Some Kind of Justice

From the trenches of Central Pennsylvania comes this thriller with action, violence and not a little nudity. All the things that make life worthwhile.

The acting is quite consistent for an independent film. Young director Doug Howard gets the most out of this ensemble cast. Ed Bergtold, Conrad Martin and Kevyn Settle all turn in great performances as Jim, John and Jeppy, never letting on exactly who is inside whose head. The interplay between renegade cop Mike Lazorcik and detective Liz Tapia is fantastic, and Tapia looks to be the breakout star of the group.

The Black and White production adds to the raw and foreboding feel of the entire picture, and the background music by Progressive Dementia is top notch.

This pathetic attempt to damage the reputation of this actress is typical of the childish fanaticism of the animal rights terrorists. This actress has devoted over 40 years of her life to ANIMAL WELFARE!!! Animal Welfare or Animal Rights? Here are some of the differences: As animal welfare advocates. . .

• We seek to improve the treatment and well-being of animals.

• We support the humane treatment of animals that ensures comfort and freedom from unnecessary pain and suffering.

• We believe we have the right to "own" animals -- they are our property.

• We believe animal owners should provide loving care for the lifetime of their animals.

As animal rights activists. . .

• They seek to end the use and ownership of animals, including the keeping of pets.

• They believe that any use of an animal is exploitation so, not only must we stop using animals for food and clothing, but pet ownership must be outlawed as well.

• They want to obtain legal rights for animals as they believe that animals and humans are equal.

• They use false and unsubstantiated allegations of animal abuse to raise funds, attract media attention and bring supporters into the movement. (The Inhumane Crusade, Daniel T. Oliver)

The movie was great- I am a big fan of mysteries. And I agree that black and white is usually best (For me at least) when dealing with graphic violence.

But the animal rights twit who wrote a bad review of Elizabeth Brinkley's presence in the film, without mentioning her performance, is typical of the mindset we animal lovers see more and more daily. What does Elizabeth's fight for our right to own pets (PeTA's agenda is to eliminate all animal ownership as soon as possible- read their literature on site) have to do with a great performance in a film? The animal rights drones are ruining every aspect of life for those of us who love our pets and anyone who likes to wear something other than pleather.

This is a well put-together movie. There is more nudity and adult situations than I would normally watch. (Some scenes were very graphic!) However, the storyline and concept were very good. (The actors were also very convincing in their roles.) I always love murder mysteries. And the twists and turns in this movie are enough to keep anyone on their toes. (I had the murderer pegged as one character up until the end, and then I found out I was wrong! This is not an average "by the book" murder-mystery, but a roller-coaster of a psycho-thriller with lots of twists and turns along the way.) This is definitely an under-appreciated film. I can't wait to see more movies from this company.

PeTA = Pathetic Ethics Towards Animals.

Their motto is "Better Dead Than Fed".

Pity the NC courts didn't fry the lowlifes who acquired those poor, defenseless animals by lying, then killed them in their van and dumped them like trash.

Hypocrite thugs.

Take your pathetic attempt to throw dirt at Ms Brinkley by posting to a movie forum and stuff it. I guess you gave a rave review to the lousy PeTA-endorsed movie starring Molly Shannon.

Elizabeth Brinkley rocks.

Two thumbs up for animal WELFARE - flush the animal rightists like the turds they are.