What Is a Woman?
- 2022
- 1 Std. 35 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
8,1/10
46.848
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Es ist die Frage, die man nicht stellen darf. Der Dokumentarfilm, den man nicht sehen darf.Es ist die Frage, die man nicht stellen darf. Der Dokumentarfilm, den man nicht sehen darf.Es ist die Frage, die man nicht stellen darf. Der Dokumentarfilm, den man nicht sehen darf.
Gert Comfrey
- Self - Gender Affirming Therapist
- (as Gert Comfrey MTS LMFT)
Marci Bowers
- Self - Gender Confirmation Surgeon
- (as Dr. Marci Bowers)
Michelle Forcier
- Self - Pediatrician, Professor
- (as Michelle Forcier MD)
Patrick Grzanka
- Self - Professor, Women Gender and Sexuality Studies, University of Tennessee
- (as Dr. Patrick Grzanka)
Miriam Grossman
- Self - Adolescent and Adult Psychiatrist
- (as Miriam Grossman MD)
Rodrigo Lehtinen
- Self - Executive Director, National Center for Transgender Equality
- (as Rodrigo-Heng Lehtinen)
Mark Takano
- Self - D - California
- (as Rep. Mark Takano)
Scott Newgent
- Self - Founder, TReVoices
- (as Scott [Kellie] Newgent)
Sara Stockton
- Self - Clinical Supervisor
- (as Sara Stockton MA LMFT)
Jordan B. Peterson
- Self - Clinical Psychologist, Author
- (as Dr. Jordan Peterson)
Debra Soh
- Self - Author, The End of Gender
- (as Dr. Debra Soh)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This movie is an eye-opener for everyone and for parents in particular.
It showed that the simplest questions cant be answered by the scientists and doctors.
I was surprised that the advocates for transgender people were aggressive and felt offended by simple questions!.
If they have the right to what they are doing, then they should be more confident and calm in these interviews.
Despite the interviews posing some crude questions, they revealed how fragile they are.
I agree there was bias in Walsh's questions but it still delivered what it supposed to. We need more of such documentaries to see all the other opinions.
It showed that the simplest questions cant be answered by the scientists and doctors.
I was surprised that the advocates for transgender people were aggressive and felt offended by simple questions!.
If they have the right to what they are doing, then they should be more confident and calm in these interviews.
Despite the interviews posing some crude questions, they revealed how fragile they are.
I agree there was bias in Walsh's questions but it still delivered what it supposed to. We need more of such documentaries to see all the other opinions.
I was quite surprised to see the level of respect this film had for the subjects, at many points reflecting on the sympathy for children suffering with gender identity.
I think what I appreciated most was that these weren't trick questions, the presenter asked very basic and honest questions - the fact that a univeristy professor was unable to answer simple questions in his own field was very telling. It was a running theme that those who wanted honest discussions were being shut down, lose their careers and even faced imprisonment.
Speaking with an African tribe was also an interesting juxtaposition of societal ideals.
My one criticism is that I wish he had not been able to open the jar of pickles.
I think what I appreciated most was that these weren't trick questions, the presenter asked very basic and honest questions - the fact that a univeristy professor was unable to answer simple questions in his own field was very telling. It was a running theme that those who wanted honest discussions were being shut down, lose their careers and even faced imprisonment.
Speaking with an African tribe was also an interesting juxtaposition of societal ideals.
My one criticism is that I wish he had not been able to open the jar of pickles.
Very enjoyable to watch, but too biased to be called a documentary, and is well designed to support e certain narrative. It cherry picks interviews with stupid or dangerous people in the LGBTQ+ community and well grounded/sophisticated people on the conservative side to present a reality with lunatics vs pragmatists. There are bright minds, like the ones that have helped society move forward the last 100 years, that could provide the real arguments on why gender as a term is a valuable tool in order to study social behaviours and understand ourselves. These bright minds were not presented.
This documentary is affecting. It starts with emotions of confusion, humor and fascination, and journey's deep into a place of disturbance and despair. It has some mild trolling at the start, but it genuinely gives everyone a chance to speak and doesn't have any dishonest cuts. It handles a topic that's managed to become controversial in maybe the last five years. But it also asks questions, that no matter where you stand we should be asking if we really care about people - are the procedures successful outcomes? Are there lasting after effects or issues? Are we influencing people and in what ways? Do children have a clear sense of self and consent?
So, its fairly well produced, it looks good (certainly comparable to other documentaries out there.) All of the technical aspects of the film are in order. Nothing truly stands out as exceptional, but everything is very much professional.
From an approach perspective, it really is more of a documentary than most "documentaries" in that, the main character (Matt Walsh) is asking questions to try and understand the opposing opinion. Most "Documentaries" have a side and then only interview supporting perspectives of the thesis. In this case, Walsh actually interviews the opposing side a lot. For that reason alone, this a more honest documentary. Now, fair-is-fair, I don't like the subject of documentaries to be the documentarian. I believe that would classify it as more journalistic or activist (a-la, Moore or Spurlock.) But it is a common documentary style.
That said, I guess we get into the meat of it and why people love it or hate it. As before mentioned, there is a lot of exchanges with opposing view points, and those view points did not make strong arguments. Did Walsh interview the actual leading experts on the subjects? Maybe, maybe not. They do have considerable credibility, but Walsh himself is by no means an expert in the field, so even if the people he's interviewing are not the leaders, it's not like it's an unfair fight.
I think if you're for or against this subject matter, it's probably a good film to watch. It's always good to know what the opposing arguments are, but for some reason this topic people get very passionate about. From a purely creative standpoint, I think it's great, not exceptional, but if you like documentaries, it's going to be one of the best ones this year.
From an approach perspective, it really is more of a documentary than most "documentaries" in that, the main character (Matt Walsh) is asking questions to try and understand the opposing opinion. Most "Documentaries" have a side and then only interview supporting perspectives of the thesis. In this case, Walsh actually interviews the opposing side a lot. For that reason alone, this a more honest documentary. Now, fair-is-fair, I don't like the subject of documentaries to be the documentarian. I believe that would classify it as more journalistic or activist (a-la, Moore or Spurlock.) But it is a common documentary style.
That said, I guess we get into the meat of it and why people love it or hate it. As before mentioned, there is a lot of exchanges with opposing view points, and those view points did not make strong arguments. Did Walsh interview the actual leading experts on the subjects? Maybe, maybe not. They do have considerable credibility, but Walsh himself is by no means an expert in the field, so even if the people he's interviewing are not the leaders, it's not like it's an unfair fight.
I think if you're for or against this subject matter, it's probably a good film to watch. It's always good to know what the opposing arguments are, but for some reason this topic people get very passionate about. From a purely creative standpoint, I think it's great, not exceptional, but if you like documentaries, it's going to be one of the best ones this year.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesDue to controversy, the reviews for the film were hidden on Letterboxd, with blurb reading, "Due to a high volume of moderation traffic, reviews for this title are hidden at this time. Reviews remain visible on members' profiles, with the exception of those removed for violating our Community Policy."
- Zitate
Matt Walsh: One of the drugs used is Lupron, right? Which has actually been used to chemically castrate sex offenders?
Self - Pediatrician, Professor: You know what? I'm not sure we should continue with this interview because it seems like it's going in a particular direction.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Daily Wire Backstage: What is a Woman? PREMIERE (2022)
- SoundtracksMan! I Feel Like a Woman!
Performed by Shania Twain
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is What Is a Woman??Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 35 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen