Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAn innocent man becomes the killer everyone wants him to be when he gambles his freedom in order to save it.An innocent man becomes the killer everyone wants him to be when he gambles his freedom in order to save it.An innocent man becomes the killer everyone wants him to be when he gambles his freedom in order to save it.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Empfohlene Bewertungen
When down-on-his-luck Sam Bailey takes a wrong turn on a remote country road, he ends up with more than a little dirt to wash off his shoes after a miserable farm wife's hope for a better life becomes his worst nightmare.
After Sam's greedy Russian wife discovers his deadly secret, she ups the ante with her own crazy plot - playing with Sam's life to cover her bet. The story of a man's absurd gamble to save his innocence; three desperate people who bet everything they have in a brainless high-stakes game of loser-loses-all.
Firstly, I completely agree with the reviewer who said the score for this movie has been manipulated. There is no way a normal person would give this a score of 8, 9 or 10! No way.
It's quite a pretentious movie and not a lot of it makes a shred of sense. For example if you walk into a hone and see broken furniture and blood on the carpet would you go in the basement? Really? The movie starts out well but then goes down hill fast. Believably disappears and there is no tension whatsoever. In fact there are scenes that are down right laughable.
And the main character smokes so much he MUST have lung cancer by now. Why he was cast at all is a mystery. He's got a horrible annoying voice. His claim to fame? He played a cop on the Trailer Park Boys.
After Sam's greedy Russian wife discovers his deadly secret, she ups the ante with her own crazy plot - playing with Sam's life to cover her bet. The story of a man's absurd gamble to save his innocence; three desperate people who bet everything they have in a brainless high-stakes game of loser-loses-all.
Firstly, I completely agree with the reviewer who said the score for this movie has been manipulated. There is no way a normal person would give this a score of 8, 9 or 10! No way.
It's quite a pretentious movie and not a lot of it makes a shred of sense. For example if you walk into a hone and see broken furniture and blood on the carpet would you go in the basement? Really? The movie starts out well but then goes down hill fast. Believably disappears and there is no tension whatsoever. In fact there are scenes that are down right laughable.
And the main character smokes so much he MUST have lung cancer by now. Why he was cast at all is a mystery. He's got a horrible annoying voice. His claim to fame? He played a cop on the Trailer Park Boys.
Story:A+ | Acting:C- | Cinematography:A+ | Editing:B- | Music:A
I saw it on the big screen in Houston a couple of years back. The plot is great - lots of twists and turns. Someone should definitely make a remake with more budget and better-known actors. I read this was shot with less than $ 100K in 28 days.
If you liked The Trouble with Harry (Hitchcock) or Fargo (Cohen), you'll probably enjoy this. It's basically a tongue-in-cheek dark comedy. It's not always clear how seriously we're expected to take the characters since they're basically all offbeat neurotics. Some of it's a little sketchy, some of it is excellent - so in the end it felt both refreshing and imperfect, like good indie films often do.
I saw it on the big screen in Houston a couple of years back. The plot is great - lots of twists and turns. Someone should definitely make a remake with more budget and better-known actors. I read this was shot with less than $ 100K in 28 days.
If you liked The Trouble with Harry (Hitchcock) or Fargo (Cohen), you'll probably enjoy this. It's basically a tongue-in-cheek dark comedy. It's not always clear how seriously we're expected to take the characters since they're basically all offbeat neurotics. Some of it's a little sketchy, some of it is excellent - so in the end it felt both refreshing and imperfect, like good indie films often do.
First and foremost, if you like the basic plot line of the movie give it a shot. I personally do not give any credit to reviews of any movie as everyone has different tastes in what they like. Secondly, pay no attention to the conspiracy theorists who claim the movies rating were inflated (so to speak). The plot line to this movie is believable and played out fairly well. The movie has some points that could have been better, but that is true of most any movie you watch. Keep in mind this was an indie film going in and with that being said, tailor what you expect to that. Overall, the movie was decently portrayed, the cast was fairly well suited to the characters, and the plot itself was not so outlandish as to be completely unbelievable (which sadly happens with big budget mainstream movies these days). Give the movie a chance and base your opinion solely on what you think of it and not what others have said. It has been my experience that if a critic (or armchair critic in this case) didn't like a movie, it was probably pretty good.
I thought this film was great. I loved the story line and the choice of folk music used. I actually researched the music after watching the movie several times. I take a chance and watch indie movies I've never heard of from time to time and wondered if this would be a good movie. A few minutes into the movie, I was hooked. I would recommend it to anyone. It's just a little over an hour long so if you don't like it, you haven't wasted too much time but I loved it!
My only problem was that this movie has not been watched enough to be able to do a Google search and find it based on the movie plot. I think it's a shame that they didn't spend more on publicity so more people would know about it. Anyway, I liked the movie very much and spent a lot of time trying to find the title so I could watch it again before I accidentally ran across it on Netflix again. I won't forget it next time! I would probably buy this movie if I could find it. Of course, I do like odd and off the beaten path types of movies. I thought it was original which is difficult to find these days and I never really figured out what was going to happen at the end until it was over.
Thanks for a great indie film!!
My only problem was that this movie has not been watched enough to be able to do a Google search and find it based on the movie plot. I think it's a shame that they didn't spend more on publicity so more people would know about it. Anyway, I liked the movie very much and spent a lot of time trying to find the title so I could watch it again before I accidentally ran across it on Netflix again. I won't forget it next time! I would probably buy this movie if I could find it. Of course, I do like odd and off the beaten path types of movies. I thought it was original which is difficult to find these days and I never really figured out what was going to happen at the end until it was over.
Thanks for a great indie film!!
The reason I wrote this review is to give a heads up to people like me who check this website for a film and it's ratings/reviews to get an idea of whether or not it is any good. The plot of 'Ante' is very original and interesting. The writer delivered a very cool idea. The movie itself, however, is awful. You get a nice opening 20 minutes or so but the rest of the movie is absolutely terrible. It slowly becomes more and more ridiculous to the point you can no longer take it seriously. The closing scene caps off the absurdity. Cringe-worthy. Don't be fooled by the score. Ante is not worth viewing.
Wusstest du schon
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 350.000 CA$ (geschätzt)
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Dead Man's Luck (2006) officially released in Canada in English?
Antwort