IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,3/10
1810
IHRE BEWERTUNG
In einer dystopischen Zukunft weiß der Vatikan, wie man Menschen wieder auferstehen lässt. Ein Priester entdeckt eine Verschwörung hinter den Wiederauferstehungen und deren mögliche Verbindu... Alles lesenIn einer dystopischen Zukunft weiß der Vatikan, wie man Menschen wieder auferstehen lässt. Ein Priester entdeckt eine Verschwörung hinter den Wiederauferstehungen und deren mögliche Verbindung zu einer Reihe von Morden.In einer dystopischen Zukunft weiß der Vatikan, wie man Menschen wieder auferstehen lässt. Ein Priester entdeckt eine Verschwörung hinter den Wiederauferstehungen und deren mögliche Verbindung zu einer Reihe von Morden.
Michael Villar
- Frank Collins
- (as Michael Javier Villar)
Maryna Bennett
- Rose Patterson
- (as a different name)
Ahmed Mawas
- Sayid Aboud
- (as Ahmed El-Mawas)
Carolyn Alise
- Anna
- (as Carolyn A'Lise)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I was really surprised to see how good this movie turned out to be, seeing as it is so lowly considered here on IMDB.
The movie deserves a much higher rating being that it has such an original story, solid writing, acting, pacing, and follow-through from beginning to end.
Joe Rechtman does a fantastic job, and it's enjoyable from beginning to end.
I found the immediate premise interesting and something significant to most people, which is what happens after death, and what could happen if we were able to resurrect, and all the complexities that go along with it.
The pitfalls, the power, the problems, and the promise of second chances.
The movie deserves a much higher rating being that it has such an original story, solid writing, acting, pacing, and follow-through from beginning to end.
Joe Rechtman does a fantastic job, and it's enjoyable from beginning to end.
I found the immediate premise interesting and something significant to most people, which is what happens after death, and what could happen if we were able to resurrect, and all the complexities that go along with it.
The pitfalls, the power, the problems, and the promise of second chances.
I'm not even 15 minutes into it and I'm completely distracted by the grease pit that is the mother's hair. Whoever was in charge of costuming, why would they think that that was a good look for her. It's distracting and dirty, looking in literally every scene so far. Really really really gross.
I'm not even 15 minutes into it and I'm completely distracted by the grease pit that is the mother's hair. Whoever was in charge of costuming, why would they think that that was a good look for her. It's distracting and dirty, looking in literally every scene so far. Really really really gross.
Realy really really gross.
I'm not even 15 minutes into it and I'm completely distracted by the grease pit that is the mother's hair. Whoever was in charge of costuming, why would they think that that was a good look for her. It's distracting and dirty, looking in literally every scene so far. Really really really gross.
Realy really really gross.
I'm going to start by saying that I wasn't the biggest fan of this type of movies, ever since I saw Unsane, it just didn't feel right to me.
With time tho, came Unfriended, Searching, Ressurected and little by little I came to appreciate this new way of filming. It's different but it's different good, and I felt like I should give it a proper chance.
Now that movies like Resurrected are part of the new norm, I think they deserve respect for the fact that they use very small budgets in order to happen. So from in the woods movies, or zombie ones, we now have in face of the PC films that deliver a lot on tension, plot, mystery, but of course lack aspects like horror or true jump scares...at least for now.
Resurrected kept me interested from its start to the very end, I have to admit that the plot comes out as, well original really, a new subject, a great approach to it, without revealing too much about the technique involved, leaving the viewer to roam his imagination free. The plot here is the monster in other horrors, like Jaw, Cloverfield, where they get very little screen time, but once you see them...it's more than enough.
So all in all, Resurrected was a fun surprise, I liked it a lot, I tried to connect all the dots and see where this one is heading. Definitely recommended, has a lot of strong points.
Cheers!
With time tho, came Unfriended, Searching, Ressurected and little by little I came to appreciate this new way of filming. It's different but it's different good, and I felt like I should give it a proper chance.
Now that movies like Resurrected are part of the new norm, I think they deserve respect for the fact that they use very small budgets in order to happen. So from in the woods movies, or zombie ones, we now have in face of the PC films that deliver a lot on tension, plot, mystery, but of course lack aspects like horror or true jump scares...at least for now.
Resurrected kept me interested from its start to the very end, I have to admit that the plot comes out as, well original really, a new subject, a great approach to it, without revealing too much about the technique involved, leaving the viewer to roam his imagination free. The plot here is the monster in other horrors, like Jaw, Cloverfield, where they get very little screen time, but once you see them...it's more than enough.
So all in all, Resurrected was a fun surprise, I liked it a lot, I tried to connect all the dots and see where this one is heading. Definitely recommended, has a lot of strong points.
Cheers!
Yes, it is a webcam- and chat-based movie. Which makes me wonder how well packed it is with action, that keeps you edge-seated. One third of the time are action scenes, shot again on webcams of all kinds.
Poster on IMDB page contains the poorest possible screenshot from the movie, please just disregard it. You may have your answer why this exact 3D is so rubbish when you watch the movie.
Key strength is a script. It's hard not to give away any detail, let's say the story contains ethical questions around religion, conspiracy theory, and several solid twists. Couple of gory scenes. No horror at all to my personal standards. Performances are better than one would expect.
My only criticism would be around final scenes, when it all breaks loose.. those could have been more.. spectacular, but I believe this is owing to budget limitations only.
Btw, don't skip final titles, the story is continued there.
Poster on IMDB page contains the poorest possible screenshot from the movie, please just disregard it. You may have your answer why this exact 3D is so rubbish when you watch the movie.
Key strength is a script. It's hard not to give away any detail, let's say the story contains ethical questions around religion, conspiracy theory, and several solid twists. Couple of gory scenes. No horror at all to my personal standards. Performances are better than one would expect.
My only criticism would be around final scenes, when it all breaks loose.. those could have been more.. spectacular, but I believe this is owing to budget limitations only.
Btw, don't skip final titles, the story is continued there.
No, it's not revolutionary or even 'good', but it IS okay if found footage is your thing and you've run out. The premise is actually interesting, it would make a good big budget movie/or a series! (maybe there is already one, maybe I've missed it?)
But would I watch this again? No.
Would I recommend it? For one viewing yes, if this type of movie is your thing.
Will you miss anything by skipping this movie? Not really, but again, interesting premise!
I feel like the actors did fine with what they had. The face time filming thing wasn't terribly done for what it was, it can usually be worse! It was cleanly made and not a nightmare to get through. I actually cared about the main character.
So over all, not too bad, but I don't think I'd have the free time to spend rewatching this in the face of other films.
But would I watch this again? No.
Would I recommend it? For one viewing yes, if this type of movie is your thing.
Will you miss anything by skipping this movie? Not really, but again, interesting premise!
I feel like the actors did fine with what they had. The face time filming thing wasn't terribly done for what it was, it can usually be worse! It was cleanly made and not a nightmare to get through. I actually cared about the main character.
So over all, not too bad, but I don't think I'd have the free time to spend rewatching this in the face of other films.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAlle Einträge enthalten Spoiler
- PatzerJust after Stan subdues Agent Ortiz by slashing her throat, he turns back to his computer and accidentally calls to Rat but says "Cat?"
- VerbindungenReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 967: Here (2024)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Resurrected?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Rebirth - Die Apokalypse beginnt
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 191.359 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 37 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen