IMDb-BEWERTUNG
7,3/10
1071
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine Untersuchung über die Möglichkeit, dem Klimawandel mit einer Abkehr von fossilen Brennstoffen hin zur Kernenergie zu begegnen.Eine Untersuchung über die Möglichkeit, dem Klimawandel mit einer Abkehr von fossilen Brennstoffen hin zur Kernenergie zu begegnen.Eine Untersuchung über die Möglichkeit, dem Klimawandel mit einer Abkehr von fossilen Brennstoffen hin zur Kernenergie zu begegnen.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
A bit American centric, but otherwise extraordinary. Is obviously biased, but hopefully so and the bias is well justified.
I run a company that focuses on energy storage technologies and have been looking at grid storage systems and applications... Following this, we will abandon that and focus on mobile energy applications where batteries, supercapacitors etc are really important and the best type of solution to address the challenges.
Have to admit that I watched this on a plane, turned me into a blubbering mess. Bravo Oliver, I'm a big fan, but this is your most impactful work to date.
Strongly recommend to anyone, very easy to watch, understand and follow the arguments.
I run a company that focuses on energy storage technologies and have been looking at grid storage systems and applications... Following this, we will abandon that and focus on mobile energy applications where batteries, supercapacitors etc are really important and the best type of solution to address the challenges.
Have to admit that I watched this on a plane, turned me into a blubbering mess. Bravo Oliver, I'm a big fan, but this is your most impactful work to date.
Strongly recommend to anyone, very easy to watch, understand and follow the arguments.
We are taken on a tour of fissions past, when all we ever knew was just a blast, of how a power could just smash, turning the world into cheap trash, while extra fingers, toes and eyes could be amassed; we all know the world is ending due to fossils, we didn't pay too much regard to the apostles, who couldn't break oil cartels, who lied, misled about their wells, with an event of extinction, that is colossal; so what to do, and in essence, who to believe, as we know that everyone will cheat, deceive, it looks like nukes are the escape, to stop environmental rape, until the atoms find a way to make escape!
You know, the problem is, you don't really know, and this is more than likely sponsored by groups with an interest, so keep an open mind, and investigate for yourself.
You know, the problem is, you don't really know, and this is more than likely sponsored by groups with an interest, so keep an open mind, and investigate for yourself.
A compelling case for nuclear energy. A film that shifts the perspective from nuclear "trauma" to the technological wonder nuclear "could" be. A striking claim, but watch for yourselves, to determine if this film is as persuasive as I find it. Not only does it point out the boon nuclear could be for humanity but also how the other resources are lacking and may leave us hacking up smog or what not. Nuclear is more than electricity, how it may heat and supply bounties of clean water, clean transit, etc. Stone does a simple yet effective job of pitching an industry that is unfairly and inaccurately represented and understood by the masses. Watch it and decide for yourselves.
I liked the documentary a lot, except the hysteria and the urgency about man-made climate change, which.is a farce. I am surprised Mr. Stone hasn't researched the latter more thoroughly. I have studied the subject for many years, and it's bs, and the fake heroism of the "save the planet" nonsense is ridiculous and insulting. Still, this is a very good documentary.
I must write a longer review, so I'll add a bit more. I have also studied nuclear power for a long time, and I am not certain this is the way to "save" the world, but again, the documentary makes a very good case for it. The visuals are really great.
I must write a longer review, so I'll add a bit more. I have also studied nuclear power for a long time, and I am not certain this is the way to "save" the world, but again, the documentary makes a very good case for it. The visuals are really great.
Nuclear molecules were from Uranium and Atoms. They talk about that and how it was around in WW1 through submarines. It became more useful over the years and the Uranium is healthier to run other engines than coal. It's a lot of information though. They discuss the pros and cons of each country and certain gases and electricity are harming our world and burning more coal, yet coal is still important because of fire without arson fires. He says China is using too much coal sent to America. The irony is, firefighters won't have a job without out of control fires unless alarms go off without fires.
Wusstest du schon
- Wissenswertes"In Memory of Vangelis 1943-2022"
- VerbindungenFeatured in CNBC's Sustainable Future: Oliver Stone and Joshua Goldstien (2023)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Nuclear Now?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 48.064 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 9.814 $
- 30. Apr. 2023
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 70.675 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 45 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen