Die jüngsten Absolventen eines abgelegenen US-Luftwaffenstützpunktes müssen eine genmanipulierte Biowaffe vor dem russischen Militär schützen, das den tödlichen Virus um jeden Preis in seine... Alles lesenDie jüngsten Absolventen eines abgelegenen US-Luftwaffenstützpunktes müssen eine genmanipulierte Biowaffe vor dem russischen Militär schützen, das den tödlichen Virus um jeden Preis in seinen Besitz bringen will.Die jüngsten Absolventen eines abgelegenen US-Luftwaffenstützpunktes müssen eine genmanipulierte Biowaffe vor dem russischen Militär schützen, das den tödlichen Virus um jeden Preis in seinen Besitz bringen will.
- Rapp
- (as Sarah Wilkinson)
- Hazmat Guy #2
- (as Philip Seeger)
- Assan Tech
- (Synchronisation)
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Not even gonna give this the light of day.
Zero effort.
Also, Eric Roberts seemed to follow in Nick Cage's footsteps by accepting virtually every script that winds up in his mailbox. No matter how bad it is. Seems neither two have a reputation anymore to uphold.
The producers were also snotty and bold enough to keep "Top Gun" in the release title, which is surprising. So if you love amateur acting, plot holes, anachronisms, goofs, errors, visual mistakes and clueless directing, then you came to the right picture. Everyone with a bit of cinematic taste should avoid this though as it will cause eye cancer, bleeding from both ears and uncontrollable vomiting.
Granted, I had a feeling that this was going to be another one of those lousy mockbusters from The Asylum. I assumed as much from the mere title of the movie and its cover. And true enough to my assumptions, as I saw The Asylum's logo on the intro screen, then of course it was as expected.
Still, I opted to give the movie a chance, despite of it having Eric Roberts on the cast list. Why? Well, because once in a blue moon, then The Asylum actually manages to produce something that is entertaining and worth the time and effort.
"Top Gunner" wasn't one such instance. Nay. "Top Gunner" was atrociously bad and pointless. It was a massive struggle to just sit through the ordeal. Did writer Geoff Meed manage to produce anything even remotely worthwhile watching? No. Did director Daniel Lusko manage to turn the lack of a proper storyline and script into a watchable movie? No.
The acting in the movie was actually not all that bad, just a shame that the actors and actresses had literally nothing to work with in terms of a proper script, storyline or characters.
If you enjoy flight movies and pilot dramas, then do yourself a favor and stay clear of this one. "Top Gunner" was by no means an interesting, entertaining, watchable, enjoyable or wholehearted movie. Sure, there are far worse movies out there, but the 2020 movie "Top Gunner" is up there.
My rating of "Top Gunner" lands on a two out of ten stars.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThis was a mockbuster of Top Gun: Maverick (2022), which was first intended to be released in 2019, and then rescheduled to June 2020, before being rescheduled to December 2020 due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and then again to 2021 before being delayed to 2022. Because of the numerous delays, the mockbuster saw home video release two years before the movie it was meant to cash in on had a scheduled release date.
- PatzerWhen the Russian fighter is shot down, Sparrow ejects from her Hornet despite the aircraft having no damage and being no longer in danger. She just wasted a $30 million aircraft for no reason.
- Zitate
Colonel Herring: I often wonder, what would have happened, had Lassen and his men, landed in another training base. But luckily, they landed in mine.
- VerbindungenSpoofs Top Gun (1986)
Top-Auswahl
- How long is Top Gunner?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 24 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1