IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,4/10
3556
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Es geht um den Waisenjungen Pip, der seine Kindheit als Schmiedelehrling verbracht hat und plötzlich von einem unbekannten Wohltäter einen Geldsegen erhält, der es ihm ermöglicht, nach Londo... Alles lesenEs geht um den Waisenjungen Pip, der seine Kindheit als Schmiedelehrling verbracht hat und plötzlich von einem unbekannten Wohltäter einen Geldsegen erhält, der es ihm ermöglicht, nach London zu reisen und in die High Society einzutreten.Es geht um den Waisenjungen Pip, der seine Kindheit als Schmiedelehrling verbracht hat und plötzlich von einem unbekannten Wohltäter einen Geldsegen erhält, der es ihm ermöglicht, nach London zu reisen und in die High Society einzutreten.
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Gewinne & 5 Nominierungen insgesamt
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Dickens was a wonderfully descriptive writer- but there's no richness of story in the first episode.
It is like watching a plodding unimaginative story recounted in a flat voice by someone who can't be bothered.
It isn't the cast's fault- indeed the casting is probably the best part of this version.
I found the relationship between Pip and Joe curiously cold.
I simply found I couldn't care about what happened next.
Perhaps some previous versions have just been too good.
My all time favourite was years ago-with a wonderful Stratford Johns playing Magwitch. I was hoping for something like that this time.
I don't think I'll watch the rest.
It has made me want to re-read the book again.
It is like watching a plodding unimaginative story recounted in a flat voice by someone who can't be bothered.
It isn't the cast's fault- indeed the casting is probably the best part of this version.
I found the relationship between Pip and Joe curiously cold.
I simply found I couldn't care about what happened next.
Perhaps some previous versions have just been too good.
My all time favourite was years ago-with a wonderful Stratford Johns playing Magwitch. I was hoping for something like that this time.
I don't think I'll watch the rest.
It has made me want to re-read the book again.
2jjjj
It's okay for a movie or show to depart from the book it's based on, but if it does then don't we want it to at least do something interesting with the differences? If this series chooses to show Pip as a moody romantic teenager rather than as a child, then couldn't he at least be given some personality? The screenwriters do keep some bits of Dickens' writing -- which stand out from the rest of the wooden dialog -- but otherwise there's no individuality in the characters: they all speak more or less the same way, even those (such as Joe and Pumblechook) from completely different backgrounds. The show is all atmosphere and scenery at the expense of acting and story.
It got worse and worse. It started out ok. There were a few instances of context that are not in Dickens, references to opium and the slave trade, and there was some clunky dialogue where women explained they were not ok with second class citizenship. That was ok. I felt it was unnecessary personally but I can see the temptation to make obvious to a modern audience what is implied or inferred.
By episode three it went off into scenes that are not in the book in any way and dialogue that has nothing to do with the novel. It is also slow paced. So much plodding music and a brooding boy. Makes you wonder why it was made.
By episode three it went off into scenes that are not in the book in any way and dialogue that has nothing to do with the novel. It is also slow paced. So much plodding music and a brooding boy. Makes you wonder why it was made.
Several of my favorite actors are in this adaptation, and I really wanted to love it. With every episode, I hated this version more and more. The entire thing strayed so far from the book and other adaptations. I get the creative license and interpreting it in a unique way, but my great expectations for this adaptation did not come to fruition. I think my disappointment was in the Pip storyline most of all. There were a few things I did like about this interpretation but it was from other characters mostly. I know Great Expectations is generally depressing, but this version was so extremely depressing and full of heartache and negative scenes (even gross scenes), that it really turned me off. I will not be watching this version again (I have previous versions on DVD).
I was anticipating this show with great expectations. I circled the day on my calendar. I was looking forward to the deep, colorful characters and masterful story telling and beauty of Charles Dickens. Instead, I found the outline of Dickens' story clothed in a gaudy and perverse costume. I was shocked by the steep incline into evil and darkness. I suggest that rather than having your soul assaulted, tuck a copy of the book Great Expectations under your arm and head for a quiet place to read. Even better, find a friend to go with you and take turns reading out loud. Enjoy the gift of Charles Dickens in all its glory.
Wusstest du schon
- Crazy CreditsThe main actors were listed in the closing credits with only their own names and not their corresponding character names.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How many seasons does Great Expectations have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Великі сподівання
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen