All Eyes
- 2022
- 1 Std. 27 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,4/10
1534
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein in Ungnade gefallener Podcast-Moderator interviewt einen exzentrischen Bauern, der behauptet, in den Wäldern in der Nähe seines Hauses lebe ein Monster.Ein in Ungnade gefallener Podcast-Moderator interviewt einen exzentrischen Bauern, der behauptet, in den Wäldern in der Nähe seines Hauses lebe ein Monster.Ein in Ungnade gefallener Podcast-Moderator interviewt einen exzentrischen Bauern, der behauptet, in den Wäldern in der Nähe seines Hauses lebe ein Monster.
- Auszeichnungen
- 6 Gewinne & 17 Nominierungen insgesamt
Laurie Cummings
- Jean
- (Synchronisation)
Jeremy Parr
- Man on Walkie
- (Synchronisation)
Claire Kaplan
- Woman on Walkie
- (Synchronisation)
Andrew Rathgeber
- TV Announcer
- (Synchronisation)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I try to find movies that surprise me and this is one. Although it received a low rating (I suppose because it's a low-budget), All Eyes is a charming, fun and scary film. The acting is first rate and the story intriguing. Watch it and forget about the CGI bloated films that populate movie screens. Both central characters add pathos to the story and take the viewer in an unexpected direction. It would be worth-while to see what the team could do with a decent budget and another good story. Don reminds me of some of the cantankerous charactersI know and its played superbly. I recommend the film with a tub of popcorn for a late-night veiwing.
This is very different and much better than I had expected. The monster is sort of a McGuffin for the story of two damaged men.
The two principal characters are well-written and well-acted. The plot keeps the audience off-balance and unsure whether to laugh or recoil. I really couldn't predict where it was going, unlike most low-budget horror.
Criticisms: The writers didn't seem to know how to end the story, so it kind of limps along too long after the denouement. There is really only one secondary character, the podcast producer, and her acting is very weak. But the focus is on the two main characters, which are great.
The two principal characters are well-written and well-acted. The plot keeps the audience off-balance and unsure whether to laugh or recoil. I really couldn't predict where it was going, unlike most low-budget horror.
Criticisms: The writers didn't seem to know how to end the story, so it kind of limps along too long after the denouement. There is really only one secondary character, the podcast producer, and her acting is very weak. But the focus is on the two main characters, which are great.
Not a great film nor a stinker. Allen who had a podcast until a bad mistake got him off the air, follows people with strange ideas. A letter was written to him by a man whose late wife was a devoted fan, offering $25K to come out, as he knows there is a monster in the woods. The man, Don, is quite eccentric. And that really is the greater part of the movie. At one point, Don disappears, it seems there may be a monster, and Don has heavily boobytrapped everything, and those get triggered. And every time the red light goes on, traps are triggered, and some of them are quite clever. And they are deadly. There is some comic relief and also tension. And is there really a monster?
It's a small movie, for sure. But I really liked it. The nicest aspect is its originality. You haven't seen this story before, it's not a rehashing of two dozen movies you've seen before. It can be read as a metaphor of human pain and loss, but you are trapped by the narrative from start to finish. It's a nice small flick!
At the moment I'm writing this review, it is scored 5.4. It pretty much reflect what it does worth. I personally put a solid 6 on it. I found it entertaining and fun. Don't think you'll get great special effects, here, people flying all over the place, explosions, explicit gore, Godzilla-like creatures crushing cities, etc. Yet, it's well shot, the photography is nice with deep colors, it is well played through and through, and at the risk of revealing too much, you have a decent mix of heartfelt moments and action. A very decent film.
For reference, I score 6 for entertaining; 5 for entertaining with reservations; 7 for VERY entertaining movies.
At the moment I'm writing this review, it is scored 5.4. It pretty much reflect what it does worth. I personally put a solid 6 on it. I found it entertaining and fun. Don't think you'll get great special effects, here, people flying all over the place, explosions, explicit gore, Godzilla-like creatures crushing cities, etc. Yet, it's well shot, the photography is nice with deep colors, it is well played through and through, and at the risk of revealing too much, you have a decent mix of heartfelt moments and action. A very decent film.
For reference, I score 6 for entertaining; 5 for entertaining with reservations; 7 for VERY entertaining movies.
I've been posting reviews for over 5 and a half years here and most have been written with the purpose to warn people away from bad movies with ballot-box-stuffed ratings or just simply bad, usually with detailed reasons and spoilers.
But this movie is different - take your time with it, it relies on a pretty good plot, good acting for the few main characters and clever writing. One of the characters is a real piece of work and quirky - I loved that actor! The setup is slow but important and gives you time to soak in the background story before the pacing heats up so pay attention to the details in the setup as it pays off later. I just really enjoyed it, only 87 minutes long, and it was good entertainment. I refuse to spoil it by being more specific so I really recommend this.
P.s. When the credits roll it appears the film was a family affair, I counted at least 5 different Greenlees involved with it. They did a great job!
But this movie is different - take your time with it, it relies on a pretty good plot, good acting for the few main characters and clever writing. One of the characters is a real piece of work and quirky - I loved that actor! The setup is slow but important and gives you time to soak in the background story before the pacing heats up so pay attention to the details in the setup as it pays off later. I just really enjoyed it, only 87 minutes long, and it was good entertainment. I refuse to spoil it by being more specific so I really recommend this.
P.s. When the credits roll it appears the film was a family affair, I counted at least 5 different Greenlees involved with it. They did a great job!
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe entire farm location (including Don's house and workshop) was completely destroyed by a tornado in February 2023.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is All Eyes?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 27 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen