Reunion

With its B-movie cast, director Chris Nelson's murder-mystery comedy "Reunion" should be B-movie standard, but despite not being lol funny its whodunnit plot (from debut writer Willie Block & second-time Jake Emanuel) keep it engaging enough. Small-town douche Chace Crawford is slain at a 'Class of 01' high-school reunion at his mansion, with suspicion falling on those trapped there overnight (and subsequent days) by a huge snow-storm: Lil Rel Howery; politician Nina Dobrev; cop Billy Magnussen (good); reporter Jamie Chung; oddball Jillian Bell (meh); & teacher Michael Hitchcock... but whodunnit? It won't sweep any awards, but it ain't too bad.

If you have seen The Afterparty, or at least the first season, then you've seen this movie already.

It really just is a movie version of that whole season.

They've tweaked a few moments and characters, but it's not even slightly disguised in any real way.

The cast is slightly better than the cast in the series, and the budget is clearly slightly higher, but that's about it.

If you haven't seen season one of The Afterparty, then you might like this, if you like mediocre, uninspired murder mysteries. It's not terrible, just eh.

Not a whole lot more I can say, to be honest. Oh, it's better than season 2 of The Afterparty, so it has that going for it.

What in God's name was this!

Half a movie looking like a bad teenage movie with bad acting and childish humour. Jokes and gags about sex, drinking and more sex are about 20 years old. Arrogant characters putting down weak-willing ones with the odd crazed one making stupid comments is also 20 years old.

Then out of nowhere come the finale and the whole plot of the movie comes out. A crime solved with the motive and murderers blurted out l, with details only the writers knew about. Totally ridiculous and pointless ending. And no reason to care about any of the characters either.

Oh, and there's another black character who just rambles constantly and is incessantly annoying, while throwing in the odd curse like a "tru-bro" does. How unoriginal.

Basically a load of utter rubbish!

I think the score of 5 is pretty harsh, I actually thought this movie was really good.

True it could have been a bit polished in certain places and packed in even more jokes, but I enjoyed it.

I think Lil Rel Howery is brilliant in this, he almost reminds me of Kevin Hart, who might have been a better lead in this, just due to the fact he is such a great comedian and would have brought more laughs in.

The cast is good; they're all established actors, but I can't help but feel a different cast would have made a massive difference. I like Jamie Chung, I like Nina Dobrev, but not all actors suit comedy roles.

I did like the murder reveal at the end, guessed part of it, but the final reveal was a bit of a surprise.

All in all, had some really good laughs, could have been better but I enjoyed it.

I'd of given it a 6.25 actually maybe.

So, the film, overall, is a good watch. It is entertaining, it has some good quips and the acting doesn't completely suck.

It's the same as a B-rated horror movie I'd say, but actually a bit better.

The cinemtagrophy and the the pace of the movie is good for what it is.

The character Vivian is well written and showcases "neuro-spicy" in a funny and non-mean way. I found her character to be quite original and enjoyed her.

The rest of the characters are also written to fit their physical, mental, and occupational features as well.

As previously mentioned, the pace of the film is honestly about perfect for a murder mystery.

I don't believe most of any of us would see the twist coming, which is really the only issue with the movie in my opinion.

What do I mean? Well, I have categories of "murder mysteries" that I find simplify what concepts I mean.

Some are akin to the Scooby-Doo mystery type murders... where basically you could usually never guess who the culprit actually is.

Some may argue, sure... you may be lucky sometimes... but mostly... there are never enough clues or foreshadowing or developed story to truly know from observation who the killer is.

This movie obviously wasn't meet to be a deep thriller.

That being said, once again, the main issue is still how the reveal is done.

The story itself isn't the problem, it's the fact that it seems it was put together at the last minute as a "We have a deadline people who are we putting this murder on?!?"

I didn't expect a work of Shakespeare but it would have been nice to have actual clues, foreshadowing, and proper plot flow on how the film ended.

The way it was done, it could have been anyone, and it just detracts from the movie as a whole.

Sure, many movies do this... but once again... the "Scooby-Doo" effect was strong with this one. More perceived backstory and hints would have came a long way instead of the ending feeling as if it was just put together last minute. It's almost as it was written completely seperately from someone pulling a name out of a hate and writing the story around that person regardless of the first half of the movie.

The twist is actually a good one, and the character that solves the mystery really shows how observant and intelligent he is.

It didn't have to be a Sherlock Holmes... no, but could have added much needed depth to an otherwise shallow plot.

:The movie is a good watch, the characters fit their profiles for who and what they are. There are some great quips and general comedy in the film. However, not enough foreshadowing and a way to follow the clues to come to a consensus for the person watching the film.

For the long explanation, see above.

Thank you.