Ghost Adventures: Quarantine

This show is big on buildup with Zack being the lead. He is very melodramatic. The yelling and "surprise" effects are really unnecessary. The film is very hazy most time and truly show nothing of importance. I've live in two houses with spirits, one I grew up in and one I purchased. There were sounds, smells a plenty but nothing as "terror filled" as this crew makes them out to be. Watch other shows in the genre especially the ones which help the spirits move on. This is like a low rent side show.

I've watched all the Ghost Adventures series, and used to really love it. I notice Zak having a slightly mean streak towards his other investigators, I also pick up a slight sense of desperation. I absolutely love Jay Wasley, he comes over as gentle and honest. One of the most scariest episodes to me was the 'St. Annes retreat' I was really riveted, and loved it. But sadly I think it's all a bit exaggerated now, I know there are lots of different competing programmes out there doing the same sort of thing. But keep it real guys like you used to and you will have my vote.

Not sure what the other reviews are about but if you enjoy Ghost adventures the series, you will enjoy this mini series. Its all done in the Haunted Museum (which i have been to, and can attest to its creepiness and unnatural occurrences) excluding a couple scenes and its done without a production crew, only the 4 GAC guys Jay Billy Aaron and Zak. Billy is annoying as usual. Sorry not sorry.

Some great interviews and evidence when compared to a regular episode. Its dramatic, creepy, and entertaining. I would suggest it if you are a fan of the show. And i recommend traveling to Vegas to see the artifacts for yourself, it makes these episodes that much more interesting.

Don't waste your time. Not at all interesting. Bunch of kooks.

So I could watch Rockstar Zack look intellectual until he get's "effected" and becomes all abusive to his crew and cast-mates?

No thanks. These guy's seriously damage the rep of "paranormal research" by passing off circumstantial evidence at best as "legit" evidence.

I unfortunately dont think this is going anywhere - it's bottom of the barrel cheap to produce and gets enough ratings for it just to be worth it. There's far better "research": on YouTube, where the "star" isnt absuve to his 'friends'