Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

The Prometheus Project

  • 2010
  • 18
  • 1 Std. 27 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,8/10
1093
IHRE BEWERTUNG
The Prometheus Project (2010)
HorrorScience-Fiction

Wissenschaftlerin Barnes ist neu im Team des geheimnisvollen Dr. Walton. Die Wissenschaftler forschen an einem universell einsetzbaren Wundheilungsserum, welches aus Stammzellen hergestellt ... Alles lesenWissenschaftlerin Barnes ist neu im Team des geheimnisvollen Dr. Walton. Die Wissenschaftler forschen an einem universell einsetzbaren Wundheilungsserum, welches aus Stammzellen hergestellt wird. Dafür experimentieren sie an Menschen.Wissenschaftlerin Barnes ist neu im Team des geheimnisvollen Dr. Walton. Die Wissenschaftler forschen an einem universell einsetzbaren Wundheilungsserum, welches aus Stammzellen hergestellt wird. Dafür experimentieren sie an Menschen.

  • Regie
    • Sean Tretta
  • Drehbuch
    • Sean Tretta
    • Mary Shelley
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Tiffany Shepis
    • Louis Mandylor
    • Scott Anthony Leet
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    4,8/10
    1093
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Sean Tretta
    • Drehbuch
      • Sean Tretta
      • Mary Shelley
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Tiffany Shepis
      • Louis Mandylor
      • Scott Anthony Leet
    • 11Benutzerrezensionen
    • 21Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 2 wins total

    Fotos24

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 18
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung34

    Ändern
    Tiffany Shepis
    Tiffany Shepis
    • Elizabeth
    Louis Mandylor
    Louis Mandylor
    • Marcus
    Scott Anthony Leet
    Scott Anthony Leet
    • David Doyle
    Patti Tindall
    • Victoria
    Jonathan Northover
    • William
    Sebastian Kunnappilly
    • Neeraj
    Noah Todd
    • Ira
    Joe Ricci
    Joe Ricci
    • Cyrus
    Zena Otsuka
    • Kima
    David C. Hayes
    David C. Hayes
    • Paul Fitcher
    Kristina Wayborn
    Kristina Wayborn
    • Elizabeth's Mother
    Ed Lauter
    Ed Lauter
    • Dr. Walton
    Shane Dean
    • Special Agent Wollstoncraft
    Esther Ellsworth
    • Special Agent Godwin
    Lillie Richardson
    • Ott
    Kevin Tye
    • Ivan
    R.K. Anderson
    R.K. Anderson
    • Marquez
    • (as Richard Anderson)
    Maya Stojan
    Maya Stojan
    • Dr. Walton's Nurse
    • Regie
      • Sean Tretta
    • Drehbuch
      • Sean Tretta
      • Mary Shelley
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen11

    4,81K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    4jacobjohntaylor1

    A classic horror story ruined.

    This a Frankenstein remake. Frankenstein is on of the greatest horror stories ever and they ruined it. This movie is badly acted. Badly written. It has an awful ending. In this one the monster can turn water into fruit punch. I don't mind that Dr Frankenstein is woman. The part about the monster turning water into fruit punch I could of do mind. This movie is not scary at all. I can think of some very scary Frankenstein movie. Frankenstein (1931) is very scary. The cures of Frankenstein is very scary. Frankenstein unbound is also very scary. I Frankenstein is also very scary. But not this one don't see it. Don't wast your money. And don't wast you time.
    5trashgang

    the project failed

    By doing illegal stem cell research a group finally discover the cell to recreate life. By experiment they failed many times but when one of the men, David, is being shot after he accuses the researchers of illegal processes he's been taken to give him the cell to give him life again.

    Oh yes, this is pure Frankenstein or Re-Animator stuff but sadly with a few common names in it it just didn't work out. With the mediocre acting by all thespians you just don't care about any one. And the fact that their is a lot of talking doesn't make it easier.

    David slowly learn things and becomes more and more aggressive. The only thing you want to know is the fact why Elisabeth is wearing a mask when she's been interrogate by the cops.

    It never really becomes gory, sure, some are shot in the head but it's a bit low on the horror site. The only thing that this movie does is make you think about cell research to create the perfect human. The problem is that most of the killing is done off-screen. You see the blood spurt and hear a head being crushed by David's hands. I guess you know what I mean. It's only the last 15 minutes that are really worth watching but by then it is too late, the Prometheus project failed.

    Gore 1/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 2/5 Story 2,5/5 Comedy 0/5
    6kannibalcorpsegrinder

    Predictable, bland telling of the story

    After joining an illegal group of doctors to find a way to improve stem cell research, a woman finds the latest experiments bring the dead back to life and the one test subject chosen gets stronger and more violent over time, threatening the quality of their work.

    This was an extremely disappointing effort, mostly due to the fact that the film's decided route makes for an incredibly unsatisfactory effort. Making the investigation of the team into their research and how they deal with each other isn't interesting or enjoyable, making for the first half of the film to have hardly anything worthwhile. Once it switches over into the regeneration angle, it's still quite a bit of time before the creature goes berserk as they spend a great deal of time treating and studying the subject, and it's really only the last ten minutes or so where it turns into a bloodbath when he goes crazy in the facility. That there's more damage done by a member of the team than the titular creature is another problematic point, and most of the scientific mumbo-jumbo is pretty headache-inducing if not inclined to follow along, but as mentioned, the last ten minutes are pretty good with the creature going through the facility killing them off one-by-one, but it's really too late to be of much use and leaving this one woefully underwhelming.

    Rated R: Graphic Violence and Graphic Language.
    7krachtm

    Nothing new, but entertaining, nonetheless.

    This movie is a bit scientifically ignorant, which might offend some people who are hoping for a science fiction story, and the philosophical / ethical questions are rather simplistic, but it's still enjoyable for what it is (a mad scientist movie, in the Frankenstein tradition). Basically, a group of ethically challenged researchers decide that they're going to muck around with illegal stem cell research. When things go wrong and bodies start to pile up, a unique opportunity presents itself, Herbert West-style: re-animating the cadavers of troublemakers who got in the way. Unfortunately, I thought the movie started to lose credibility here, as it started to take on more and more fantastical elements. I guess that if you're willing to buy into re-animating the dead, it shouldn't be such a leap to accept the whole supernatural twist that this movie takes near the middle (and, especially, the end), but what really annoyed me was that they trotted out that dumb "we only use 10% of our brain" myth. Ugh. I hate that. Much of the later film seems to hinge of this, and, once again, the man who can use all 100% of his brain turns out to be capable of psychic powers. This is complete nonsense, of course, but is it any more nonsensical than re-animating the dead, using stem cells? Eventually, I just gave up on this movie saying anything intelligent and treated it as a silly supernatural film, no more scientific than a haunted house or demonic possession story. After that point, I think I liked it better, because there really isn't anything deep here at all. If you're actually looking for an examination on medical ethics, a science fiction thriller, or extreme gore (there's a bit of gore, but it's not that bad), I'd suggest you skip The Frankenstein Syndrome. TFS is actually a pretty enjoyable movie, once you get past the technobabble and laughable "science", but it's certainly nothing that's going to make you ponder deep thoughts or strike up conversations with your friends.

    The acting and special effects were quite good, though the writing and directing were a bit uneven, unfortunately. Some of the things that the director had the actors yelling at each other were a bit unintentionally funny, but the actors did make it work. So, I figure that's good for a 7/10. I'd be curious to see what the director does next, but I'm not quite a fan yet.
    3JoeB131

    Pretentious Student Film

    That's the only explanation I can come up with on this one.

    Also, never trust a movie that is released under multiple titles. This is never a good sign.

    So a group of scientists is using stem cell research to reanimate the dead, because someone writing this was a liberal arts major. They are all "Cleverly" named after characters in Mary Shelly's novel.

    Hilarity ensues when the person they reanimate becomes a monster.

    And that's about it. This story has been done better so many times. The slow pace and gloomy sets (probably some campus's office building after hours) just drag the experience out.

    Mehr wie diese

    The Manson Family
    5,5
    The Manson Family
    All the Creatures Were Stirring
    4,9
    All the Creatures Were Stirring
    Night Wolf
    4,3
    Night Wolf
    Visher
    4,3
    Visher
    Devil's Doorway
    5,3
    Devil's Doorway
    Making Monsters
    5,5
    Making Monsters
    Depraved
    5,5
    Depraved
    Prometey
    5,5
    Prometey
    15 Cameras - Schau nicht weg!
    5,4
    15 Cameras - Schau nicht weg!
    A Beginner's Guide to Snuff
    5,0
    A Beginner's Guide to Snuff
    Drive Back
    4,5
    Drive Back
    Monster Hospital
    3,7
    Monster Hospital

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      The character names "Agent Wollstonecraft" and "Agent Godwin" are direct references to the original author of the novel "Frankenstein" - Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin Shelley.

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ16

    • How long is The Prometheus Project?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • Oktober 2010 (Vereinigte Staaten)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Frankenstein - Experiment in Terror
    • Drehorte
      • Phoenix, Arizona, USA
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • NWR Productions
      • Ominous Productions
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      • 1 Std. 27 Min.(87 min)
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Dolby Digital
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.85 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.