IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,7/10
7233
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThree twenty-somethings find themselves in an impossible time loop, where each day they awaken to the same terrifying day as the preceding one.Three twenty-somethings find themselves in an impossible time loop, where each day they awaken to the same terrifying day as the preceding one.Three twenty-somethings find themselves in an impossible time loop, where each day they awaken to the same terrifying day as the preceding one.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 9 Nominierungen insgesamt
Ben Immanuel
- Bob Simpson
- (as Benjamin Ratner)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This isn't for everyone, but I do think they accomplished what they were attempting and the acting is mostly good, especially the leads.
It is like Groundhog Day, but way darker and less fun. The major twist is there are three people stuck, and since they are scum bags in rehab, they do all sorts of questionable things on their repeated day.
What really makes it interesting is when they start turning on each other... and remembering it the next day.
Not the best ever. The tone kind of reminds me of The River's Edge and Boys Club.
But ultimately it is surprisingly touching and you feel sad for the person you don't expect to.
It is like Groundhog Day, but way darker and less fun. The major twist is there are three people stuck, and since they are scum bags in rehab, they do all sorts of questionable things on their repeated day.
What really makes it interesting is when they start turning on each other... and remembering it the next day.
Not the best ever. The tone kind of reminds me of The River's Edge and Boys Club.
But ultimately it is surprisingly touching and you feel sad for the person you don't expect to.
Where do I even start with this trash. Dear Arne Olson, Stop it. Just stop it. I can't begin to understand how a sane person could sit down to create a movie and think, "I have an idea. How about we make Groundhogs day. But this time it will be about a few drug abusing lunatics." The acting was amateur at best. I can't altogether blame the actors as the dialogue of the script likely resembled a high school play. The character's were very difficult to identify with in any way. What bother's me the most is that there are two people on earth, the writer, and the director who actually think that this is a real mind twisting, deep, original work of cinema. I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone outside of an animal in a coma.
Any movie set in the country where trees outnumber the cast/crew and plausible town population is well on its way to drawing me in. The scene sets the mood for any film and it was chosen wisely for this Canadian country thriller. The filmmakers gave a taste of the natural surroundings of the location to give some of its own say in the plot which is a big win. It had a bit of feel from Rambo/First Blood where you get the environment playing a part in the characters with strong sounds from the river and a dirt bike. The dialog came across as unforced and played out creatively into a spire of events that held high entertainment value. Mid level psychological value but more entertaining than trying to draw on conceptual values over its own path and plot. This film kept me watching without a yawn and did a quality job of taking the expected state of affairs to the next level. While admittedly most movies drawn up these days use a bit of the same sleazy concepts, this one I believe nestles down into its own unique little fortified holding and fires upon the viewer with a quality helping of raw.
The cast and crew of this film know what it takes to make an interesting movie. I was quite surprised to discover it was a Canadian thriller comprised of all Canadian actors and crew. I did not realize this until after I watched the movie and then checked out the movie's details on IMDb. Repeaters' repeating theme is sort of another take on Groundhog Day starring Bill Murray and though this duplication takes away from any claim Repeaters could have to originality the two movies are totally different in plot and genre. There are some unexplained parts in the storyline's flow but I do not think they are strong enough to throw the audience out of it's constant comprehension of the general stream. In other words Repeaters has the ability to entrance an audience and so thereby can be appreciated as a good, reasonable piece of movie entertainment. My congratulations go out to the crew and to the talented young actors for not engaging in melodrama but instead delivering a good, down-to-earth performance with excellent production effects. Let's see more of these 'way to do it' movies which appear so very together. Well done, cast and crew - 'you've got the feel'!
Excellent cast decent story kept me watching till the very good ending. Not an oscar contender but worth the watch decent cast decent cinematography and I was never bored. It's a basic concept but works starts a little slow but kicks in after the premise is set.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAlle Einträge enthalten Spoiler
- PatzerAt about 46 minutes in, Kyle and Mike have an argument that gets physical. Mike slams Kyle into the rear passenger side of Kyle's truck behind the back wheel, which apparently creates a huge bash/dent. You can't miss seeing this huge dent when Mike then pulls away with his Chevelle after the fight is over.
Then in the very next scene, Kyle, with Sonia as passenger, pulls his truck into a parking lot and parks. And even though it's dark, that huge dent is OBVIOUSLY not there.
- Crazy CreditsPre-credits title card: "Don't wait for the last judgement. It happens every day." - Albert Camus
- SoundtracksKettering
Performed by The Antlers
Written by Peter Silberman
Courtesy of Frenchkiss Records
By arrangment with The Orchard
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Repeaters?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 1.600.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 29 Min.(89 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen