IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,9/10
1078
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein Jahr nach den berüchtigten "Jack The Ripper"-Morden haben die Morde aufgehört, aber die Identität des Mörders bleibt ein Rätsel.Ein Jahr nach den berüchtigten "Jack The Ripper"-Morden haben die Morde aufgehört, aber die Identität des Mörders bleibt ein Rätsel.Ein Jahr nach den berüchtigten "Jack The Ripper"-Morden haben die Morde aufgehört, aber die Identität des Mörders bleibt ein Rätsel.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
As a massive Jack the Ripper fan I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed this. Wasn't trying to be something it can't by doing rubbish killings. The cast were brilliant and I preferred this to some of the other Ripper films in recent years.
One year on from the notorious "Jack The Ripper" murders, the killings have stopped, but the identity of the killer remains a mystery. Down-at-heel newspaper reporter Sebastian Stubb has moved on to reporting on other scandals, but when a new "Ripper" letter appears on his desk and the killings start again, he unwittingly finds himself at the center of a new mystery. Has the "Ripper" returned, or is it a copycat killer? Or something else entirely?
One year on from the notorious "Jack The Ripper" murders, the killings have stopped, but the identity of the killer remains a mystery. Down-at-heel newspaper reporter Sebastian Stubb has moved on to reporting on other scandals, but when a new "Ripper" letter appears on his desk and the killings start again, he unwittingly finds himself at the center of a new mystery. Has the "Ripper" returned, or is it a copycat killer? Or something else entirely?
The opening moody shots across what is supposed to be Victorian London should be warning enough to give this movie a miss as it showed Portcullis House which was only opened in 2001 having been built in the late ninties. The plot was awful as was the acting, how this movie ever made it to the production stage is a mystery. The plot line was, at the very least, only suitable fo a pre teen viewing audience and even they would have found it tedious, even the "twist" at the end wasn't even worthy of a primary school exercise. A particular point was that all the costumes provided by the wardrobe department was always in a pristine, freshly laundered state, not commensurate with the period and setting at all. A very dismal waste of time, avoid at all costs.
Despite the link to the real-life Jack the Ripper case, the film Ripper's Revenge failed to deliver a captivating storyline. Writer/Director Steve Lawson's fictitious take on the infamous serial killer lacked originality and seemed to rely too heavily on the Ripper's reputation to keep the audience interested. Even with the casting of Rachel Warren as Iris, the lady of the night and Stubb's girlfriend, the film failed to add any depth to her character or the plot. The lack of character development made it difficult to sympathize with the characters and their struggles. The plot twists were boring and predictable, making the overall storyline unexciting. There were no special effects worth mentioning. In conclusion, Ripper's Revenge was a disappointing film that failed to live up to its potential as a sequel to Ripper Untold (2021). It lacked the necessary components to make it an exciting and memorable film. Waste of time.
I came by this film expecting a cheap slasher style film and was pleasantly surprised by a well acted drama.
This is in no way a horror like the poster suggests but the story definitely keeps you engaged. Chris Bell and Rachel Warren do really well leading the film. Costumes look authentic and the director clearly has a good eye for talent and creating this type of film.
Would have been better with more locations and a few more ripper bits but it still works well as it is.
I enjoyed the twists and the fact that just when you think you have worked out the story, theres another twist around the corner.
This will be a DVD ill be keeping.
This is in no way a horror like the poster suggests but the story definitely keeps you engaged. Chris Bell and Rachel Warren do really well leading the film. Costumes look authentic and the director clearly has a good eye for talent and creating this type of film.
Would have been better with more locations and a few more ripper bits but it still works well as it is.
I enjoyed the twists and the fact that just when you think you have worked out the story, theres another twist around the corner.
This will be a DVD ill be keeping.
If your looking for a FROM HELL type of film then your gonna be disappointed with rippers revenge. I gotta admit i was expecting more gore and horror and more thrills, but; I gotta say the characters made this film what it is. They do very well to keep you watching and the twists are very good. I would say its more of a drama than a horror though.
I havent seen the first one of this film and don't think i need to by all accounts. I have seen a few films now from this director and he does appear to use a small cast but the actors he uses are definately getting better, as are his scripts.
Overall ive given them a generous 6/10 as it did keep me gripped and was well done.
I havent seen the first one of this film and don't think i need to by all accounts. I have seen a few films now from this director and he does appear to use a small cast but the actors he uses are definately getting better, as are his scripts.
Overall ive given them a generous 6/10 as it did keep me gripped and was well done.
Wusstest du schon
- PatzerThe Whitechapel murders took place during 1888. There is colour photo in a draw. Yet colour photography wasn't invented until 1903.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Ripper's Revenge?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 25 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen