IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,9/10
3172
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Als die örtliche Mafia auftaucht, um ihr Restaurant niederzubrennen, verteidigt Ana, eine Köchin mit einer akribischen Vergangenheit, ihr Revier und beweist ihre Messerkünste in und außerhal... Alles lesenAls die örtliche Mafia auftaucht, um ihr Restaurant niederzubrennen, verteidigt Ana, eine Köchin mit einer akribischen Vergangenheit, ihr Revier und beweist ihre Messerkünste in und außerhalb der Küche.Als die örtliche Mafia auftaucht, um ihr Restaurant niederzubrennen, verteidigt Ana, eine Köchin mit einer akribischen Vergangenheit, ihr Revier und beweist ihre Messerkünste in und außerhalb der Küche.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I wasn't expecting much, but I was pleasantly surprised after watching this well-paced 84 min action-comedy film. This is newb filmmaker Zach Golden's second full length feature film as director, and he did not disappoint. It is also James Pedersen's first ever writing credit, and although not perfect, it was still fun. Although some characters were your typical cliched mobsters with cliched dialogue, it still worked, and actually had some laugh out loud moments. All casting and performances were spot-on and convincing, and Golden did a great job directing his cast, especially for a newb director. Even the action scenes were exceptionally filmed and well choreographed. The dark humor was mostly hit with a few misses. Johnson and Kurylenko (who looked stunning) worked very well together, as did Kaitlin Doubleday and Chris Diamantopoulos and their twin daughters, who were a hilarious family right out of the Griswold's playbook. Even the score and cinematography were great, especially for a B film. It's not a perfect film, but it's one of the better and more entertaining B films I've seen this year, and worth a one-time watch. It's a well deserved 7/10 from me.
Well, seeing Don Johnson and Olga Kurylenko work on the same project is always tempting and interesting, however doesn't necessarily mean that it will be a winning combination. This movie is kind of a mixture between Mr & Mrs Smith meets Desperate Housewifes meets Boiling Point. The director wanted to put this all together and hope for a fun outcome, but it ended up being a drag although it is only 80 minutes... The side roles appear suddenly like they fall from the sky with no whatsoever background story or connection, just a few sentences between them to get it over with. The story is the cheesiest possible and reminds of an old school action movies when everyone was a former KGB or Cia agent etc.. In the end very boring and dragged out movie although with Don and Olga on board had the potential for more fun.
Despite the run time is 1h24m which is in movie terms a little above being a short , you'd still feel the pace is really slow that you can do errands at time of watching and not miss much .
As for the plot , basically the upcoming hints are incorporated in trailers , so hardly a spoiler yet at least not from my behalf .
So they tried to kill her "kitchen" so this ex spy go on a hunt to kill all Mafia elements involved in this plot , they keep throwing at her multiple assassins but she get rid of them all .
If this doesn't remind you of John Wick (a lite version of him perhaps) then you probably haven't seen John Wick (Needless to say they do not reach the fight scenes level) .
Funny enough even both are Russians in their plots .
As for the plot , basically the upcoming hints are incorporated in trailers , so hardly a spoiler yet at least not from my behalf .
So they tried to kill her "kitchen" so this ex spy go on a hunt to kill all Mafia elements involved in this plot , they keep throwing at her multiple assassins but she get rid of them all .
If this doesn't remind you of John Wick (a lite version of him perhaps) then you probably haven't seen John Wick (Needless to say they do not reach the fight scenes level) .
Funny enough even both are Russians in their plots .
As much as I love Olga Kurylenko and I do! Even she couldn't carry this mess of a film. It has nothing one can sink their teeth into. I hate to bash on a film but some are "so" bad it can't be helped. The story goes nowhere and ends nowhere. Plus, it's all been done before. Makes me ask myself what is going on with Hollywood Film Making? Their just throwing out pieces like this bomb and not paying attention to their viewers likes. Olga has become one of the best in her field and is truly is a joy to watch. Don Johnson is a well established actor, watching them play off one another wasn't bad. But this film is just a waste of time I'll never view again.
The premise sounds fun, and with Olga Kurylenko and Don Johnson also involved I had high hopes. I see the sparks of potential in James Pedersen's screenplay, with hard-hitting action counterbalanced by wry humor; a story of mob and KGB ties returning to haunt Ray and Ana is adjoined with notes of domestic squabbles. The stunts, effects, and otherwise action violence is sharp and terrific, the humor is far too variable but ranges from mildly amusing to cheekily funny, the music adds delightful flavor wherever it raises its head, and the production values reflect the best of modern standards. The cast give excellent performances full of personality, with Kurylenko absolutely standing out with the hard-nosed severity she carries as trained assassin Ana; given smaller supporting parts, I dare say Kaitlin Doubleday, Chris Diamantopoulos, and Bianca and Chiara D'Ambrosio steal the show from all others, and threaten to also upstage Kurylenko.
Yet speaking of those supporting figures, therein lies a prime example of the troubles 'High heat' faces. Kurylenko and Johnson are the stars, but for as much as everyone else dominates the screen, Kurylenko and Johnson almost feel like the support. It's D'Ambrosio and D'Ambrosio who earn the first of only a couple laughs at about the 53-minute mark, and though it's not true across the board, it's the twins, and Doubleday and Diamantopoulos, who seem to benefit from some of the strongest writing. On the other hand, Jackie Long and his character Gary have way too much screen time and aren't as clever as anyone thought. As the picture switches moods to and fro - seen not least in a scene between Long and Diamantopoulos, and also exemplified in Max Di Carlo's music - the pacing drags even more than it already was with excessive scenes of dialogue between Dallas Page, Ivan Martin, and other mafia figures, all of whom seem to speak with an especial droning cadence and timbre. There's unfortunate imbalance between the different ideas here: the action really does look great, but it's deemphasized; the humor adds a bit of fun, though is inconsistent both in its quality and in its dispensation; the narrative in and of itself, and the simple drama it should carry, is smaller than one would ever suppose.
In a runtime of 84 minutes we're one-quarter through before the action kicks up; following the climax, the last beat to resolve the plot in the denouement sails past with a strangely casual, almost indifferent tenor. The diminished presence of Kurylenko and Johnson may have worked if the screenplay were structured differently - say, if it were built to show the persistent efforts and failures of bad guys to bring down Ana, Ray, and the Etoile Rouge, and being foiled at every turn; a more high-octane rendition of 'Home alone, if you will. In that hypothetical circumstance, too, the more selective bursts of action may be fitting, provided a more comedic edge in their stead. As it stands, all too little of 'High heat' feels like it's coming together just right, and the proportions are off in too many important ways. Director Zach Golden has a hard time finding the right tone, too, demonstrating that Pedersen and Di Carlo weren't the only contributors to be dogged by these issues. The crew behind the scenes turned in fine work, and I appreciate the cast, but the end result is an action-comedy where neither the action nor the comedy are particularly satisfying, and a vehicle for two stars who take the back seat to their co-stars.
None of this is to say that I didn't enjoy the feature, and for something light and uninvolved it's a decent enough way to spend one's time. The problem is that too many elements feel a little wrong, and there's no major stroke of brilliance or jolt of vitality to help carry the day. It's entertaining, but no more so than the least of most titles. I'm glad for those who get more out of 'High heat' than I do, and I admire what it does well, but I think this dish needed a different mixture of the same ingredients, cooked longer and more thoroughly, to have really met with the desired success.
Yet speaking of those supporting figures, therein lies a prime example of the troubles 'High heat' faces. Kurylenko and Johnson are the stars, but for as much as everyone else dominates the screen, Kurylenko and Johnson almost feel like the support. It's D'Ambrosio and D'Ambrosio who earn the first of only a couple laughs at about the 53-minute mark, and though it's not true across the board, it's the twins, and Doubleday and Diamantopoulos, who seem to benefit from some of the strongest writing. On the other hand, Jackie Long and his character Gary have way too much screen time and aren't as clever as anyone thought. As the picture switches moods to and fro - seen not least in a scene between Long and Diamantopoulos, and also exemplified in Max Di Carlo's music - the pacing drags even more than it already was with excessive scenes of dialogue between Dallas Page, Ivan Martin, and other mafia figures, all of whom seem to speak with an especial droning cadence and timbre. There's unfortunate imbalance between the different ideas here: the action really does look great, but it's deemphasized; the humor adds a bit of fun, though is inconsistent both in its quality and in its dispensation; the narrative in and of itself, and the simple drama it should carry, is smaller than one would ever suppose.
In a runtime of 84 minutes we're one-quarter through before the action kicks up; following the climax, the last beat to resolve the plot in the denouement sails past with a strangely casual, almost indifferent tenor. The diminished presence of Kurylenko and Johnson may have worked if the screenplay were structured differently - say, if it were built to show the persistent efforts and failures of bad guys to bring down Ana, Ray, and the Etoile Rouge, and being foiled at every turn; a more high-octane rendition of 'Home alone, if you will. In that hypothetical circumstance, too, the more selective bursts of action may be fitting, provided a more comedic edge in their stead. As it stands, all too little of 'High heat' feels like it's coming together just right, and the proportions are off in too many important ways. Director Zach Golden has a hard time finding the right tone, too, demonstrating that Pedersen and Di Carlo weren't the only contributors to be dogged by these issues. The crew behind the scenes turned in fine work, and I appreciate the cast, but the end result is an action-comedy where neither the action nor the comedy are particularly satisfying, and a vehicle for two stars who take the back seat to their co-stars.
None of this is to say that I didn't enjoy the feature, and for something light and uninvolved it's a decent enough way to spend one's time. The problem is that too many elements feel a little wrong, and there's no major stroke of brilliance or jolt of vitality to help carry the day. It's entertaining, but no more so than the least of most titles. I'm glad for those who get more out of 'High heat' than I do, and I admire what it does well, but I think this dish needed a different mixture of the same ingredients, cooked longer and more thoroughly, to have really met with the desired success.
Wusstest du schon
- PatzerWhen Mimi is driving to the restaurant she is supposedly speeding and accelerates multiple times. The view out the back window of the car shows cars behind her in multiple lanes the same distance away. The view never matches her changes in speed.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is High Heat?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 6.257 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 24 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen