Apartment 7A

"Apartment 7A" is a 2024 psychological thriller that serves as a prequel to the iconic horror film "Rosemary's Baby." It follows Terry Gionoffrio, an aspiring actress grappling with a career-ending injury, as she moves into the infamous Bramford building.

What Works: * Strong Performances: Julia Garner delivers a compelling performance as Terry, capturing her vulnerability and growing paranoia convincingly. Dianne Wiest and Kevin McNally, as the unsettling Castevets, are suitably eerie and unsettling.

* Atmospheric Setting: The film effectively recreates the eerie ambiance of the Bramford building, with its claustrophobic corridors and unsettling undertones.

What Could Be Better: * Pacing Issues: The first half of the film feels slow-paced, struggling to build suspense and tension effectively.

* Lack of Innovation: While it pays homage to the original, "Apartment 7A" doesn't offer much new to the table. It relies heavily on familiar tropes and fails to truly capitalize on its chilling premise.

* Uneven Horror Elements: The film struggles to blend its horror elements seamlessly. Some scenes are genuinely unsettling, while others feel forced or underwhelming.

Overall: "Apartment 7A" is a decent watch for fans of "Rosemary's Baby" who are curious about the backstory. However, it ultimately fails to reach the chilling heights of its predecessor. While the performances are strong and the atmosphere is suitably eerie, the film suffers from pacing issues and a lack of originality.

Recommendation: Rent or stream it if you're a fan of the original and enjoy psychological thrillers.

Disclaimer: This is just one perspective, and individual opinions may vary.

Okay. So I liked the period part of this.

And did I remember before I started watching this that it was a prequel to Ira Levin's novel/Roman Polanski's film? No. Didn't dawn on me until I said to myself, "Self, there's Dianne Wiest! And she's doing a Ruth Gordon impression? Oh, duh. This is that Rosemary's Baby cash grab that was put into production because Satanic pregnancies are all the rage in this post-Dobbs landscape." I think this is the 8th devil fetus movie this year alone. But here we are.

I like Dianne Wiest. I don't think Julie Garner was horrible. But this seemed more like a rehash of the Mia Farrow classic - with some aspects a scene-for-scene matchup. Yeah, it's with a single unwed mom set in the pre-Roe era. I mean that is the film's entire premise and reason for existing.

But the film doesn't expand on the Leviniverse beyond saying that things at the Bramford go back before the Woodhouses moved in.

Also, I don't get why they didn't just get Josh Groban for the Josh Groban guy. The did-get guy was easy to look at but the entire time I couldn't stop thinking he was supposed to be Josh Groban.

The movie is watchable. Nothing groundbreaking, nothing must-see, nothing revelatory narrative-wise. It's fine. I did find the ending somewhat pleasant while odd but entirely foreseeable.

I get that there are quite a few fans of the original (if you can call it that since this is a prequel), I understand that stories could have been tied better... But, you know what? This is a good movie. The main character is likeable, smart, and relatable. The story is interesting and well-paced. There are some creepy characters but they never felt cartoonish. I enjoyed it a lot and it's one of the best horror movies of 2024.

By now you probably know the story and even how it ends, but try to enjoy this movie as a stand-alone. Try not to bother yourself "nobody asked for this, originality is dead", watch it and you just might like it.

This is not enough of a movie to the name, Rosemary baby is probably the best horror movie of all time, this movie is good but is not trying enough.

Its an interesting movie to watch and Garner is an incredible actress and everyone knows that, but the story and the distinct horror presented in here is not solid enough and that's a shame because this movie looks very good.

The other cast does an increible job too, it really feels like a proper prequel of RB but its lacking the suspense, its s shame really it should have been better than this

Its never going to be in the same level as the original but its ok, that's obvious and expected, this was a good try.

In 1965, the aspiring dancer Theresa "Terry" Gionoffrio (Julia Garner) moves from Nebraska to New York City expecting to win fame and fortune. However, during the rehearsal of a play, she breaks her ankle and falls in disgrace in the artistic environment. When she goes to the audition of the play "The Pale Crook", she is humiliated by the producer Alan Marchand (Jim Sturgess). Terry follows him to beg another chance and when he arrives at his apartment building, the Bramford, she feels sick and throws up. The old couple Minnie Castevet (Dianne Wiest) and Roman Castevet (Kevin McNally) help her on the street and bring her home. They do not have children and offer the apartment 7A that is empty to Terry. She moves from the house of her friend Annie Leung (Marli Siu) to the apartment at the Bramford. Soon her life progresses but she feels that there is something evil in the Bramsford.

"Apartment 7A" (2024) is a great prequel to Roman Polanski's masterpiece "Rosemary's Baby" (1968). The atmospheric plot is creepy, and Julia Garner has a great performance in the role of an ambitious young woman that intends to be successful in New York City dancing, but stumbles upon worshipers of the devil. The viewer will certainly feel sorry for the fate of Terry and there is a cliffhanger for the film by Roman Polanski. Unfortunately, it took more than fifty years to make and release this prequel. Now I will revisit "Rosemary's Baby" again to remember details from this unforgettable movie. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Apartamento 7A" ("Apartment 7A")