IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,3/10
6573
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine junge Frau entfesselt furchterregende Dämonen, als die übernatürlichen Kräfte, die einer jahrzehntealten Kluft zwischen Mutter und Tochter zugrunde liegen, unbarmherzig ans Licht kommen... Alles lesenEine junge Frau entfesselt furchterregende Dämonen, als die übernatürlichen Kräfte, die einer jahrzehntealten Kluft zwischen Mutter und Tochter zugrunde liegen, unbarmherzig ans Licht kommen.Eine junge Frau entfesselt furchterregende Dämonen, als die übernatürlichen Kräfte, die einer jahrzehntealten Kluft zwischen Mutter und Tochter zugrunde liegen, unbarmherzig ans Licht kommen.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Michael J Rogers
- Michael
- (as Michael J. Rogers)
Christopher Wardrop
- Detective
- (as Chris Froese)
Andrea Agur
- Cashier
- (Nicht genannt)
Nelson Conway
- Venatores soldier
- (Nicht genannt)
Emma Jonnz
- Dominique
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
WTF did I just watch? This isnt the Neil I remember. It felt like watching a low quality horror sci fi flick. Every Neil short movie and movie shows all the violence and chaos but this just skips over everything. The acting was good but this just isnt it. Very disappointing.
A decade ago I loved South African director Neill Blomkamp for his wonderful sci-fi movie DISTRICT 9, and I thought ELYSIUM was pretty good too (although CHAPPIE not so much). The last I heard of him was of his thwarted idea for an ALIENS sequel with not only Ripley but Hicks and Newt returning alive and well too; I thought that sounded like a great idea, but alas, it wasn't meant to be. So out of nowhere comes DEMONIC (2021), Blomkamp's newest movie as director, but watching this very ordinary possession movie you wouldn't notice his presence.
The first thing apparent is that this was shot on a very low budget during the pandemic, so expect closed sets and a small cast. The second thing is that it simply isn't very good. Possession flicks are ten-a-penny these days and all kind of roll into one, and this one goes through the same motions with contorting bodies and histrionics. I found it very tiresome, and to try to make it different they add in a load of CGI effect "dreamscape" stuff, but that bored me too. Let's hope Blomkamp bounces back from this misfire and gets some of the old magic back.
The first thing apparent is that this was shot on a very low budget during the pandemic, so expect closed sets and a small cast. The second thing is that it simply isn't very good. Possession flicks are ten-a-penny these days and all kind of roll into one, and this one goes through the same motions with contorting bodies and histrionics. I found it very tiresome, and to try to make it different they add in a load of CGI effect "dreamscape" stuff, but that bored me too. Let's hope Blomkamp bounces back from this misfire and gets some of the old magic back.
Please excuse my attempts at humor. It's a defensive reaction.
I really, really wanted to like this film. It has been on my watchlist for like 3 years, and I was constantly checking on it. I hoped for Wan as a director, but when I saw Blomkamp, I was pleasantly surprised. I wouldn't say I liked Elysium, but I think Neill is a talented director.
With that being said, I give this film a lot of credit and a 6/10. It had its moments, but the negatives overcame the positives. As more people will watch it, I think it will drop down to ~5.5 or less.
There were three major problems for me:
1) the dialogue was unbearable most of the time;
2) the amounts of exposition thrown in these were overwhelming. The story comes to a halt for 10-15 minutes, and then BOOM, you get bombarded with information the characters share (the things they already know btw). And it's not that confusing to provide this much flashback.
3) the whole technology/occult combination was fresh, but when they tell you the point of all that, it just becomes a laughable excuse and an insane over-complication of what could have been done.
Throw in some heavy continuity, and the majority of the viewers will probably dislike this. The ending clearly shows that at least 10-15 minutes of it was missing, the main lead teleports way too much, and some scenes end abruptly.
I want to mention some positives as well, the film did look good, and I enjoyed the ending night scenes. I constantly felt like I'm giving this film much more creditworthiness than it's worth, but I saw some potential in it.
And yeah, while interesting in their looks, the simulation scenes lacked creativity, and the entity of which we got no information looks like Radament from Diablo 2.
Overall, this is not a horror film. And as much as I appreciate the effort, I didn't like it as much as I wanted to.
I really, really wanted to like this film. It has been on my watchlist for like 3 years, and I was constantly checking on it. I hoped for Wan as a director, but when I saw Blomkamp, I was pleasantly surprised. I wouldn't say I liked Elysium, but I think Neill is a talented director.
With that being said, I give this film a lot of credit and a 6/10. It had its moments, but the negatives overcame the positives. As more people will watch it, I think it will drop down to ~5.5 or less.
There were three major problems for me:
1) the dialogue was unbearable most of the time;
2) the amounts of exposition thrown in these were overwhelming. The story comes to a halt for 10-15 minutes, and then BOOM, you get bombarded with information the characters share (the things they already know btw). And it's not that confusing to provide this much flashback.
3) the whole technology/occult combination was fresh, but when they tell you the point of all that, it just becomes a laughable excuse and an insane over-complication of what could have been done.
Throw in some heavy continuity, and the majority of the viewers will probably dislike this. The ending clearly shows that at least 10-15 minutes of it was missing, the main lead teleports way too much, and some scenes end abruptly.
I want to mention some positives as well, the film did look good, and I enjoyed the ending night scenes. I constantly felt like I'm giving this film much more creditworthiness than it's worth, but I saw some potential in it.
And yeah, while interesting in their looks, the simulation scenes lacked creativity, and the entity of which we got no information looks like Radament from Diablo 2.
Overall, this is not a horror film. And as much as I appreciate the effort, I didn't like it as much as I wanted to.
I'll make this short. Horror is my life; whether it's movies, shows, games or books. Horror is my niche. A 4 is generous which sucks Bc I loved District 9, Elysium and Chappie. Where to start. The main protagonist was utterly trash and annoying. The cinematography was actually cool with the whole VR portrayal. The action was limited. One minor scare. The biggest thing which could have brought it to a 7 for me was the fact that he didn't include what could have constituted a wicked action scene with a Vatican Spec Op Unit; either a lack of budget or time, but regardless it will hurt reviews given time. A Redbox rental at best.
Nah...couldn't have been...this was low budge messiness...rushed ideas, no vision and some silly dialogue....or better yet what I like to call "nothing talk"...it's almost as if he was contracted to make a movie to pay back the studio ??
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesFilmed secretly in Canada over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.
- PatzerWhen Carly is shown back home after the first interlink with her Mother she is in the kitchen with her back to the kitchen bench. You then hear the kettle whistling to tell you it's at its boil. Only when Carly turns round you see that the kettle is electric. To have a whistling kettle it would have to be on a gas stove. Edit: There are electric kettles that do whistle. You've just never seen one until now. Furthermore; It does not matter if a kettle is on a gas or electric stove. The water boiling is what produces the whistle. Not what causes the water to boil.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Half in the Bag: Demonic (2021)
- SoundtracksPiano Sonata No. 14 in C sharp minor, Op. 27 No. 2 'Moonlight' I. Adagio sostenuto
Composed by Ludwig van Beethoven
Published by Flipper srl APM (ASCAP)
Appears courtesy of APM Production Music
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Demonic?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 71.334 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 40.683 $
- 22. Aug. 2021
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 366.656 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 44 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.00 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen