IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,9/10
1878
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine moderne Interpretation des britischen Königsdramas, die einen Einblick in das Leben der tödlichsten, sexiesten und ikonischsten Monarchen der Geschichte gewährt.Eine moderne Interpretation des britischen Königsdramas, die einen Einblick in das Leben der tödlichsten, sexiesten und ikonischsten Monarchen der Geschichte gewährt.Eine moderne Interpretation des britischen Königsdramas, die einen Einblick in das Leben der tödlichsten, sexiesten und ikonischsten Monarchen der Geschichte gewährt.
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I personally don't find the acting as bad as some others say, the music doesn't fit the genre but for some reason I think it works. It's whole purpose is to explain the story of Anne Boleyn in a really simple way and even though I knew most of it already, it was still informative for smaller details. Literally the only issue I have with it is the fact that it only has three, 45 min long episodes so you finish it pretty quick and if you liked it, as I did, you feel like they should have tried to do an deeper dive into her younger life or even try and get another 3 episodes out with another historic king or queen and make it a 6 episode season.
I love documentaries about the tudor period but this one is far from good. Surroundings, furniture, hair and clothes that do not fit into the 16th century. The (modern) music is the most annoyable matter of this show. It is just as bad as Reign that I stopped watching because of the settings and the inappropriate music. Must be just like Reign a production for the American audience. It is very surprising that the most famous historians of Great Britain are part of this terrible show. There are much better documentaries than this one, for instance The Six Wifes of Henry VIII or King Henry VIII Man, Monarch, Monster etc.
I honestly started to turn off the television after a few minutes and it was only my laziness that kept me going.
Then I got intrigued.
It isn't inaccurate, but it feels a bit incomplete historically.
ON THE OTHER HAND, who's to say which interpretations (head canons) best fill in the points between the facts we have?
It isn't what I expected.
ON THE OTHER HAND, once you realize it's basically a mash up of the Tudors and Gossip Girl, you're all right.
I certainly hope no "hip" teacher will try to use this in their history classroom, but ON THE OTHER HAND, I'm perfectly ok with kids finding this on their own.
Figuring out the bare bones of history while being highly entertained.
Again, my impulse was to turn it off, toss it out, put it far away from myself. But if it opens the door and someone decides to read more on the Tudors? It would be a win.
Then I got intrigued.
It isn't inaccurate, but it feels a bit incomplete historically.
ON THE OTHER HAND, who's to say which interpretations (head canons) best fill in the points between the facts we have?
It isn't what I expected.
ON THE OTHER HAND, once you realize it's basically a mash up of the Tudors and Gossip Girl, you're all right.
I certainly hope no "hip" teacher will try to use this in their history classroom, but ON THE OTHER HAND, I'm perfectly ok with kids finding this on their own.
Figuring out the bare bones of history while being highly entertained.
Again, my impulse was to turn it off, toss it out, put it far away from myself. But if it opens the door and someone decides to read more on the Tudors? It would be a win.
This series is like a course of "History made easy for Millennials". Rather than read and have the history portrayed in a way that reflects the era, this version turns it into a modern day Ann who uses dialog and twentieth century slang so as to endear it to the hearts and minds of the generation of communicate in this way. It just seems to cheapen the whole series when done in this way. At any moment in the series one expected that Ann would whip out her smartphone and fire off texts to Henry. Or perhaps they'd arrange a liaison in this way! Modernizing stories is fine as a novel approach, dumbing them down is another matter!
With all the great quirky history series around at the moment - The Serpentine Queen, The Empress, and the black comedy/drama The Great. I think with this Blood, Sex and Royalty series, they wanted to make a quirky series that documented one of the most famous royals of all time - Anne Boleyn, and in doing so appeal perhaps to the ones not so much into their history.
However it just turned into a complete train wreck. As an English history buff, especially when it comes to the Monarchy, I felt quite insulted by this series.
Were they trying to make Blood, Sex and Royalty like an adult version of an episode of Horrible Histories? I'd much rather watch HH and actually learn something.
All that I can hope is that this series if it does catch the eye of English History novices, that they will continue onwards to explore more about the Tudor times and what was one of our most important times in history.
However it just turned into a complete train wreck. As an English history buff, especially when it comes to the Monarchy, I felt quite insulted by this series.
Were they trying to make Blood, Sex and Royalty like an adult version of an episode of Horrible Histories? I'd much rather watch HH and actually learn something.
All that I can hope is that this series if it does catch the eye of English History novices, that they will continue onwards to explore more about the Tudor times and what was one of our most important times in history.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How many seasons does Blood, Sex & Royalty have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Кров, секс і монархія
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit45 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen