Battlefield 2042

Ok so every game launch is messy especially this one lots of bugs lots of missing features and lots of hit registration issues the main problem though is it seems kinda lifeless even with the new 128 players the some of the maps are too large the larger maps all the players just do there own thing so here you are traveling alone to the nearest objective i believe that later on it will change a lot i mean they even said that there will be a major update soon I personally want more chaos more explosions more life so thats it dont take the bad reviews into consideration because this games gonna change a lot bf4 was like this at launch only one other review said that so yeah thats my review.

Alot of bad choices mad here, including the "no pats" undertones and rubbish class system which doesn't make any sense when you are fighting russian vs usa anyway? ?

the game when it is working is actually a hep[ of fun, when it works, 9 times out of 10 in the first month your lucky not to have to restart at least 4 times an hour on pc.

Probably better to go play hello kitty island adventure.

Bad graphics make everything look plastic. Sound design is bad. Maps are uninteresting. Movement is slow with no way to adjust sensitivity. Feels unfinished. I have no idea how this was approved for release.

EA will hopefully go bankrupt after this. The game is trash don't play it. Imagine making just a multiplayer game and the multiplayer isn't even fun? Stay woke go broke.

Plot

In the near future the world has entered a set of constant chaos with a massive immigration crisis birthing a rebellion against the last all encompassing world government.

Cast

Not familiar.

Verdict

I grew up with first person shooters, but by that I mean Doom, Wolfenstein, Hexen, Rise of the Triad and more. When the multi-player generation kicked in I was rarely impressed, Medal of Honor? No thanks. Call of Duty? Meh. Online CoD bored me whereas Battlefield I got a level of enjoyment from. I could never understand why anybody would choose CoD over Battlefield.

Battlefield had bigger environments, more players in battles, vehicles (Ground, water and air) it was just superior in every way to me.

When Battlefield 2042 came out I remember hearing wall to wall complaints, people hated it so when I went in I assumed the worst. The thing is the complaints were never really specific, they were just claims they didn't like the game but rarely an explanation of why. Yes it had bugs, but what AAA games doesn't shortly after release? The trouble is it's over two years later and there are still bugs present, mostly frustrating graphical ones.

The game itself is solid enough, though a bit all over the place as it's set across multiple time periods and tries to be a bit too grandiose for its own good. WW2 battles? Sure. Modern battles? Sure. Futuristic battles? Sure. It makes loadouts a pain in the butt and I didn't like that it was so all over the place.

Everything else however is fine, the mechanics are solid, the locations are varied, every box is ticked so why the hatred?

It's not the best Battlefield game, but it's a decent enough entry.

Rants

No seriously, why do people choose CoD over Battlefield? I believe it's changed recently but prior the environments were tiny by comparison. You couldn't turn a corner without running into an enemy. No vehicles, fewer players....why!? Battlefield saw you riding a jeep across a sprawling environment, tanks roaring beside you, planes engaged in dogfights above, superior in every conceivable way.

Breakdown

Lots of environments Great logistics Multiple time periods don't work Unforgivable bugs.