Als die Journalistin Kim Wall verschwindet, nachdem sie an Bord des U-Boots des Erfinders Peter Madsen gegangen ist, verbirgt sich hinter seiner wechselnden Geschichte über ihr Schicksal ein... Alles lesenAls die Journalistin Kim Wall verschwindet, nachdem sie an Bord des U-Boots des Erfinders Peter Madsen gegangen ist, verbirgt sich hinter seiner wechselnden Geschichte über ihr Schicksal eine erschreckende Wahrheit.Als die Journalistin Kim Wall verschwindet, nachdem sie an Bord des U-Boots des Erfinders Peter Madsen gegangen ist, verbirgt sich hinter seiner wechselnden Geschichte über ihr Schicksal eine erschreckende Wahrheit.
- Regie
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Its an amazing coincidence (or not? - when did he know he would commit a crime, was he leaving easter eggs for the audience - it is weird) that there was a film crew in tow following Madsen right up until the day of the murder.
It was good in the sense that it showed how creepy Madsen was, hiding in plain sight, basically telling people what he was and what he was going to do, and no one noticed. It also showed the impact of his crime on all his interns and collaborators, who had recognised he was eccentric but had trust in him in terms of delivery of their project.
I understand that some of the people in the film were not happy about the final product and some voices and faces may have been changed using AI. I am really confused about that, the woman whose face is supposedly different just looks like she has a soft filter on, so I am not sure if her face is completely different or that slight blurriness is the effect. I'd actually be half tempted to google her to find out what she looks like to understand the nature of the special effect they have used, which probably defeats the object of them altering her appearance.
What was lacking was information about Kim Wall, there was barely anything, not even really proper photos, she is the victim, I would like to know a bit more about her. Also we never saw what the inside of the submarine was like.
Also, though some might not agree, for completion, I would like to know what they think happened on that submarine, a timeline of events, but there was nothing. He clearly just planned to get any female on there and kill them, and he basically told the girl who may have been his intended victim, that he had a plan, I would like to know, what happened. Did he drug her to incapacitate her? I don't know and when it comes to keeping safe from evil, it is useful to understand their methods. The actual event was not much of a feature of this documentary, it was just before and then briefly after and some reporting of the court case.
I feel like this documentary prompts more questions than it answers for a viewer who broadly knew of the murder but doesn't know all the details.
Seemed a lot like a very self assured man and the people who congregate around him to be part of it all and help. OK, so that' exactly what it was - except turns out he's a psychopathic narcissist who just wants to kill a woman or something in his sub! Sorry if there are spoilers but the description on the page says all that also.
What got me was the people around him and how shocked they were and -- you know, how could you not know something was wrong with your "friend"?? It makes it all the more harrowing to realize that these people walk amongst us and that you could KNOW someone and not know them at all, and they are like this guy. So, it was interesting to me as I had no idea about the case nor what the doc was about, didn't even notice the tag line til later. LOL Interesting. TRULY scary. Real life horror.
But it turns out there was no need for me to do that at all: there *was* no mystery; the murder of the title is solved in the first 15 minutes, and then it's all just interviews and flashbacks to previous interviews that don't increase our understanding or add anything meaningful or new. There is no progression from one point to anywhere else, so it's actually all just very repetitive and boring.
On top of that, there just seems to be something *off* about the people involved: if someone had told me it was a mockumentary (or part mockumentary), I would have believed them, because everyone's talking seems stilted and... rehearsed? I don't know if that's because most of the people are Danish and so needed to clarify and self-translate their own thoughts into English before speaking, but it really reminded me of the 'Catfish' film from years ago, in which some parts had to have been recreated and acted out after the fact.
Something feels false, anyway, and we never get beneath the surface of anyone in the film, or ever feel that we've gotten to the heart of anything important and true, so the final judgement has to be that this is an interesting murder case turned into a very dull, amateurishly-made and largely pointless documentary.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesInitially announced as premiering on Netflix in May 2020. Following it's theatrical premiere at Sundance Film Festival however, two subjects and the film's main cinematographer, Cam Matheson protested the film in the press, accusing director Emma Sullivan and producers Mette Heide and Roslyn Walker of neglecting consent and traumatizing subjects. Netflix removed all reference to the film from its services on March 16th.
- Zitate
Self - Inventor: Self - Inventor: The thing is, it's been a side job of mine ever since I was a little boy to spoof out authorities, to make them believe that there is nothing wrong and then act.
Top-Auswahl
- How long is Into the Deep?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 30 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix