IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,2/10
1771
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Der Film spielt in einem dystopischen Amerika, in dem alle Menschen, die nicht heterosexuell, weiß, christlich und gleichgeschlechtlich sind, von der Regierung mit Strichcodes erfasst werden... Alles lesenDer Film spielt in einem dystopischen Amerika, in dem alle Menschen, die nicht heterosexuell, weiß, christlich und gleichgeschlechtlich sind, von der Regierung mit Strichcodes erfasst werden.Der Film spielt in einem dystopischen Amerika, in dem alle Menschen, die nicht heterosexuell, weiß, christlich und gleichgeschlechtlich sind, von der Regierung mit Strichcodes erfasst werden.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Jackson Francis Greene
- Volunteer SWAT Team
- (as John Greene)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I want to explain in this review why some white conservatives feel the way we do about the movie. For starters, in order to like this movie I think you have to already be on board with a sizable share of liberal dogma. If you aren't, then obviously seeing the narratives ratcheted up to 11 in the most implausible way isn't going to resonate with you. For conservative white people the premise of the movie comes across as a bit of an attack and I'll tell you why. If you're at all concerned about demographic replacement for example, or even just happen to notice the amount of anti-White rhetoric put out daily by the media, it's infuriating to see a movie that the left unironically believes to show a possible and not-so-distant future. The protagonists are of course stand-ins for their real world counterparts who without a shred of self-awareness claim they are opposing fascism while attacking people and forcing them to comply with their world view, often with help from the state. Talk about an inversion of reality. The fact that the majority White population is shrinking (often to sounds of applause), that it's trendy to hate White people, and that racism towards Whites is claimed to be impossible meanwhile the entire establishment openly embraces it are all things that greatly contribute to the hate this movie gets. If you're on the left you're probably shaking your head right now but I would wager that those of you who are likely haven't been exposed to much outside of your ideological bubble. I don't mean that in a spiteful way either. Consider this: most of the mainstream and establishment media leans left, most of the entertainment industry leans left, and most of the prominent figures in Big Tech lean left. Both the left and the right are exposed to these narratives by nature of their availability and constant promotion, but only one side is bombarded with things they disagree with. Liberals don't really get that opportunity unless they actively seek out opposing views, and why would they when those same information channels will gladly tell them what the other side is like? Would you trust an entirely right-wing dominated establishment to accurately and fairly portray your views? Probably not. So that's the political reason a lot of us don't like the movie.
There are many things to dislike about the writing and overall plot as well. It seemed like the main focus of the movie should have been on the barn and not the various personal dramas between the protagonists, because the entire premise was that the person they had imprisoned held bad views and should change. Not nearly enough time was spent exploring the belief system of Gabe and his "transformation" happened way too quickly to feel authentic. This is where it falls apart for the movie because I feel like the writers wanted to misrepresent the views of their political opposition in real life by constructing a character that only half-explains their beliefs, poorly, and then just gives up on them after a little prodding as if they were never really sincere. Of course we're not going to see Gabe's points fully fleshed out or given proper context due to time constraints or other reasons, however many of the things they made Gabe say are a combination of genuine concerns and convenient "icky" pretexts that seem aimed at disqualifying them from consideration. Here's a textbook example of the conflation I'm talking about: "Allowing you to exist is a threat to the white race". That line appears tailor made to discredit what Gabe said seconds before, which was "people like you, they're actively replacing my entire race. That's just a fact". It's meant to make people who point out that White countries are the only ones being encouraged to replace or reduce their majority populations seem hateful. It is highly insulting to be portrayed like that, as if "allowing non-whites to exist is a problem" is the argument actually being made.
On the social and cultural side most of us are simply fed up with having LGBT and diversity quotas being priority number one in the media and everything else. They felt compelled with this movie to tick all the boxes and did so in such a way that it felt *extremely* forced. We should be able to criticize the overreliance on "representation as a selling point" without being called names for it. That needs to stop. The movie could have been greatly improved if even one or two things were toned down and I promise you that most people, left and right alike, are tired of it all. Only the far-left and the far-right are obsessed with these things; everyone else just wants entertaining movies. While there are other things that contributed to the hate surrounding this movie, the issues I've illustrated are a good enough starting point for anyone acting in good faith to understand. We're not just piling on for fun because it was made by the left, we're telling you precisely what angers us and to paraphrase Douglas Murray, we're done trying to convince you to be civil. If you want to pretend we're saying something we're not then that is entirely on you.
There are many things to dislike about the writing and overall plot as well. It seemed like the main focus of the movie should have been on the barn and not the various personal dramas between the protagonists, because the entire premise was that the person they had imprisoned held bad views and should change. Not nearly enough time was spent exploring the belief system of Gabe and his "transformation" happened way too quickly to feel authentic. This is where it falls apart for the movie because I feel like the writers wanted to misrepresent the views of their political opposition in real life by constructing a character that only half-explains their beliefs, poorly, and then just gives up on them after a little prodding as if they were never really sincere. Of course we're not going to see Gabe's points fully fleshed out or given proper context due to time constraints or other reasons, however many of the things they made Gabe say are a combination of genuine concerns and convenient "icky" pretexts that seem aimed at disqualifying them from consideration. Here's a textbook example of the conflation I'm talking about: "Allowing you to exist is a threat to the white race". That line appears tailor made to discredit what Gabe said seconds before, which was "people like you, they're actively replacing my entire race. That's just a fact". It's meant to make people who point out that White countries are the only ones being encouraged to replace or reduce their majority populations seem hateful. It is highly insulting to be portrayed like that, as if "allowing non-whites to exist is a problem" is the argument actually being made.
On the social and cultural side most of us are simply fed up with having LGBT and diversity quotas being priority number one in the media and everything else. They felt compelled with this movie to tick all the boxes and did so in such a way that it felt *extremely* forced. We should be able to criticize the overreliance on "representation as a selling point" without being called names for it. That needs to stop. The movie could have been greatly improved if even one or two things were toned down and I promise you that most people, left and right alike, are tired of it all. Only the far-left and the far-right are obsessed with these things; everyone else just wants entertaining movies. While there are other things that contributed to the hate surrounding this movie, the issues I've illustrated are a good enough starting point for anyone acting in good faith to understand. We're not just piling on for fun because it was made by the left, we're telling you precisely what angers us and to paraphrase Douglas Murray, we're done trying to convince you to be civil. If you want to pretend we're saying something we're not then that is entirely on you.
The movie has a weird story does not make any sense. I don't know what the movie is trying to prove. It has a bad plot which is dragged for 1hr 30mins. Please save yourself time don't watch this movie.
Oh man. I don't know how to feel about this one and it's driving me nuts! I want to like it because as a standalone film it was good, but because it is so obviously a left-wing circle jerk of nonsense I can't bring myself to rate it positively. I even watched their YouTube watch party thing and sure enough they believe in all the usual wacky things that the modern left does. It's not subtle at all and the entire thing just oozes insincerity. If they really wanted to make it a message about finding common ground they should have first ventured outside their own echo chamber (yes, both sides have one!) and learned what the people they're depicting really think. The prisoner in this film just seemed like a caricature to bounce lefty talking points off of with none of the opposing arguments you'd find in reality. "But I'm a muslim!" Hahaha.
A good premise. Timely and terrifying. Too bad they couldn't follow thru with a plausible script. Why in the world would people who want a White, Straight, christian America prevent those who are not from leaving the country?? Major plot holes, lousy character development, tedious dialogue. I couldn't wait for it to end.
And there is no pun intended here. It is not so much a philosophical question, but rather: what do you want to from the movies you watch? Do you want them to be different? To make you guess where they are going instead of being able to guess every single beat? And yes there is predictable things in this too of course, but it is quite out there overall - again no pun intended.
Considering some of the decisions made recently by the Supreme Court in America, I wouldn't call this future right here that dystopian or too much in the future. Fortunately there are still more than enough people fighting the good fight. And by that I mean that metaphorically speaking, not actual fighting.
Actual fighting and action scenes can be seen here though. Because after all this is supposed to be a movie that even with the heart on the right place and a good message, has to entertain you (while schooling you - which admitedly is not the best plan). There are also some flaws in the acting department and some other things you have to suspend your disbelief with ... if you are able ... then maybe you'll find the idea is strong enough to carry the whole thing too.
Considering some of the decisions made recently by the Supreme Court in America, I wouldn't call this future right here that dystopian or too much in the future. Fortunately there are still more than enough people fighting the good fight. And by that I mean that metaphorically speaking, not actual fighting.
Actual fighting and action scenes can be seen here though. Because after all this is supposed to be a movie that even with the heart on the right place and a good message, has to entertain you (while schooling you - which admitedly is not the best plan). There are also some flaws in the acting department and some other things you have to suspend your disbelief with ... if you are able ... then maybe you'll find the idea is strong enough to carry the whole thing too.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesWilliam C. Sullivan and Jarrett Kerr previously collaborated on the feature film Jane Wants a Boyfriend
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is American Insurrection?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- American Insurrection
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 55 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.00 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen