Martin's Close

I like the idea that ghost stories and Christmas are intertwined and I was looking forward to this version of M.R James' story written and directed by Mark Gatiss. I watched "The Dead Room" last year and found that a passable short - but this one didn't work for me.

John Martin (Wilf Scolding) is on trial for the murder of village girl Ann (Jessica Temple) with whom he's being spending his time, at the expense of his reputation. Up before Judge Jeffreys (Elliot Levey) and already fearing the outcome, his case take a turn for the bizarre when the Prosecutor (Peter Capaldi) professes that the victim has been seen, since the murder.

What can I say, the performances were fine and the setting was OK. But I don't feel like the story was scary, funny or clever enough to warrant its telling. I assumed the meta element of having Simon Williams telling the story contemporarily was going to pay back into it somehow, but it didn't..

Nothing technically wrong, just a little underwhelming.

Another installment of 'A Ghost Story for Christmas' and an ultra low budget, low production scale, low production values adaptation of a lesser short ghost story from M.R. James.

I think that the intention was to use a plainly small budget and minor production to tell a smaller story in an understated, reductive manner in an effort to create an effective drama from very short measures.

Regrettably I found this adaptation to be the least engaging of all the BBC's "direct" versions of M.R. Jame's tales, both from either the original 70's run and the intermittent 21st century series; discounting the ill judged 2010 version of 'Whistle and I'll come to you' as a far looser and unfettered effort; albeit one with redeeming features.

The scenes were not at all convincingly written or directed, with basic background as well as foreground inadequacies.

The antagonist was ably acted in most scenes but everyone else seemed to be under-directed or overacting or playing their part very broadly.

I found the ghostly elements to be weaker than I could sustain faith in....particularly the appearance of the phantom itself.

The best part in terms of my enjoyment was the one well crafted and well performed scene whereby the murderer and murdered first meet and strike up and 'relationship'. I liked that little set up.

I didn't like the framing/narration device of a modern perspective provided by a contemporary character. It seemed to me to be less believable than a failed effort at a period one would have been. Although it probably has the grain of a good idea behind it: something of a reflection of M.R. Jame's own way of telling his ghost stories in a contemporaneous manner at the time that he first told them to his select audiences, I couldn't ever get engaged with the idea here.

Overall personally I can commend the effort but not the product which simply left me bored and disbelieving for far too much of its run time.

In this instance, of such a under-nourishing story, casting a black actor in a key witness role made me think of how much more interesting a brief story would of been about his character in 1680's England rather than what was actually being offered and I actually preferred to mull this effect in my mind than be engaged by the creative vision offered here.

The morale of my tale is: if you are making a limited little story don't add something far more striking and distracting and interesting than your actual story as a minor cogg in the wheel of your narrative.

3 out of 10 from me

I watched this as I am a fan of M. R. James.

Boy I now know I should have not bothered. Yes this has a high score on here but it was awful.

I cannot think of one good thing that this had in it.

I have now only started to catch up with all the horror shows on television over the Christmas holidays as I work over them.

Got to now watch Susan Hill' s Ghost Story and A Christmas Carol with Guy Pearce.

See I told you I could not think of anything good to say about this.

I don't often post my views on IMDB because I know how difficult it is to make a halfway decent drama. This one is so strangely bad that I feel I have to flag it up. It's so dud that it has the feel of a student movie and apart from the performances of Peter Capaldi and Sara Crowe there's a distinctly amateurish air throughout (Simon Williams is good but wasted as the unnecessary modern commentator). Any courtroom drama should have plenty of coverage plus a few unique angles to give the editor (and the audience) a sporting chance of a stimulating ride. In this case there's far too much in close up - you could be watching Eastenders for goodness sake! The real curse is the script which has its own spoilers built-in, no surprises anywhere and, crucially for a ghost/horror story, none at the end. That such a remarkably bad production has Mark Gatiss's name on it is plain weird. There is so much brilliant drama on British TV (often written by Moffat & Gatiss) that this is definitely an oddball orphan. Over the years the BBC has made several half-hearted attempts at Christmas ghost stories. Even the better ones seem to lack conviction, 'going through the motions' almost. Come on BBC, it a great genre, give us a cracker for 2021!

John Martin is up before a Judge, and twelve good men and true, for the murder of Ann Clark, a poor woman and easy target.

Nicely made, very well acted, just a bit on the slow side. In the same style as the great stories from yesteryear, just lacking the depth and shock factor of say, The Signalman.

Peter Capaldi was of course a big draw, and does indeed have star quality, Wild Scolding I thought was terrific as the man on trial.

I did enjoy it, if I'm honest I would say it was just a little dull, they could have added some horror, or even a few minor scares.

Enjoyable though. 6/10