IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,5/10
2692
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Im Jahr 1999 wird der Teenager Rocío Wanninkhof ermordet. Die Ex-Partnerin ihrer Mutter, Dolores Vázquez, wird verdächtigt. Hat sie es getan? Ein zweites Opfer enthüllt die Wahrheit.Im Jahr 1999 wird der Teenager Rocío Wanninkhof ermordet. Die Ex-Partnerin ihrer Mutter, Dolores Vázquez, wird verdächtigt. Hat sie es getan? Ein zweites Opfer enthüllt die Wahrheit.Im Jahr 1999 wird der Teenager Rocío Wanninkhof ermordet. Die Ex-Partnerin ihrer Mutter, Dolores Vázquez, wird verdächtigt. Hat sie es getan? Ein zweites Opfer enthüllt die Wahrheit.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Alur pelaku mirip sama unlimited series 'Unbelievable'. Feel sorry for Delores who have to struggling after she was released and no one came to her to say sorry.
I had a particular interest in watching this new Netflix documentary, firstly because I live adjacent to Mijas and recognise it and other filmed neighbouring locations, but also because coincidentally I live next to a Spanish husband and wife who are actually judges in Malaga where much of the court action took place. The next time I see them I'll be asking them of their recollections of this case which is notorious for being a miscarriage of justice which saw an innocent woman convicted and serve over a year in prison before the true killer of two teenage Andalusian girls was finally revealed and convicted.
In 1999, a young Spanish woman Rocio Wanninkhof disappears on her way home from her boyfriend's house. Her body is later found some distance away, stabbed to death. A media frenzy ensues and a woman named Dolores Vasquez, who had been the lesbian lover of the deceased girl's mother, is charged, tried and convicted despite having no apparent motive or linking DNA evidence and indeed had an alibi the day of the victim's disappearance. In what seems a case of trial by media, this woman is convicted and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment, the inference being strongly made that her sexuality has in some way contributed to her guilt.
Four years later in a nearby town to the first murder location, another 17 year old girl is abducted from practically outside her parents' front door and afterwards found brutally killed close by. This time however the DNA under the slain girl's fingernails is processed and found to match that found at the first crime scene and it's definitely not Vasquez's.. As this news breaks to the general public, a woman living in the area who was once married to an immigrant Londoner called Tony King, formerly known as Tony Bromwich, who after she married him learned he had a criminal history of sexual attacks, including jail-time, reports her suspicions to the police. This leads to King / Bromwich, who still lives in the area, being at last convicted of the double murder. Ms Vasquez is naturally released from prison but receives no apology from the Spanish government or legal system and certainly no compensation for the travesty of justice she has undergone.
It was shocking to see how the Spanish legal system got this case so wrong from the start and how complicit the media was in getting the quick conviction of a clearly innocent woman. It was also disappointing to see Rocio's mother so unrepentant about the wrongful imprisonment of a woman with whom she once had a relationship. Perhaps the most telling indictment came from the mouth of the second victim's mother who pointedly asks if her daughter might be alive today if the Spanish authorities had more fully investigated the first crime and indeed responded more fully to warnings from Interpol about the newly emigrated King / Bromwich being a danger to society, especially women.
Very interesting to watch for me for a number of reasons, this film proved that there are certainly no national boundaries to things like police incompetence, shallow journalism and miscarriages of justice.. Nearly twenty years on from the events retold here, I have to hope that the Spanish law enforcement agencies learned from this infamous case and operates far more robustly and correctly today, not that I ever wish to experience this at first hand any time soon.
In 1999, a young Spanish woman Rocio Wanninkhof disappears on her way home from her boyfriend's house. Her body is later found some distance away, stabbed to death. A media frenzy ensues and a woman named Dolores Vasquez, who had been the lesbian lover of the deceased girl's mother, is charged, tried and convicted despite having no apparent motive or linking DNA evidence and indeed had an alibi the day of the victim's disappearance. In what seems a case of trial by media, this woman is convicted and sentenced to 15 years imprisonment, the inference being strongly made that her sexuality has in some way contributed to her guilt.
Four years later in a nearby town to the first murder location, another 17 year old girl is abducted from practically outside her parents' front door and afterwards found brutally killed close by. This time however the DNA under the slain girl's fingernails is processed and found to match that found at the first crime scene and it's definitely not Vasquez's.. As this news breaks to the general public, a woman living in the area who was once married to an immigrant Londoner called Tony King, formerly known as Tony Bromwich, who after she married him learned he had a criminal history of sexual attacks, including jail-time, reports her suspicions to the police. This leads to King / Bromwich, who still lives in the area, being at last convicted of the double murder. Ms Vasquez is naturally released from prison but receives no apology from the Spanish government or legal system and certainly no compensation for the travesty of justice she has undergone.
It was shocking to see how the Spanish legal system got this case so wrong from the start and how complicit the media was in getting the quick conviction of a clearly innocent woman. It was also disappointing to see Rocio's mother so unrepentant about the wrongful imprisonment of a woman with whom she once had a relationship. Perhaps the most telling indictment came from the mouth of the second victim's mother who pointedly asks if her daughter might be alive today if the Spanish authorities had more fully investigated the first crime and indeed responded more fully to warnings from Interpol about the newly emigrated King / Bromwich being a danger to society, especially women.
Very interesting to watch for me for a number of reasons, this film proved that there are certainly no national boundaries to things like police incompetence, shallow journalism and miscarriages of justice.. Nearly twenty years on from the events retold here, I have to hope that the Spanish law enforcement agencies learned from this infamous case and operates far more robustly and correctly today, not that I ever wish to experience this at first hand any time soon.
Pointing each other guilty without knowing the facts!! Without proof or even any useful Dna. A complete desaster.
I missed a lot of testimonies, and it feels like the police don't even admit their mistakes, only talk about their hard work!, This is not even close to hard work.
Very frustrating that the society falls for this, and is not able to form their own opinions any more about serious things, you are sending someone to jail!! %%$$##@@
The only nice images in this documentary are the ones from beatiful Spain.
THE MOST PAINFUL IS TO REALISE THAT THIS STILL HAPPENS TODAY!! INCREDIBLE!
I am from Spain, and yes.. it is still like that now, and of course worldwide.
I missed a lot of testimonies, and it feels like the police don't even admit their mistakes, only talk about their hard work!, This is not even close to hard work.
Very frustrating that the society falls for this, and is not able to form their own opinions any more about serious things, you are sending someone to jail!! %%$$##@@
The only nice images in this documentary are the ones from beatiful Spain.
THE MOST PAINFUL IS TO REALISE THAT THIS STILL HAPPENS TODAY!! INCREDIBLE!
I am from Spain, and yes.. it is still like that now, and of course worldwide.
Not surprised a wrong conviction was initially reached in an environment where there's endless talking and impassioned feelings but very little reasoning. In many societies, people wouldn't hesitate to judge, self-express, give opinions, and react, but very few are willing to reason, listen, analyze, question, and look at things from multiple perspectives.
What starts off as a generic true crime doc takes a few turns here and there that you may not see coming. The show has a lot of original interviews and some GOOD new shots of the coast of Malaga.
As it is the case with crime docs, it shows the dark side of an individual, but also that of the society along with its selfishness and greed.
It's a quick short watch. Check it out!
As it is the case with crime docs, it shows the dark side of an individual, but also that of the society along with its selfishness and greed.
It's a quick short watch. Check it out!
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Murder by the Coast?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Murder by the Coast
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 28 Min.(88 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen