Expedition Bigfoot

Has compelling experts, credible sounding testimonies, and great methods for capturing evidence.

Problems: THE MUSIC! They play music over what the researchers are supposedly hearing during the investigation. Would love to hear what they're hearing without that stupid music.

They play through the evidence way too quickly for the viewer to judge for him or herself.

No repeat trial techniques. Some techniques seemed to produce results but they don't repeat as necessary for credibility.

When I go hunting, I dont advertise to the thing I'm hunting for that I am there by using flashlights. How do these people never use the right equipment at the right time. We will never see a "bigfoot"!!

Everytime they walk into forest they wonder why it goes silent...not realising THEY are the reason why creatures go silent !!! Arrrrrgggghhhh!!! my god that makes me so mad.

You bring in new tech to track high level odors. Everyone claims how bad the smell of a Bigfoot is. Sooo, how come u got 2 people wandering around tight mining tunnels, nobody smells anything, at end of show Bryce says he can see a figure only a few steps away from where you're filming. Did I miss the Bigfoot bath segment? Did everyone lose their sense of smell when they entered the mine? Can someone explain this, did the show forget they brought up new equipment to sniff out Bigfoot, but now they don't stink when you're right next to them. Or perhaps there was No Bigfoot in the mine tunnels! That makes more sense doesn't it?

I want to be objective and open-minded when it comes to Bigfoot/Sasquatch/Yeti, having studied Cryptozoology myself. I'm going to say that this series tries to add more of a "research" feel to it, but it fails on many fronts. I only watch it because of Dr. Mayor. I believe she is doing her best to stay the course of science. The survivalist strikes me as a man that has at least a center to him when it comes to what he's doing. By and large, true research and actual science is lacking. Too many quick conclusions based on spurious and anecdotal accounts. When hard "evidence" is found, the results are by and large inconclusive. I'm not sure if they are ghost-hunting or doing scientific research.