Bhramam

Andhadhun is better than bhramam. Poor casting starting from mamtha to Ananya.

Direction wise poor. Only prithviraj, unnimukundan and jagadeesh justified the remake.

Not that I am comparing this with the original version. But this is a very sincere remake with very weak acting.

Casting is good but performances are not.

Prithvi is a good stoic actor but not a great one at it.

Mamta was good. Unni as usual is the muscle mass. Jagadish does his part.

Things looked too forced.

Now if you compare with andhadhun. Definitely Ayushman was just awesome With the fiery tabu it was just magical.

Now it's a different topic if Ayushman deserved a national award and no less.....

Watchable.

I don't understand the point of a scene to scene remake.! N if anybody could have done better with this role it would have been Fahaad Fazil. He would have added a new dimension to this whole movie.! This was a role not really suited to Prithvi.

Bhraman notably fails on casting.. While I think Prithviraj and Shankar pulled through however Mamta, Unni Mukundan and Rashi were poor choices. They didn't fit into the characters naturally to justify them.. Personally I think Asha Sharath (Drishyam fame) would have cracked this better.. There were gaps in Andhadhun's story telling which was gripping and left viewers second guessing.. Bhramam was almost like the tutorial class to the prequel. Too much clarification and explanations.. infact all my doubts from Hindi class got resolved after this.

Organ racketeers are brutal.. Jagadeesh was comical and sympathetic.. Worse part.. a Malayalam song in a Paris club sung by Prithviraj and some cheap foreigners for extras..

Basic story , not satisfying dubbing , poor music and dialogue.