IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,3/10
10.187
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ty Warner war ein frustrierter Spielzeugverkäufer, bis seine Idee durch die Zusammenarbeit mit drei Frauen zum größten Spielzeugwahn der Geschichte wurde.Ty Warner war ein frustrierter Spielzeugverkäufer, bis seine Idee durch die Zusammenarbeit mit drei Frauen zum größten Spielzeugwahn der Geschichte wurde.Ty Warner war ein frustrierter Spielzeugverkäufer, bis seine Idee durch die Zusammenarbeit mit drei Frauen zum größten Spielzeugwahn der Geschichte wurde.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
A very interesting movie about the back story behind the craziness of the Beanie plush toy ...I remember the beanie babies ...who crazy people where getting with them...it depict rather well how crazy the last part of the 80's, the 90's. The social trend of the day, the arrival of the WWW/internet. All this with a very good rhythm.
How this young woman daughter of immigrant saw that the net could be used to measure demand, increase sale etc she was year ahead of the rest. It also depict the founder of the Ty Toy Corp. How this man-child could manipulate people while maintaining his child like creativity. This emotionally abused man was generous only to outsider, to insider he was repeating the pattern he learn from his father.
Based on some of the truth behind the crave that was the beanie babies ...fetching price on the after market that parallel the tulip bulb in the Renaissance Holland...(the first but not the last case study of crazy speculation cause by imbalance between desirability & limited supply).
The choice of going back & forth could be an issue for some. But it does finally make a circle on itself.
How this young woman daughter of immigrant saw that the net could be used to measure demand, increase sale etc she was year ahead of the rest. It also depict the founder of the Ty Toy Corp. How this man-child could manipulate people while maintaining his child like creativity. This emotionally abused man was generous only to outsider, to insider he was repeating the pattern he learn from his father.
Based on some of the truth behind the crave that was the beanie babies ...fetching price on the after market that parallel the tulip bulb in the Renaissance Holland...(the first but not the last case study of crazy speculation cause by imbalance between desirability & limited supply).
The choice of going back & forth could be an issue for some. But it does finally make a circle on itself.
Wanted to like this, but just didn't feel engaging or interesting for some reason. For one thing, it jumps back and forth in time which just felt confusing when trying to understand the evolution of the beanie baby and how it became popular. Like we literally jump ahead 10 years then back 8 then forward 3 then back 3 again.. ugh.
We also found Zach and Banks both were somewhat jarring in such a strange appearance from their normal look. The dyed brown hair seemed unnatural and just strange that it was distracting. Not a huge deal here but just seemed unnecessarily distracting...
But all in all, the jumping back and forth just never led to a nice, satisfying lead up to their explosion in popularity. It actually made it all feel very anti-climactic.
So, not sure, but just something with how this was put together didn't work for me. Wasn't a fan or engaged in what should be an interesting story..
We also found Zach and Banks both were somewhat jarring in such a strange appearance from their normal look. The dyed brown hair seemed unnatural and just strange that it was distracting. Not a huge deal here but just seemed unnecessarily distracting...
But all in all, the jumping back and forth just never led to a nice, satisfying lead up to their explosion in popularity. It actually made it all feel very anti-climactic.
So, not sure, but just something with how this was put together didn't work for me. Wasn't a fan or engaged in what should be an interesting story..
In 1983, Ty Warner (Zach Galifianakis) and his friend Robbie (Elizabeth Banks) start a plush toy business. His big idea is to under-stuffed them and make them softer. In 1993, medical student Maya (Geraldine Viswanathan) starts working as a receptionist at the company. Sheila (Sarah Snook) meets Ty as she sets up his home lighting.
This type of movies is fast becoming a genre of its own. Some call it corporate biopics. I'm calling it product-bio. First, they need a recognizable product that will generate nostalgia. Then they need some drama for the bio and they should make one up if it doesn't exist. They are good on the first part. Beanie Babies are definite 90's nostalgia-fuel. As for the drama, it exists here. The movie tries to present it in an interesting way by combining three women's stories. I do have an issue with Zach Galifianakis.
I thought he's gay at first even after dating Sheila. He needs to not put his spin on the character. At his heart, he's a slick salesman. He needs to set up his narcissism. The guy has real daddy issues with some juicy sexual aspects. Zach is playing it like an absent-minded professor. He may be the wrong guy to play this role.
The time jumping is fine, but it may be better to simplify it. After all, both Maya and Sheila come into the story at the same time. Maya is probably the most compelling story. I don't see the chemistry between Sheila and Ty. He has more chemistry with her daughters. Robbie's story is standard wronged woman. They really need to show the sexual tension a lot more and earlier. As far as this new genre goes, this entry is an average affair.
This type of movies is fast becoming a genre of its own. Some call it corporate biopics. I'm calling it product-bio. First, they need a recognizable product that will generate nostalgia. Then they need some drama for the bio and they should make one up if it doesn't exist. They are good on the first part. Beanie Babies are definite 90's nostalgia-fuel. As for the drama, it exists here. The movie tries to present it in an interesting way by combining three women's stories. I do have an issue with Zach Galifianakis.
I thought he's gay at first even after dating Sheila. He needs to not put his spin on the character. At his heart, he's a slick salesman. He needs to set up his narcissism. The guy has real daddy issues with some juicy sexual aspects. Zach is playing it like an absent-minded professor. He may be the wrong guy to play this role.
The time jumping is fine, but it may be better to simplify it. After all, both Maya and Sheila come into the story at the same time. Maya is probably the most compelling story. I don't see the chemistry between Sheila and Ty. He has more chemistry with her daughters. Robbie's story is standard wronged woman. They really need to show the sexual tension a lot more and earlier. As far as this new genre goes, this entry is an average affair.
When thinking about this review and the movie, I kept getting drawn back to how flamboyant the characters were and then it struck me. I was watching characters apparently 'borrowed' from The Righteous Gemstones. I know it was the 80's but it was a little cartoonish.
The characters are also presented in such a way that shows most of them in a pretty poor light. Except for the Maya character who was presented in the film as the great underbelly of the company.
Has some entertaining moments and is often interesting but lacks any depth perhaps as its presented more as a comedy than a drama or bio film :)
The characters are also presented in such a way that shows most of them in a pretty poor light. Except for the Maya character who was presented in the film as the great underbelly of the company.
Has some entertaining moments and is often interesting but lacks any depth perhaps as its presented more as a comedy than a drama or bio film :)
Having read some of the reviews on here I almost gave this one a miss.
Im glad I didn't .
This was a cracking little movie.
Great performances by everyone .
The story was interesting , the acting was too notch and I was entertained from start to finish .
I knew nothing about these toys and I was blown away by their story.
Elizabeth Banks never fails to deliver so I was expecting greatness from her but Sarah Snook, Geraldine Viswanathan and Zach Galifianakis also kill it.
You are really brought on a journey and feel all the highs and lows that the actual people must have gone through .
Give this one a go.
It doesn't disappoint.
Im glad I didn't .
This was a cracking little movie.
Great performances by everyone .
The story was interesting , the acting was too notch and I was entertained from start to finish .
I knew nothing about these toys and I was blown away by their story.
Elizabeth Banks never fails to deliver so I was expecting greatness from her but Sarah Snook, Geraldine Viswanathan and Zach Galifianakis also kill it.
You are really brought on a journey and feel all the highs and lows that the actual people must have gone through .
Give this one a go.
It doesn't disappoint.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesMaya Kumar's character (Geraldine Viswanathan) is based on the real life person Lina Trivedi.
- PatzerIn one scene that takes place in 1983, Ty and Robbie are in the toy aisle of a department store examining stuffed animals as they figure out how to make better ones. On the shelf behind them is the board game, "Ticket to Ride", which wasn't published until 2004.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 905: Talk to Me + Extra Terrestrial Visitors (2023)
- SoundtracksOh Sheila
Written by Melvin Riley (as Melvin C. Riley Jr.), Gordon Strozier (as Gordon P. Strozier), Gerald Valentine
Performed by Ready for the World
Vocals performed by Melvin Riley (as Melvin Riley Jr.)
Courtesy of Cleopatra Records, Inc.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Beanie Bubble?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 50 Min.(110 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen