IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,6/10
11.152
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine Reise in unerforschtes und verbotenes Gebiet durch drei in Raum und Zeit verwickelte Geschichten.Eine Reise in unerforschtes und verbotenes Gebiet durch drei in Raum und Zeit verwickelte Geschichten.Eine Reise in unerforschtes und verbotenes Gebiet durch drei in Raum und Zeit verwickelte Geschichten.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This is a collection of some nice scary stories. I liked the acting in general. Special effects, background music, and sound effects were awesome. In summary, if you are searching for a good quality scary movie, I recommend watching this movie.
This is the first time ive seen mysophonia referenced in a film. Both my husband and i experience it; him with mouth noises and me with water noises, and it was a realistic portrayal of how overwhelming it can be. This anthology was an unexpected find and I'm glad we gave it a go. The actings great, the stories are engaging and varied and it wasn't predictable. I know clive barkers books are visceral and complex and I certainly understand why some fans would feel short changed, but it's worth taking a look
If you're looking for a constant jumpscares fest, this is not for you. Books of Blood delivers a slow burn anthology with decent acting. Some of the stories are a little drawn out and could've done with some trimming. The pacing is where this movie suffers but it is definitely worth watching.
What shines through is that it seems to be "made for TV" .. but not like Game of Thrones or so ... but "made for early evening TV ... in the early 2000s" or sort. It never dares to go all the way. It hints at it .. it shows potential - but it backs off.
I actually liked the first story (and conclusion) .. it was kind of powerful. Scenes, images and ideas were well done - and it was a nice, sad tragedy. The other stories however felts like re-tales of older stories. They were not nearly as well done and seemed much, much cheaper - both in creativity and cinematography.
For a full length suspense/horror movie, i can only give it a low score though. The stories are not good enough - they are not intertwined cleverly .. and they never exceed a rather low budget TV format.
I actually liked the first story (and conclusion) .. it was kind of powerful. Scenes, images and ideas were well done - and it was a nice, sad tragedy. The other stories however felts like re-tales of older stories. They were not nearly as well done and seemed much, much cheaper - both in creativity and cinematography.
For a full length suspense/horror movie, i can only give it a low score though. The stories are not good enough - they are not intertwined cleverly .. and they never exceed a rather low budget TV format.
Nothing new horror wise. However, the first story goes on and on and is not well acted and takes up over half the film. The second story is much better acted and scripted, Anna Friel should have played the lead in the first story as Britt Robertson is not a strong enough actor, but that's the least of the problems. The problem is you need to watch to get the twist at the end and most will give up, I almost did but was too lethargic. As for the story running through well it is there just to link so it is what it is.
In the end, after nothing has really happened you realize you've wasted over an hour and a half for a nice twist but is it really worth it?
NO
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesBooks of Blood adapts Clive Barker's framing device story from his "Book of Blood" but also includes brand new stories written for this film that Barker was involved in creating.
- PatzerMary says Miles died at 7 years old, but the dates on his gravestone span less than 6 years.
- SoundtracksDeep Six
Performed by Marilyn Manson
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 47 Min.(107 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2:1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen