30 Seconds in Hell

2021
1 Std. 38 Min.

IMDb-BEWERTUNG

IHRE BEWERTUNG

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuOn October 26, 1881 a gunfight broke out on Fremont Street in Tombstone, Arizona. Within 30 seconds, 31 rounds flew at close range between the Earp brothers, and the Clantons and McLaurys. W... Alles lesenOn October 26, 1881 a gunfight broke out on Fremont Street in Tombstone, Arizona. Within 30 seconds, 31 rounds flew at close range between the Earp brothers, and the Clantons and McLaurys. Who was right? Who was wrong? Were there any heroes? Summoned from the grave by the mysteri... Alles lesenOn October 26, 1881 a gunfight broke out on Fremont Street in Tombstone, Arizona. Within 30 seconds, 31 rounds flew at close range between the Earp brothers, and the Clantons and McLaurys. Who was right? Who was wrong? Were there any heroes? Summoned from the grave by the mysterious Destiny and Ghost Rider, they'll answer for their sins, their lives, and their loves. ... Alles lesen

Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro

IMDb-BEWERTUNG

3,5/10

IHRE BEWERTUNG

5Benutzerrezensionen

Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro

Videos1

Trailer 2:02

30 Seconds in Hell Theatrical Trailer

Fotos3

Benutzerrezensionen5

3,583

Empfohlene Bewertungen

1Jacqueline_Hemingway

Two minutes of hell watching this trailer!

From YouTube video spinner Michael Giudicissi, the self-proclaimed Billy the Kid obsessor, comes this...whatever this video is. Looks like it's shot on a Sony Handycam. Horribly cast, acted and produced, this looks like something my ten year old made in junior high (and I don't have any kids!!).

Short on real action, poorly costumed actors and editing that should have remained on the cutting room floor, 30 Seconds in Hell will make viewers wish that they only had to endure this production for 30 seconds!

If you are going to watch this thing, pop some popcorn, have a drink, then go to the movies and watch something more worthwhile.

3techgician

98 minutes of Hell

This was utterly painful to watch. There was absolutely nothing cinematic about this no budget western.

The situation is just a bunch of people sitting and talking. Very little action. The acting is stale and that is being kind. The camera work is awful and the editing seemed a bit choppy and laggy at times.

This feels like a glorified student film. Nothing about this production impressed me. The most positive thing I can acknowledge were the graphic cards at the end, and the main song seems to be professionally recorded.

Slow, dull and a saddle sore western that can easily be skipped.

2pokerh-38454

Well intentioned by very flawed

There are some cool locations, but that's all I can say. The casting is quite odd as no one looks anything remotely 19th century. Especially the girl playing Earp's wife. For one, she looks too old as well as having had some work done. The others don't have the right look, hairstyles or even way of speaking. The cinematography was pretty mediocre. Overall, I don't rate this very highly and wonder what they thought they could bring to the table that Tombstone didn't.

10olmedas

Great

Great movie love the actor Ryan.he does a good job and he is sexy. Love the story line. Well definitely be watching again and recommending to other people.

2maltesefalcon

1:37 snooze fest

So many ears in this production. I want to see an actors eyes, not their ears.

Just because you have a script does not mean it is good. Does anyone ever get professional coverage done on their scripts before shooting? You definitely should on your next one.

And Director please tell you actors to stop acting.

Cleanest looking western i have ever seen!

And Jagermeister was not created until 1934.

NOT A GREAT MOVIE. SORRY.