurück, um ihn zu verfolgen, wenn er und sein einzigartiges Team mit der Aufgabe betraut sind, einen besonders wichtigen Gegenstand zu finden.
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Jo Marr
- College-Aged Cosmo
- (as Jojo Marr)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesWhen Martin (Robert Redford) and Cosmo (Sir Ben Kingsley) attempt their initial prank at the beginning of the movie, the façade building seen is the famous Hill Valley clock tower from the Zurück in die Zukunft (1985) trilogy.
- PatzerThe ceiling tiles that Martin and Carl use to move around above the floors in the Playtronics building are the hanging type, quite fragile like cardboard and would not be able to support an adult's full body weight.
- Crazy CreditsIn the theatrical trailer, the case members' names were first presented as anagrams, then rearranged to spell correctly. They were: fort red border - Robert Redford a york dandy - Dan Aykroyd kneel by sing - Ben Kingsely carney mend moll - Mary McDonnell rionveih irnep - River Phoenix I edit spin yore - Sidney Poitier ad variant thirds - David Strathairn
- Alternative VersionenThe line "Who's going to save the world Marty? Greenpeace?" in the dubbed Spanish version (DVD) becomes "Who's going to save the world Marty? The military?"
- VerbindungenEdited into The Green Fog (2017)
- SoundtracksReally
Written by Mike Bloomfield & Al Kooper
Performed by Mike Bloomfield, Al Kooper & Stephen Stills (as Steven Stills)
Courtesy of Columbia Records
By Arrangement with Sony Music Licensing
Ausgewählte Rezension
I was saddened that this movie had such a low rating. I've watched it many, many times over the years, and it continues to entertain. It is, perhaps, the last good "hacker" film (well, 23 (1998) also comes to mind, but that isn't widely available in English).
The math is believable (Janek's lecture makes sense), as is the technology (except for the Hollywood-ish decryption displays -- but that's forgivable). The characters are among the most realistic in any of these movies (with the exception of Joey the lamer in Hackers (1995) -- most accurate character in a hacking movie I've seen yet). They're each composites of well-known people from the 80s security scene. The techniques they use are the techniques of the business, especially in that era.
Now that computers have become such a big thing, I don't think it would be possible for Hollywood to produce another movie like this. Anything made now would have to be far more glamorous and unrealistic.
What's this movie got, if you don't care about any of that stuff? It's tremendously funny, cleverly written (every scene works overtime to say and do more than one thing), and beautifully shot and scored. (The opening scene and transition is wonderful) The acting is priceless. I've never met someone who didn't love this film. See it.
The math is believable (Janek's lecture makes sense), as is the technology (except for the Hollywood-ish decryption displays -- but that's forgivable). The characters are among the most realistic in any of these movies (with the exception of Joey the lamer in Hackers (1995) -- most accurate character in a hacking movie I've seen yet). They're each composites of well-known people from the 80s security scene. The techniques they use are the techniques of the business, especially in that era.
Now that computers have become such a big thing, I don't think it would be possible for Hollywood to produce another movie like this. Anything made now would have to be far more glamorous and unrealistic.
What's this movie got, if you don't care about any of that stuff? It's tremendously funny, cleverly written (every scene works overtime to say and do more than one thing), and beautifully shot and scored. (The opening scene and transition is wonderful) The acting is priceless. I've never met someone who didn't love this film. See it.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Sneakers?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Sneakers
- Drehorte
- Countrywide Home Loans Corporate Headquarters, Simi Valley, Kalifornien, USA("Playtronics Corporate Headquarters")
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 23.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 51.432.691 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 10.031.145 $
- 13. Sept. 1992
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 105.232.691 $
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 6 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Sneakers - Die Lautlosen (1992) officially released in India in English?
Antwort