Bagman

So after seeing this one earlier today, I thought I would give it a quick review.

Now I agree with some of the reviews such as these days people are rating gore covered horror movies with high ratings, so they realise that gore filled horror movies are not scary, why? Because they swap the scary for the gore.

This is another side of the same coin, here me out for a second.

This film was enjoyable but not scary one bit, this movie while nothing wrong with it, it became a straight by the book, seen this before non scary horror.

See what I mean when I said, two sides of the same coin. Gore filled horror movies are not scary because of the gore and by the book horror movies are not scary either but both are and can be enjoyable.

Watch this film, enjoy it for what it is and don't hope for anything special.

"Bagman" (2024) is a horror film that explores the terror of a family haunted by a malevolent entity. While it delivers some effective scares and a chilling atmosphere, the film ultimately falters due to predictable plot points and a lack of originality.

The movie effectively uses sound design, lighting, and a secluded setting to create a sense of dread and unease. The jump scares, though frequent, are well-timed and genuinely startling. The performances, particularly from leads Sam Claflin and Antonia Thomas, are commendable, conveying the characters' fear and vulnerability convincingly.

However, "Bagman" suffers from a reliance on familiar horror tropes. The plot follows a predictable pattern, with the family members making questionable decisions that escalate the danger. The antagonist, while visually unsettling, lacks a compelling backstory or motivation, reducing it to a generic force of evil.

Furthermore, the pacing feels uneven. Some scenes drag, while others feel rushed, disrupting the flow of the narrative. The film also fails to delve deeper into the psychological impact of the terror on the family, focusing primarily on the physical threats.

Despite its shortcomings, "Bagman" offers a decent dose of jump scares and a chilling atmosphere for horror enthusiasts. However, those seeking originality or a more nuanced exploration of fear may find it underwhelming.

Grim horror film starring a good family, including chills, mystery and a lot of creepy surprises. Overwhelmed by debt, a father must go back to his old family home with his wife and son. However, a dark creature that stalked him as a child is still there, and now threatens to take away what he holds most dear in the world. Patrick McKee (Sam Claflin) narrowly escaped such an encounter as a boy, which left him with lasting scars throughout his adulthood. Nowadays, Patrick's childhood tormentor has gone back, threatening the safety of his wife Karina (Antonia Thomas) and son Jake (Caréll Rhoden). Patrick will embark on an adventure against time to discover the truth hidden behind the terrifying legend of what is known as "The Bagman". He's always closer than you think !.

The myth of the bogeyman resurfaces once again in this dark and tense psychological and physical horror film. Horror and mystery film with full of thrills, suspense, chiller , eerie intrigue, plot twists, dark atmosphere , and otherworldly happenings, in which a family finds themselves ensnared in a nightmare as they are hunted by a malevolent, mythical creature from father's childhood, returning to haunt them . This same role was in a film last year titled "El hombre del saco" (2023) with Javier Botet in the title role, the latter often plays supernatural villains as ghosts, monsters, witches, demons, etc. And exploring the Spanish origins of the character's story, where he is a tuberculosis patient from Almeria who will do anything to get well, even consuming the blood of the kids he kidnaps in a sack. This Spanish Boogeyman, also called Bagman, a child-kidnapper who used a great bag or sack to get them inside into it, take the children from their bedrooms and disappear with them.

This is an entertaining and creepy proposal, a PG-13 horror film, although it seems prudent to reserve it for somewhat older boys, since its effect may be excessive grim on the little ones. Thus the film will not please the general public at all, the result is not entirely satisfactory: it is much less scary than expected and with shortcomings and failures.

Starring Sam Clafin (Hunger Games) as a father plagued by childhood fears and traumas who must confront his past when an eerie creature that stalked him as a child is still there, and now threatens to take away what he holds most dear in the world. Along with other not very well known secondary actors: Antonia Thomas as his wife, Adelle Leonce, William Hope, Steven Cree, Rosalie Craig and Peter McDonald

Adding a shading and somber cinematography by cameraman Nick Remy Matthews, as well as tense and pulsing musical score by Tim Williams. The motion picture was mediocrely directed by Colm McCarthy, but he doesn't bring anything special to the genre because we've seen the terrifying situations many times before and even better filmed. He's a craftman filmmaker, a director best known for his work on notorious TV series, such as: ¨Peaky Blinders, Sherlock, The Bastard Son & the Devil Himself, Curfew, Doctor Who , Black Mirrow, Krypton, Injustice and Endeavour¨. McCarthy has also directed a few feature films, such as: ¨The Girl with All the Gifts¨, ¨Outcast¨ and this ¨Bagman¨. Rating : 5/10. Average, but with some brief passable moments.

Bagman has low ratings, but I usually don't let that stop me from watching something that seems interesting. Sometimes the movies are incredible, and sometimes they are worse than the ratings. Horror movies are not ever scary to me, but I enjoy the atmosphere and psychological parts of them. Bagman was not anything very original, but it was still a decent watch. I didn't find the movie hard to follow and I didn't see the parents as terrible like so many other reviewers have said.

I gave this a 6 rating and would have a 7 if not for the "ending" of the end of the movie. After how the movie turns out, and that was definitely different and I wasn't really expecting that, but it's after what happens that I felt was a little flat. I guess it ended how it should as not to be carried out to be a 3 hour movie, but I kind of wanted to see more. The climax was good though and I felt made it worth seeing the movie through. That's a good thing. Just when you think you know what's going to happen, because again, it wasn't anything with an original plot. That was a really good way to turn the movie into something different.

I say give it a go. It was a decent movie with a really good ending.

I mean come on... your house has been invaded 10 times and you still choose to watch your kid on a monitor, leave him unsupervised in a tub, and constantly move out of sight of the child to allow things to happen further? Where is the common sense meter when it comes to writing. I understand movies need suspense points but when you have to insult our intelligence to achieve suspense then that's just a recipe for a bad review. No parent will put their in law who has been attacked in the bed with them while they put their baby in another room to watch on a monitor. Lots of holes in the story and terrible editing. At one point a loud bang in the babies room and both parents started running somehow in that 2 seconds the wife was on the phone with the police. God this was awful.