Als seine Verlobte Lucy einer mysteriösen Krankheit zum Opfer fällt, wendet sich Arthur Holmwood an einen ehemaligen Rivalen in ihrer Zuneigung - Dr. John Seward - um Hilfe.Als seine Verlobte Lucy einer mysteriösen Krankheit zum Opfer fällt, wendet sich Arthur Holmwood an einen ehemaligen Rivalen in ihrer Zuneigung - Dr. John Seward - um Hilfe.Als seine Verlobte Lucy einer mysteriösen Krankheit zum Opfer fällt, wendet sich Arthur Holmwood an einen ehemaligen Rivalen in ihrer Zuneigung - Dr. John Seward - um Hilfe.
- Regisseur/-in
- Autoren
- Stars
3,1780
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Appalling acting !!
Know how the actors prepared for their parts in this film? They got a chair and each went alone into the most deepest ,darkest forest they could find and sat there staring at the trees for 9 hours none stop !!!
*yaawwwwwnnn* What? Oh, the movie is still going?!
Apologies for being harsh but there's one sin of sins in my book when it comes to movies, and that's being dull.
I watched grass grow for half an hour once, and compared with this movie, it was an absolutely riveting, tension-filled thrill ride.
The actors all feel as though they're waiting for their cues and then, when given them by some poor desperate movie equivalent of a stage prompter, they seem reluctant to deliver any lines in a way that would catch the audience's attention. It's the verbal equivalent of camouflage - it just disappears into the background noise.
Don't get me wrong - if I had to deliver that supremely wooden dialogue, I would be reluctant too. But please, won't someone think of the audience! Just a little zest would have gone a long way.
It also claims to be from Van Helsing's POV which is a weeeee bit inaccurate, since Van Helsing plays a fairly limited role and disappears frequently, without any narration of the story from his supposed POV.
In fact, most of the first half of the movie is Lucy lying around moaning like she's having the time of her life with her best buddy Buzz under the sheets. Albeit somewhat unenthusiastically.
I have to admit, I nodded off at one point somewhere after the 50 minute mark - probably my brain trying to protect itself from a boredom-induced coma. But then I woke for the last 10 minutes, which included the most abrupt and boring ending... which was not really a surprise, come to think of it.
Rating - 2/10: would not recommend even as a sedative, since the potential for lasting boredom-induced brain damage is far too high.
I watched grass grow for half an hour once, and compared with this movie, it was an absolutely riveting, tension-filled thrill ride.
The actors all feel as though they're waiting for their cues and then, when given them by some poor desperate movie equivalent of a stage prompter, they seem reluctant to deliver any lines in a way that would catch the audience's attention. It's the verbal equivalent of camouflage - it just disappears into the background noise.
Don't get me wrong - if I had to deliver that supremely wooden dialogue, I would be reluctant too. But please, won't someone think of the audience! Just a little zest would have gone a long way.
It also claims to be from Van Helsing's POV which is a weeeee bit inaccurate, since Van Helsing plays a fairly limited role and disappears frequently, without any narration of the story from his supposed POV.
In fact, most of the first half of the movie is Lucy lying around moaning like she's having the time of her life with her best buddy Buzz under the sheets. Albeit somewhat unenthusiastically.
I have to admit, I nodded off at one point somewhere after the 50 minute mark - probably my brain trying to protect itself from a boredom-induced coma. But then I woke for the last 10 minutes, which included the most abrupt and boring ending... which was not really a surprise, come to think of it.
Rating - 2/10: would not recommend even as a sedative, since the potential for lasting boredom-induced brain damage is far too high.
Poor Bram Stoker....
The guy must be turning in his grave.
This story has been told so many times, I do not see the point of yet another version. Why waste time and money with with amateur actors, poor production and minimal budget to make an amateurish version of Dracula?
There must other stories to be told... But, it seems, people have definitely run out of ideas. Because, all they can do is to do the same thing again and again again....
What next? A film combining zombies, vampires and werewolves and mummies?
This story has been told so many times, I do not see the point of yet another version. Why waste time and money with with amateur actors, poor production and minimal budget to make an amateurish version of Dracula?
There must other stories to be told... But, it seems, people have definitely run out of ideas. Because, all they can do is to do the same thing again and again again....
What next? A film combining zombies, vampires and werewolves and mummies?
Hilarious reviews
I've read the first four reviews about this movie and they're absolutely hilarious. I appreciate the warnings prior my attempts in watching this train wreck of a movie. Thanks in advance guys.
Unneccessary and bad remake
There isn't much to be said about this movie. It is the worst version of the story and I cannot figure out why it needed to be done. It adds absolutely nothing new to the story.
If it wouldn't be a remake of an iconic story I'd be more forgiving, but this just feels like an insult. The acting is quite bad and the only piece of action in the end was done so amateurishly it was just laughable.
If it wouldn't be a remake of an iconic story I'd be more forgiving, but this just feels like an insult. The acting is quite bad and the only piece of action in the end was done so amateurishly it was just laughable.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesMark Topping grew a beard for his role as Van Helsing.
- PatzerEarly in the film, Van Helsing opens a box of what are supposedly medical instruments, but instead they are antique drafting tools.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Bram Stoker's Van Helsing?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Ван Хельсінг Брема Стокера
- Drehorte
- England, Vereinigtes Königreich(main location)
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 25 Min.(85 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen




