Als seine Verlobte Lucy einer mysteriösen Krankheit zum Opfer fällt, wendet sich Arthur Holmwood an einen ehemaligen Rivalen in ihrer Zuneigung - Dr. John Seward - um Hilfe.Als seine Verlobte Lucy einer mysteriösen Krankheit zum Opfer fällt, wendet sich Arthur Holmwood an einen ehemaligen Rivalen in ihrer Zuneigung - Dr. John Seward - um Hilfe.Als seine Verlobte Lucy einer mysteriösen Krankheit zum Opfer fällt, wendet sich Arthur Holmwood an einen ehemaligen Rivalen in ihrer Zuneigung - Dr. John Seward - um Hilfe.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Apologies for being harsh but there's one sin of sins in my book when it comes to movies, and that's being dull.
I watched grass grow for half an hour once, and compared with this movie, it was an absolutely riveting, tension-filled thrill ride.
The actors all feel as though they're waiting for their cues and then, when given them by some poor desperate movie equivalent of a stage prompter, they seem reluctant to deliver any lines in a way that would catch the audience's attention. It's the verbal equivalent of camouflage - it just disappears into the background noise.
Don't get me wrong - if I had to deliver that supremely wooden dialogue, I would be reluctant too. But please, won't someone think of the audience! Just a little zest would have gone a long way.
It also claims to be from Van Helsing's POV which is a weeeee bit inaccurate, since Van Helsing plays a fairly limited role and disappears frequently, without any narration of the story from his supposed POV.
In fact, most of the first half of the movie is Lucy lying around moaning like she's having the time of her life with her best buddy Buzz under the sheets. Albeit somewhat unenthusiastically.
I have to admit, I nodded off at one point somewhere after the 50 minute mark - probably my brain trying to protect itself from a boredom-induced coma. But then I woke for the last 10 minutes, which included the most abrupt and boring ending... which was not really a surprise, come to think of it.
Rating - 2/10: would not recommend even as a sedative, since the potential for lasting boredom-induced brain damage is far too high.
I watched grass grow for half an hour once, and compared with this movie, it was an absolutely riveting, tension-filled thrill ride.
The actors all feel as though they're waiting for their cues and then, when given them by some poor desperate movie equivalent of a stage prompter, they seem reluctant to deliver any lines in a way that would catch the audience's attention. It's the verbal equivalent of camouflage - it just disappears into the background noise.
Don't get me wrong - if I had to deliver that supremely wooden dialogue, I would be reluctant too. But please, won't someone think of the audience! Just a little zest would have gone a long way.
It also claims to be from Van Helsing's POV which is a weeeee bit inaccurate, since Van Helsing plays a fairly limited role and disappears frequently, without any narration of the story from his supposed POV.
In fact, most of the first half of the movie is Lucy lying around moaning like she's having the time of her life with her best buddy Buzz under the sheets. Albeit somewhat unenthusiastically.
I have to admit, I nodded off at one point somewhere after the 50 minute mark - probably my brain trying to protect itself from a boredom-induced coma. But then I woke for the last 10 minutes, which included the most abrupt and boring ending... which was not really a surprise, come to think of it.
Rating - 2/10: would not recommend even as a sedative, since the potential for lasting boredom-induced brain damage is far too high.
Know how the actors prepared for their parts in this film? They got a chair and each went alone into the most deepest ,darkest forest they could find and sat there staring at the trees for 9 hours none stop !!!
After the first fifteen minutes I couldn't take anymore.
The movie horribly drags like it's in slow motion; add to that not one well known actor appears in the film.
I've seen every film interpretation of Bram Stoker's Dracula ever produced and can honestly state this is the worst adaptation to date.
Don't waste your time unless you enjoy torturing yourself.
The movie horribly drags like it's in slow motion; add to that not one well known actor appears in the film.
I've seen every film interpretation of Bram Stoker's Dracula ever produced and can honestly state this is the worst adaptation to date.
Don't waste your time unless you enjoy torturing yourself.
The guy must be turning in his grave.
This story has been told so many times, I do not see the point of yet another version. Why waste time and money with with amateur actors, poor production and minimal budget to make an amateurish version of Dracula?
There must other stories to be told... But, it seems, people have definitely run out of ideas. Because, all they can do is to do the same thing again and again again....
What next? A film combining zombies, vampires and werewolves and mummies?
This story has been told so many times, I do not see the point of yet another version. Why waste time and money with with amateur actors, poor production and minimal budget to make an amateurish version of Dracula?
There must other stories to be told... But, it seems, people have definitely run out of ideas. Because, all they can do is to do the same thing again and again again....
What next? A film combining zombies, vampires and werewolves and mummies?
Oh boy, here we go again.
A very poorly made film of a classic story that does not really need to be retold.
Poor acting and poor cast of said bad acting leave your stomach churning and wanting to press the stop button on this film at almost every point in the movie.
Save yourself the headache and discontent. Pass this movie over twice if you have to.
A very poorly made film of a classic story that does not really need to be retold.
Poor acting and poor cast of said bad acting leave your stomach churning and wanting to press the stop button on this film at almost every point in the movie.
Save yourself the headache and discontent. Pass this movie over twice if you have to.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesMark Topping grew a beard for his role as Van Helsing.
- PatzerEarly in the film, Van Helsing opens a box of what are supposedly medical instruments, but instead they are antique drafting tools.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Bram Stoker's Van Helsing?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Ван Хельсінг Брема Стокера
- Drehorte
- England, Vereinigtes Königreich(main location)
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 25 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Bram Stoker's Van Helsing (2021) officially released in Japan in Japanese?
Antwort