Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe story of A deaf caterer, who becomes embroiled in a thrilling investigation, after a detective asks her to lip-read the conversations of some dangerous criminals.The story of A deaf caterer, who becomes embroiled in a thrilling investigation, after a detective asks her to lip-read the conversations of some dangerous criminals.The story of A deaf caterer, who becomes embroiled in a thrilling investigation, after a detective asks her to lip-read the conversations of some dangerous criminals.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This is set in 1967 but we have a warehouse full of containers which weren't around then. We have read issuing a caution that didn't exist until PACE in 1984. These are just two of the inaccuracies. There are others such as the cut of the suits, the ties, the shoes. As soon as you see such inaccurate details you know the film is going to be a wrong 'un. The film gives far too much prominence to Read as the lead on the investigation. He was the head of a much bigger squad than the one portrayed and many of the details of the true investigation are absent whilst others have been invented. This film is trash and just cashes in on the fascination so many have with the Krays and of London in the sixties. To be honest, as a Londoner who grew up in the EastEnd in the Fifties and Sixties, this film feels more like the late 80's early 90's.
It wasn't until 1984 that the Police Caution was changed to include "...you may later rely on...". In addition the PACE rules were introduced long after the Krays. Detention of 24 Hours Max was not a restriction back in the day. I was half expecting one of the coppers to answer a Police Radio :-) C'mon writers, at least try and get the facts right. This kind of poor writing also happened a lot in "The Bill" where cautions, when made, happened long after the arresting (or merely interviewing) officer believed that a crime had been committed. It beggars belief that they did not in this film (or "The Bill") have any Police Fact Checking and it's a terrible indictment on the TV industry.
A reasonable watch if you are interested in the krays and there era. This film tells shows us events from nippers view which is different to the usual Kray films but works nicely.
Low budget but to be honest was not a deal breaker Worth a watch if you have a few hours free.
Low budget but to be honest was not a deal breaker Worth a watch if you have a few hours free.
Slow paced film about the investigation of the Krays. We have all seen other films about them but this differs because they aren't the main characters. Nipper Read and is team have to break through the wall of silence and fear that enabled the Krays to rule the underworld of the time with an iron fist. Assuming it's all true, it was a complex and clever plan, the face to face interviews were very good with a real air of menace. Well worth a watch if you like the history of the Krays. Well acted and the grim settings give you a sense of realism.
It was nice to get a new perspective on the reggie and rony story, this time from the pov of Nipper. I think stephen moyer played him well. Ronan summers plays the twins and I felt he looked and acted really good for the role. Overall it was decent take on the story and its nice to see it changed up a bit from a different persons view point.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesPROLOGUE: "London, 1965. Following a top secret operation ..... Detective Leonard 'Nipper' Read arrests the notorious gangsters ... Ronnie & Reggie Kray. But on the first day of the trial ... every witness recants. The twins walk free. Fear returns to the streets. Npper's career hangs in the balance."
- VerbindungenReferences Catch 22: Der böse Trick (1970)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Code of Silence?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 37 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen