IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,8/10
24.593
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine arme Familie, ein ängstlicher Bauunternehmer und eine genervte Vermieterin werden in dieser dunklen Animationskomödie über verschiedene Epochen hinweg mit demselben mysteriösen Haus ver... Alles lesenEine arme Familie, ein ängstlicher Bauunternehmer und eine genervte Vermieterin werden in dieser dunklen Animationskomödie über verschiedene Epochen hinweg mit demselben mysteriösen Haus verbunden.Eine arme Familie, ein ängstlicher Bauunternehmer und eine genervte Vermieterin werden in dieser dunklen Animationskomödie über verschiedene Epochen hinweg mit demselben mysteriösen Haus verbunden.
- 1 Primetime Emmy gewonnen
- 2 Gewinne & 12 Nominierungen insgesamt
Mia Goth
- Mabel (segment "I")
- (Synchronisation)
Matthew Goode
- Raymond (segment "I")
- (Synchronisation)
Claudie Blakley
- Penelope (segment "I")
- (Synchronisation)
Eleanor De Swaef-Roels
- Isobel (segment "I")
- (Synchronisation)
Mark Heap
- Mr. Thomas (segment "I")
- (Synchronisation)
Joshua McGuire
- Georgie (segment "I")
- (Synchronisation)
Stephanie Cole
- Great Aunt Eleanor (segment "I")
- (Synchronisation)
Miranda Richardson
- Aunt Clarice (segment "I")
- (Synchronisation)
David Peacock
- Uncle Lucien
- (Synchronisation)
- …
Barnaby Pilling
- Van Schoonbeek (segment "I")
- (Synchronisation)
Jarvis Cocker
- Developer (segment "II")
- (Synchronisation)
Sven Wollter
- Odd Man (segment "II")
- (Synchronisation)
Yvonne Lombard
- Odd Woman (segment "II")
- (Synchronisation)
Tommy Hibbitts
- Police Officer #1 (segment "II")
- (Synchronisation)
- (as Bimini Bon Boulash)
Ayesha Antoine
- Police Officer #2
- (Synchronisation)
- …
Jason Barnett
- Visitors & Relatives (segment "II")
- (Synchronisation)
Wayne Forester
- Visitors & Relatives (segment "II")
- (Synchronisation)
Poppy Gathard
- Visitors & Relatives (segment "II")
- (Synchronisation)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This film contains 3 different and rather unique tales. First off I'd like to say - it's a very weird piece so it's not gonna be for everyone, and on Netflix it says 13+ but definitely don't watch it with children if you don't want to traumatise them. I'd say it's 16+ at the very least. It's not gory or violent by any means but it can be unsettling and very eerie at times, especially the first story. Now onto the review..
First: the creepy
This one is about how people tend to give themselves up for social expectations/money and the unmatiralistic purity of children. Its a rather sad tale but above everything it's an unsettling one. It's atmosphere is very eerie and to me it was visually, it looks like the distorted version of an old European cartoon, it sent chills down my spine the entire time, and though the story is kind of predictable, it managed to keep menon my toes. 8/10
Second: the fun
I couldn't quite grasp what this one was about, and to me this was the least entertaining out of the three. However it was quirky with a fun sense of humour so overall I did enjoy it. This one was interesting visually as well but it didn't stand out as much.
Side note/warning - if you have a fear of bugs you'll hate this one. 6/10
Third: the heartwarming
This story had a rather positive message about letting go of one's fear of change, taking a leap of faith instead of fixating on the past and the routines. It had a very nice/interesting atmosphere and it felt very humane to me. It was visually pleasing but nothing really unique. It's a nice closure to the previous stories, by the end it leavs the wiever with a good taste in yotheir mouth. 9/10.
First: the creepy
This one is about how people tend to give themselves up for social expectations/money and the unmatiralistic purity of children. Its a rather sad tale but above everything it's an unsettling one. It's atmosphere is very eerie and to me it was visually, it looks like the distorted version of an old European cartoon, it sent chills down my spine the entire time, and though the story is kind of predictable, it managed to keep menon my toes. 8/10
Second: the fun
I couldn't quite grasp what this one was about, and to me this was the least entertaining out of the three. However it was quirky with a fun sense of humour so overall I did enjoy it. This one was interesting visually as well but it didn't stand out as much.
Side note/warning - if you have a fear of bugs you'll hate this one. 6/10
Third: the heartwarming
This story had a rather positive message about letting go of one's fear of change, taking a leap of faith instead of fixating on the past and the routines. It had a very nice/interesting atmosphere and it felt very humane to me. It was visually pleasing but nothing really unique. It's a nice closure to the previous stories, by the end it leavs the wiever with a good taste in yotheir mouth. 9/10.
Though 'IMDb' lists 'The House (2022)' as a TV series*, 'Netflix' presents it as a feature-length affair and plenty of online sources (including 'Wikipedia' and several reputable film critics) refer to it as a movie. As such, I'm going to consider it a feature film, making it the first film I've seen that was initially released in 2022. It's also worth noting that, although its three stories exist more or less in isolation from one another, the thing feels like a cohesive experience that presents a few different interpretations of its central concept (so it's better suited to a movie than a mini-series, in my opinion). The first flick of the year is usually a bit subpar, but this is far from such. It's actually pretty great. The piece is an anthology of stop-motion animation that tells three distinct stories, each of which surround the eponymous house regardless of the fact that they're separated by many years and, even, the species of creature they focus on. The fact that the three stories star humans, rats and cats respectively can be interpreted in a few ways. Firstly, the changes in species could be entirely stylistic, meaning that the characters are represented by humans, rats and cats but are actually always one of the three (perhaps whichever you most connect with). Secondly, the timeline could be entirely linear and be set over a couple of thousand years rather than a couple of hundred, with giant rats at some point overthrowing humans before then themselves being overthrown by giant cats. The third possibility is that the house transcends conventional boundaries of space and time, occupying several different realities (across which these three stories take place). This aspect of the picture isn't particularly important and is certainly open to interpretation, like most of the narrative's surrealist events. It isn't so much a straightforward plot as it is a sort of unsettling mood poem. Even though the three stories are written by the same person, they feel wildly different in terms of tone and theme. Even their aesthetics are unique, the loose wool of the first segment contrasting sharply with the crisp fibres of the last. The segments compliment each other, though. In a way, they each start with the same concept and take it in their own direction, which makes for a consistently compelling watch. The first segment is, for me, the highlight, with a genuinely creepy atmosphere and a wonderfully moody aesthetic. There's something almost intangible about it and it often makes you smile because of how confidently bizarre it is. It feels like 19th century gothic horror, even if it's a lot more surreal than most entries in that genre, and it's certainly the most conventionally disquieting short in the film. The second segment has a surprisingly effective final moment, though, which is all the more startling because most of this story plays out like a pseudo 'kitchen sink' drama about an uncannily realistic renovator. As a result, it's actually rather scary as a whole. Its down-to-earth central performance and its nuanced animations make it feel remarkably true to life despite the fact that it features talking rodents. This is actually one of the things that makes it get under your skin, since it feels so strangely familiar and stressfully alien all at once. The moments of genuine comedy (largely absent from the first story) also add to this effect. The picture's third segment is very light on horror, more or less whittling its scares down to the gnawing realisation that the protagonist has been trapped by her own domesticity. It's a different sort of horror and it plays out more like a drama for most of its duration. Its hopeful ending is also tinged with a dash of sadness; perhaps it's too good to be true? Despite not being creepy, the final movement is still effective and engaging. Overall, this is a really solid animated horror film. Its aesthetic is gorgeous and its concepts are oddly engrossing. It isn't terrifying, but it is unsettling and it has the ability to provoke real retrospection. It's an entertaining affair from start to finish. 7/10.
*'IMDb' has subsequently altered the movie's page, which means that 'The House (2022)' is now correctly labelled as a film rather than a TV show.
*'IMDb' has subsequently altered the movie's page, which means that 'The House (2022)' is now correctly labelled as a film rather than a TV show.
This film is one of the most well-crafted films I have ever seen. Every single frame is so precise in the details. I really hope that other filmmakers are inspired by this type of creativity, and use this styling in their own films.
The stories themselves were weirdly unsettling, and although I wouldn't classify it as a horror, many elements seemed as though they were inspired from some nightmarish dream. Although I am sure many audiences will find that they prefer a certain "story" (or generation) above the others - as each story seems to be specifically catered to a certain demographic - each story is unique in its story telling and compelling enough to make you keep watching.
I highly recommend this film, it is a great watch and surely worth your time. It is much better than 95% of the current content on Netflix by far.
The stories themselves were weirdly unsettling, and although I wouldn't classify it as a horror, many elements seemed as though they were inspired from some nightmarish dream. Although I am sure many audiences will find that they prefer a certain "story" (or generation) above the others - as each story seems to be specifically catered to a certain demographic - each story is unique in its story telling and compelling enough to make you keep watching.
I highly recommend this film, it is a great watch and surely worth your time. It is much better than 95% of the current content on Netflix by far.
Lovely animation that perfectly suits the tone of the three stories. I was especially unsettled while watching the first story. Darkly funny, enjoyably uncomfortable, and I like that not every little question is answered (for example: who exactly is the builder of the house?). If you liked Love Death & Robots, give this a go.
The stop animation is definitely beautiful. There was a lot of attention to detail and love poured into it.
The story itself was interesting. The first chapter has that mystery olden horror into it, and I kinda thought it would play out more twisty then what we actually got.
Second chapter was both hilarious and sad, with kinda a fitting ending.
The third chapter was also well done. Helena Bonham Carter was a gem in it.
Overall the story and theme can be interpreted in anyway or taken straight as a whole story. Definitely didn't regret watching this movie. Hoping they make more with more twisty story.
The story itself was interesting. The first chapter has that mystery olden horror into it, and I kinda thought it would play out more twisty then what we actually got.
Second chapter was both hilarious and sad, with kinda a fitting ending.
The third chapter was also well done. Helena Bonham Carter was a gem in it.
Overall the story and theme can be interpreted in anyway or taken straight as a whole story. Definitely didn't regret watching this movie. Hoping they make more with more twisty story.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesIt was originally meant to be a mini-series, but it was eventually changed to an anthology film.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Steve Reviews: The House (2022)
- SoundtracksThis House Is...
Written by Jarvis Cocker and Gustavo Santaolalla
Performed by Jarvis Cocker
Published by Maisie Music Publishing LLC
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The House?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 37 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen