Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuNorth Kiyung is threatening U.S with nuclear attacks and missile tests. U.S plans to strike back and train best pilots. However Air force leans on Navy's best fighter Lt. Andrew "Bells". Few... Alles lesenNorth Kiyung is threatening U.S with nuclear attacks and missile tests. U.S plans to strike back and train best pilots. However Air force leans on Navy's best fighter Lt. Andrew "Bells". Few hours before attack the drama unfolds.North Kiyung is threatening U.S with nuclear attacks and missile tests. U.S plans to strike back and train best pilots. However Air force leans on Navy's best fighter Lt. Andrew "Bells". Few hours before attack the drama unfolds.
Keely Yulla Kemp
- Lt. Col. Gilbert
- (as Keely Gelineau)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This movie is bad just bad. I dont know how anyone can rate this higher than a 3. Somehow from the beginning . Just awful intro music that this was not gonna be good. But I gave it a chance as much as I could stand to at least I didn't make it too far into the movie before I could see that this movie was not well made. It didn't seem like anybody could act at all in some aspects it looked like a homemade movie. This is one of those movies thats going to be popular on RiffTrax. It was almost laughable, and I couldn't see wasting anymore time on it. Somehow I get the feeling that some of these early previous reviews are somehow biased. I know this seems like a very harsh review but it's my honest opinion ( I don't like misleading reviews) , don't waste your time.
Here we have another in the long line of 'female empowerment' movies so popular with fashion-minded Hollywood these days.
Now, I think it is quite appropriate and desirable to showcase realistic female capabilities. However, I think it is getting to the point of fantasy and revisionism when we insist that 'women can do anything that men can do, but better' and try to prove that with manipulation, exaggeration and simple fiction.
So we have an example here of ALL the top air force pilots being women. Of course they are, dear. Another comical example we have is the recently released series Special Ops: Lioness, with the female protagonist physically outperforming navy seals. Of course she can, dear.
PS. I am a (realistic, I think) middle-aged woman.
Now, I think it is quite appropriate and desirable to showcase realistic female capabilities. However, I think it is getting to the point of fantasy and revisionism when we insist that 'women can do anything that men can do, but better' and try to prove that with manipulation, exaggeration and simple fiction.
So we have an example here of ALL the top air force pilots being women. Of course they are, dear. Another comical example we have is the recently released series Special Ops: Lioness, with the female protagonist physically outperforming navy seals. Of course she can, dear.
PS. I am a (realistic, I think) middle-aged woman.
It should come as no surprise that I hadn't heard about this 2023 action movie titled "Called to Duty" prior to stumbling upon it by random chance. And with it being a movie that I hadn't already seen, of course I opted to sit down to watch it.
Initially, I figured that this movie was going to be a female-lead cash-in on the "Top Gun" movie success. And without having heard anything about the movie, I didn't really know what I was in for.
And I managed to endure a staggering 32 minutes of absolute boredom, cringeworthy dialogue, and rubbish storyline. Writer Bobby Hammel put together what can only be described as a dumpster fire attempt of a movie script for director Ashley L. Gibson to bring to the screen.
The character gallery in "Called to Duty" was every bit as cringeworthy and shallow as the dialogue, so at least those two things went hand in hand.
Needless to say that I wasn't familiar with the cast ensemble in "Called to Duty". And after what I witnessed in the 32 minutes of mind-boggling boredom that I sat through, I can't say that I was impressed with the wooden, rigid and amateurish performances. The dialogue was delivered with the elegance and grace of a coal shovel in the hands of wooden marionettes.
Do yourself a favor and stay well clear of this airplane crash of a movie. It just simply isn't worth the time, money or effort.
My rating of "Called to Duty" lands on a one out of ten stars.
Initially, I figured that this movie was going to be a female-lead cash-in on the "Top Gun" movie success. And without having heard anything about the movie, I didn't really know what I was in for.
And I managed to endure a staggering 32 minutes of absolute boredom, cringeworthy dialogue, and rubbish storyline. Writer Bobby Hammel put together what can only be described as a dumpster fire attempt of a movie script for director Ashley L. Gibson to bring to the screen.
The character gallery in "Called to Duty" was every bit as cringeworthy and shallow as the dialogue, so at least those two things went hand in hand.
Needless to say that I wasn't familiar with the cast ensemble in "Called to Duty". And after what I witnessed in the 32 minutes of mind-boggling boredom that I sat through, I can't say that I was impressed with the wooden, rigid and amateurish performances. The dialogue was delivered with the elegance and grace of a coal shovel in the hands of wooden marionettes.
Do yourself a favor and stay well clear of this airplane crash of a movie. It just simply isn't worth the time, money or effort.
My rating of "Called to Duty" lands on a one out of ten stars.
This movie has a lower production value and worse acting than adult films.
It's possibly the worst movie I've seen in recent memory.
Every single aspect of film making was executed at a homemade level.
Even the lighting looked like it was rigged with house lamps and the color temperature reminded me of Sony Handycam's.
Terrible, absolutely horrendous acting. I'm not kidding, children in school plays often act better than this.
Worst story, character arcs, and screen writing that I think I've ever seen. No one who worked on this movie should be allowed back into movie production.
Movies like this don't deserve to be made. It was a waste of money and time, and it's an embarrassment on their careers.
It's possibly the worst movie I've seen in recent memory.
Every single aspect of film making was executed at a homemade level.
Even the lighting looked like it was rigged with house lamps and the color temperature reminded me of Sony Handycam's.
Terrible, absolutely horrendous acting. I'm not kidding, children in school plays often act better than this.
Worst story, character arcs, and screen writing that I think I've ever seen. No one who worked on this movie should be allowed back into movie production.
Movies like this don't deserve to be made. It was a waste of money and time, and it's an embarrassment on their careers.
I'd like you to picture the scene in Home Alone when the McAllister parents have realized that they've left their son at home. The cheapskate uncle says it. His inflection and intonation. That's how I say it.
It doesn't make anyone feel any better when they can't leave a positive review. Never before have I created an account on a website for the sole purpose of leaving a comment or a review. Ever.
Because of this movie, I have to break that 25-ish year streak of not falling into that trap. I don't like trashing movies, as they're collaborative projects, and who knows where the faults lie in what ends up being a "bad movie".
No details, no spoilers, no likes versus dislikes... suffice it to say that this movie is a project that should have been abandoned long before someone was able to cast it.
It doesn't make anyone feel any better when they can't leave a positive review. Never before have I created an account on a website for the sole purpose of leaving a comment or a review. Ever.
Because of this movie, I have to break that 25-ish year streak of not falling into that trap. I don't like trashing movies, as they're collaborative projects, and who knows where the faults lie in what ends up being a "bad movie".
No details, no spoilers, no likes versus dislikes... suffice it to say that this movie is a project that should have been abandoned long before someone was able to cast it.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesRoseanne Sorrentino and Toni Ann Gisondi previously appeared together as orphans Pepper and Molly in the 1982 film version of "Annie."
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Called to Duty?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Призвані
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 40 Min.(100 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen