Eine Gruppe von Urbex-Enthusiasten reist in die Hinterwäldler der Appalachen, um Aufnahmen von verlassenen Häusern zu machen, als sie zum Gegenstand eines Videos werden - gemacht von einer a... Alles lesenEine Gruppe von Urbex-Enthusiasten reist in die Hinterwäldler der Appalachen, um Aufnahmen von verlassenen Häusern zu machen, als sie zum Gegenstand eines Videos werden - gemacht von einer anderen Art von "Enthusiasten".Eine Gruppe von Urbex-Enthusiasten reist in die Hinterwäldler der Appalachen, um Aufnahmen von verlassenen Häusern zu machen, als sie zum Gegenstand eines Videos werden - gemacht von einer anderen Art von "Enthusiasten".
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Kind of a good idea / premise but they blew it. Boring and not scary. What a bunch of jerks!
Usually I love this type of film, but this is a mess. Bad writing, bad direction, bad acting... There is nothing redeeming about this project at all. Please don't waste your time like I did. Imagine if Tommy Wiseau made a found footage but it had no comedic value like The Room did.
I'd rather watch your grandkid's home movies from the early 90s. I'd rather watch surveillance video from a parking lot of an abandoned mall. I would rather watch basketball.
Not even just boring, but actually annoying to watch.
I'd rather watch your grandkid's home movies from the early 90s. I'd rather watch surveillance video from a parking lot of an abandoned mall. I would rather watch basketball.
Not even just boring, but actually annoying to watch.
But it failed.
The covered bridge seen early in the movie I believe was at McConnell's Mill State Park in Butler County PA. I've walked the trails there and I've walked across that bridge. It's a beautiful area but also dangerous.
I thought the camera work was awful. The entire movie is blurred and slightly pixelated.
None of the actors stand out.
There were some good moments in this movie but they were too few and far between and hard to see.
Disappointing.
The covered bridge seen early in the movie I believe was at McConnell's Mill State Park in Butler County PA. I've walked the trails there and I've walked across that bridge. It's a beautiful area but also dangerous.
I thought the camera work was awful. The entire movie is blurred and slightly pixelated.
None of the actors stand out.
There were some good moments in this movie but they were too few and far between and hard to see.
Disappointing.
Barely got through this thing. Should be a cool concept: group of "urban explorers" who know each other through social media team up to explore some creepy woods to find out what happened to the protagonist's brother. The only reason this isn't a one is because parts of the opening sequence are cool. All downhill from there. Main guy CANNOT act and the supporting cast isn't better. Why is there a ghost psychic in this? Why don't these idiots just call the cops based on the opening video? I am from this area and there are legit creepy spots like this, but it could have been so much better.
Ok I've just watched this and honestly, I would have given it an average 5 stars.
It's not an awful film by any means, it's a low budget knock off of the Blair witch Project but with a serial killer instead of a witch.
Some of the locations are and camera work is pretty cool but it has all the same problems nearly all of the BW knock offs suffer from. Slow plodding pace, an hour of people talking, walking through woods and old houses, more talking, bickering and walking around and little to nothing happens until the last 15 minutes.
The death scenes in this are all off camera bar one and there's almost no gore to speak of. It's not scary, it's not unsettling, it's so tame and by the numbers. Sure I have seen a lot worse but that is not a glowing endorsement.
The reason I have given this 1 star is that I am sick of seeing these low budget movies being given glowing 10 star reviews the day they come out, from accounts set up that very day that have literally done nothing else. one review, one interaction and all on this film claiming it's the best most scary thing ever produced, usually over praising actors in the film or the director. It's so blatantly obvious they're fake and planted reviews from members of the production team to boost interest. It's insulting and a way of trying to cheat your film to success.
Until IMDB comes up with a system that only allows reviews from people with a reputation on here, you know, people who have been members for a while and regularly post here, rate and review films and are honest in thier opinions. This will just keep on happening, it's too open to abuse at the moment.
My honest opinion of this film, if you enjoy cheap found footage films where people spend an awfully long time walking through creepy looking forests and old abandoned houses, then you might enjoy this. But for me, there's not enough happened in it to justify its run time, the characters are stupid and say and do some of the most ridiculous things, thier interactions with things are absolutely bananas. They scream in shock when an old mattress is turned over with a big stain on it and yet when they find a dead body hidden under the stairs it's almost like "oh look at that, that's strange" and then they just move on.
There's a lot better found footage horrors out there but there's also a lot worse. But don't base whether or not you want to watch this solely on the reviews turning up on the net. Most of them are fake, most of them are written by people associated with the film and that alone should tell you all you need to know about what they, themselves think of thier own films quality.
Some of the locations are and camera work is pretty cool but it has all the same problems nearly all of the BW knock offs suffer from. Slow plodding pace, an hour of people talking, walking through woods and old houses, more talking, bickering and walking around and little to nothing happens until the last 15 minutes.
The death scenes in this are all off camera bar one and there's almost no gore to speak of. It's not scary, it's not unsettling, it's so tame and by the numbers. Sure I have seen a lot worse but that is not a glowing endorsement.
The reason I have given this 1 star is that I am sick of seeing these low budget movies being given glowing 10 star reviews the day they come out, from accounts set up that very day that have literally done nothing else. one review, one interaction and all on this film claiming it's the best most scary thing ever produced, usually over praising actors in the film or the director. It's so blatantly obvious they're fake and planted reviews from members of the production team to boost interest. It's insulting and a way of trying to cheat your film to success.
Until IMDB comes up with a system that only allows reviews from people with a reputation on here, you know, people who have been members for a while and regularly post here, rate and review films and are honest in thier opinions. This will just keep on happening, it's too open to abuse at the moment.
My honest opinion of this film, if you enjoy cheap found footage films where people spend an awfully long time walking through creepy looking forests and old abandoned houses, then you might enjoy this. But for me, there's not enough happened in it to justify its run time, the characters are stupid and say and do some of the most ridiculous things, thier interactions with things are absolutely bananas. They scream in shock when an old mattress is turned over with a big stain on it and yet when they find a dead body hidden under the stairs it's almost like "oh look at that, that's strange" and then they just move on.
There's a lot better found footage horrors out there but there's also a lot worse. But don't base whether or not you want to watch this solely on the reviews turning up on the net. Most of them are fake, most of them are written by people associated with the film and that alone should tell you all you need to know about what they, themselves think of thier own films quality.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesWriter/Director Nick Danko used local actors for this movie, wanting to keep the authentic feel of the film.
- PatzerAfter knocking out the backwoods man, Cross' knuckles are nor bruised or cut, but clearly have large red circles of equal size drawn on them.
- SoundtracksPaper Town
written by Josh Shapiro, Nicole Moultos
performed by Rocket Loves Blue
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Red Woods?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Красный лес
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 35 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen